reduced loads for hunting deer
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
milboltnut
- Levergunner
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 5:16 pm
reduced loads for hunting deer
Hey fellers
Got a nice mild load for one of my pump rifles. .30-06 180 grain Remington RNSPCL on top of 30 grains of IMR 4198. Sound good for short range for deer ? I'm sure there will be plenty of penetration and expansion 100 yards or less. Ant one hunt with this type of load for deer ?
Got a nice mild load for one of my pump rifles. .30-06 180 grain Remington RNSPCL on top of 30 grains of IMR 4198. Sound good for short range for deer ? I'm sure there will be plenty of penetration and expansion 100 yards or less. Ant one hunt with this type of load for deer ?
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5574
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
While I don’t know what kind of velocity that load might generate, I know several guys who load their .30-06 down to .30-30 levels so that their kids can shoot deer without the heavier recoil.
Makes good sense to me.
Makes good sense to me.
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
I might would use 30/30 bullets to do that however. 30 caliber bullets for the 06 might be a bit too hard for those velocities.......Just a thoughtScott Tschirhart wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:55 am While I don’t know what kind of velocity that load might generate, I know several guys who load their .30-06 down to .30-30 levels so that their kids can shoot deer without the heavier recoil.
Makes good sense to me.
The Lord Bless You
Terry
Terry
- marlinman93
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
- Location: Oregon
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
Since both use the same bullet diameter, why would it matter if the bullets were pushed down the bore of a .30-30 or a .30-06 at equal velocities?41Redhawk wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:58 amI might would use 30/30 bullets to do that however. 30 caliber bullets for the 06 might be a bit too hard for those velocities.......Just a thoughtScott Tschirhart wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:55 am While I don’t know what kind of velocity that load might generate, I know several guys who load their .30-06 down to .30-30 levels so that their kids can shoot deer without the heavier recoil.
Makes good sense to me.
The 30.0 gr. charge of 4198 is going to likely be around 2000 fps or slightly over, so no reason a soft tip or flat nose like a .30-30 uses wont penetrate and expand well. Regardless of which case propelled it.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
-
ywaltzucanrknrl
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:58 pm
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
I use 190 Hornady Sub-X's in a 30-40 Krag SRC and in a 1889 Schmid Rubin 7.5 that run around 1900 fps. I've shot several deer and antelope with them and had great performance.
I could load the 30-40 up a bit, but the 1889 action is weak and around 1900 is a good load for it. The are both pleasant to shoot with those loads and accurate.
I could load the 30-40 up a bit, but the 1889 action is weak and around 1900 is a good load for it. The are both pleasant to shoot with those loads and accurate.
-
milboltnut
- Levergunner
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 5:16 pm
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
under a 100 yards I think it's fine. Brush hunting, most likely 30-50 yards. Be different if I took it out past 100 yards. Mostly off hand shooting, that's why I dropped it down some. If I knew I was shooting 100 yds or farther, I would use a standard load.41Redhawk wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:58 amI might would use 30/30 bullets to do that however. 30 caliber bullets for the 06 might be a bit too hard for those velocities.......Just a thoughtScott Tschirhart wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:55 am While I don’t know what kind of velocity that load might generate, I know several guys who load their .30-06 down to .30-30 levels so that their kids can shoot deer without the heavier recoil.
Makes good sense to me.
If at 200 yards @ 2K FPS will do the job, why would it do the job at 100yds or less ?
Last edited by milboltnut on Wed Nov 26, 2025 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5574
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
A whitetail isn’t that hard to kill. Last year I took my buck with a .45 Colt load that is safe in a Single Action Army.
You just have to punch a hole through them in the right place. If it’s accurate, you can certainly do the job.
You just have to punch a hole through them in the right place. If it’s accurate, you can certainly do the job.
-
milboltnut
- Levergunner
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 5:16 pm
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
For sure !Scott Tschirhart wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 3:29 pm A whitetail isn’t that hard to kill. Last year I took my buck with a .45 Colt load that is safe in a Single Action Army.
You just have to punch a hole through them in the right place. If it’s accurate, you can certainly do the job.
-
Lastmohecken
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
I have been thinking about the same concept, but in my case, I have a Remington 700 in 300 win mag, that I would like to load down to .308 levels for deer hunting. I don't need all of that noise or recoil of the 300 mag, but I like that rifle and scope combo for some of deer hunting. I know I can do it, just haven't got around to it yet.
NRA Life Member, Patron
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
The bad news is the ideal for this application imr 4198 runs about $70 per pound. The good news is it greatly simplifies ciphering the per charge cost what with there being 7000 grains to the pound.....Lastmohecken wrote: ↑Wed Nov 26, 2025 5:34 pm I have been thinking about the same concept, but in my case, I have a Remington 700 in 300 win mag, that I would like to load down to .308 levels for deer hunting. I don't need all of that noise or recoil of the 300 mag, but I like that rifle and scope combo for some of deer hunting. I know I can do it, just haven't got around to it yet.
Re: reduced loads for hunting deer
One of my favorite knockabout rifles is a 7.62 chambered Spanish 1916 Short Rifle that I load to around 40k cup. 40 grains of 3031, Varget or RL15 are all in that ballpark and give 2500-ish for velocity with my dwindling stash of 150 CorLokts. Sadly 3031 is the least accurate but most available powder these days. I look at it as being sort of a 30-30AI thing.