The best of the Winchester model 94's.

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
getitdone1
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1302
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:25 pm
Location: Indiana

The best of the Winchester model 94's.

Post by getitdone1 »

Bought a used Winchester model 94 couple of days ago, should have it in few days. Made in 1950, long fore stock, shotgun butt. Bought it from a Cabela's store in Owatonna, Minnesota. Bet that gun has seen some good hunts in that area.

I don't think it's the best of the model 94's and just wondering which years are thought to be best and how mine compares.

Just about bought a "flat band" made a few years earlier.

Don McCullough
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 21280
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Post by Griff »

I think the "rifles" of the early to mid 1920s were the epitome of Winchester 1894 production. I have two. Both are bone stock, barrel sights and have fair to little blue left. I paid $200 for one and $250 for another. One I bought in PA, the other in IA at a swap meet. I have shot both, and they are VERY smooth and accurate. I don't shoot them anymore, as they are really an investment. As far as carbines, I like the post 64s from the late 70s best. I'm sure that puts me in the minority, but... I don't like the saddle rings, and have yet to find anything I can call "WRONG" with either of my examples.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16944
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Old Savage »

1989-90 :D

Image
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
dgr416
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:14 pm

best of the 94s

Post by dgr416 »

I like my 375 Big bore 94 xtr rifles best of any model 94s I have ever had.The worst 94 was a tie between the 1973 30-30 my dad gave me that lost all the bluing to the reciever and the last 94s made I bought in 25-35 winchester.I could almost pull the stocks off of those.The wood fit was horrible and It does not even look like a model 94 with the safety and side ejection together.
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14906
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: The best of the Winchester model 94's.

Post by J Miller »

getitdone1 wrote:Bought a used Winchester model 94 couple of days ago, should have it in few days. Made in 1950, long fore stock, shotgun butt. Bought it from a Cabela's store in Owatonna, Minnesota. Bet that gun has seen some good hunts in that area.

I don't think it's the best of the model 94's and just wondering which years are thought to be best and how mine compares.

Just about bought a "flat band" made a few years earlier.

Don McCullough
Don,
I picked up a 1950 vintage Win 94 here in IL about 3 years ago that was probably unfired. Handling marks was about it.
I've fired less than a 100 rounds through it. So it doesn't have any stories to tell yet.
I think you'll like yours. The only thing I wish is that Win had D&T'd it for a receiver sight.

Joe
Last edited by J Miller on Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
3855
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: N.E. Washington State

Post by 3855 »

In my opinion, those pieces made from the beginning of production to 1940 are the most desirable from a workmanship standpoint. Quality started to slip post WWII and bottomed out in 1965. As for anything made since then, I challenge anyone to compare, side by side, a prewar gun and a anything made since 1965. There really is no comparison in wood to metal fit, finish or wood quality. Barrel steel may have improved over the years but even a early gun, that still has a good unabused barrel, will shoot better than most folks can hold them.
3855

A Winchester Collector
bogus bill
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: utah

Post by bogus bill »

Here is my 94 I bought new in about 1955. I added the pad as I was a huge kid. Also the williams fool proof.
The 64 is a 1952. I dont think it was fired. I put less then a box through it. I shot a buck with the 94 at about 220 yards.
Image
Image
tman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3243
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 pm

Post by tman »

i have 1915 src. 30wcf. who's trigger breaks like a glass rod. the 80's vintage .356wcf. seems to be well built, trigger not as nice, but a solid gun overall. my browning 1886 src. is built like a bank vault. was i just lucky, with these 3 ? perhaps i lack the sofistication to accuratley judge. am happy with all three. the 1915's got a killer trigger,though
User avatar
JimT
Shootist
Posts: 6578
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm

Post by JimT »

The best '94 is the one you have in hand at the time you need it.
Post Reply