Marlin 94 peep

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
flounderjig
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:21 pm

Marlin 94 peep

Post by flounderjig »

Looking to put a peep sight on my Marlin 1894, what are you all's opinions? Want to use the existing holes in the top of the reciever.
User avatar
deerwhacker444
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:12 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by deerwhacker444 »

I think these WGRS sights look the cleanest. However when I mounted mine, I put another tapped hole in the receiver to move it forward from the stock position by 1/2"

Image

Link

Here's what mine looks like with it moved forward 1/2"

Image
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men
shall possess the highest seats in Government,
our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots
to prevent its ruin
." Samuel Adams
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14906
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by J Miller »

http://www.skinnersights.com/index.html

I'd suggest Skinner sights. They don't need extra holes drilled and they don't hang off the rear of the receiver like some do.

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
RKrodle
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:14 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by RKrodle »

XS Sights. You can get them in a set with the correct height front sight. And I like the XS front sight.

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct/?p ... ber=920514
Ricky

DWWC
dr walker
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:44 am
Location: southwest Florida

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by dr walker »

I like XS also, but I may try Skinner sights on the next one.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 33589
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by AJMD429 »

First off, here's a bunch of (link) - photos and comments on various peeps I've used on my Marlins and other leverguns:

Look part way down this page: http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=20342
  • As you can see in the above thread, my preference is strongly for the Williams FP (the FP-94 requires side-holes, and the FP-336 mounts on the existing top-holes, front or rear), 'ghost-ringed' by removing the aperture (except for bench-shooting and sighting-in). I like both the original Marlin brass-bead front, or a replacement Williams Fire-Sight, for the front (the Williams FP does NOT require replacement of your front sight).

    I use the Taurus Tang sight ($29 version of the Marble's) for longer 'vintage-looking' guns, mostly for target shooting, and usually with a Lyman Globe front sight.

    For a shorter, say 16" barreled gun, I might want for 'hogs' or other 'snap-shooting', I'll use the Marble's Bullseye rear sight, with a Williams Fire-Sight front sight.



Secondly, with the WGRS (which is nice, but less easy to sight-in; see pics in the above thread), you can also mount it backwards, instead of forwards, and it hangs over the rear less (it is really designed for the 336/1895 action, which has the rear holes further forward). Not quite as smooth a line as drilling the extra hole, but works pretty well, and well enough to try out for awhile to see if you like it enough to drill and tap for the extra hole.

Mounted "Normally" = Image
Mounted "Backwards" = Image

The above pictures are from a post I made about building my 1894 into a 'Night Scout' rifle , if you have any interest in other sighting options. The 'Night Scout' is now my 'go-to' gun for most things -

http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23531

Image
Last edited by AJMD429 on Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:22 am, edited 4 times in total.
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
User avatar
claybob86
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:41 pm

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by claybob86 »

I have the Skinner on mine. Very happy with it! :D
Have you hugged your rifle today?
User avatar
quietman
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by quietman »

Williams 5D or FP are another good choice
flounderjig
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by flounderjig »

The Skinner looks like the one to go with for me. Thank you gentlemen for all your replies and knowledge sharing.
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by Pete44ru »

The Skinner's an ecellent choice, but you're also going to need a new front sight that's higher than issue to zero the rifle, and a rear barrel sight dovetail slot filler blank to replace the removed rear bbl sight (unless it's a folder).

The Skinner (except the LoPro), the XS, and the WGRS all require a higher than issue front sight because, carrying the peep on top of their mount bases, they raise the rifle's line-of-sight more than lower peep sights.

Dr. Tim will make you a nice Patridge front sight of the proper height for $15 - he has a contact section in the middle of his website's online ordering process.

.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 33589
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: Marlin 94 peep

Post by AJMD429 »

Pete44ru wrote:The Skinner (except the LoPro), the XS, and the WGRS all require a higher than issue front sight because, carrying the peep on top of their mount bases, they raise the rifle's line-of-sight more than lower peep sights.
Yep. Only the Williams FP (or 5D), or a tang sight, will allow the identical front sight height.

My Williams FP has a very low profile, which is nice if you're working your way through blow-downs or brush, or just like a sight that doesn't 'stick out' too much. My 1894 didn't have 'side' holes - just the 'top' ones, so I got the FP-336,
Image and although it could go in either set of the top scope-mount holes, I mounted it in the front ones on my Marlin 1984, because I like it better there than in the 'normal' rear position...

Image

Here's the Marlin with the top-mounted Williams "FP-336" in the middle, below a scoped Ruger 96/44, and above a Rossi Puma .44 with factory open sights...

Image
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
Post Reply