Old Time Hunter wrote:Maybe I should ask this question; if you had a choice between a Marlin '89, Marlin '94, or a Winchester Model 92...all in the same caliber, all at the same price, and all in 99% shape; Which one would you take?
1892 without a doubt!
Modoc ED wrote:Griff - That phrase you used ("still say "made in USA"") may have meaning for guys like you and me but is meaningless for many others now-a-days. Just look at the reproduction guns used in CAS, etc.. It's a shame but sadly, a reality.
Not knocking anyone or their choices. Just my observation and my .02¢
Personally, I own 1 Marlin, 3 Rossis, 2 Italian toggle-link clones, 1 Browning and 29 Winchesters. That "made in USA" is a secondary consideration to me. Fitness for purpose is more important , my 1886 sez "Made in Japan." It's a VERY fine reproduction, yet... I don't think I could bring myself to buy their new 94 that sez the same.
If what I want sez "Made in USA" on it, so much the better, but I'm not buying something I don't want to somehow complete a "look." I've known cowboy action shooters who've remarked their Brazilian and Italian clones so they look like originals. Not to rip off a buyer, but to simply look/feel like they're in 18xx. To me, that's silly. And in today's "global economy" of multi-national corporations, the numbers of foreign investors and stockholders dilute any real meaning to "buy American." My new Chevy p/u has an engine from Canada, trans from Mexico, and wiring harnesses from all over Asia, but... was assembled in TX!
The fact that Marlins are still made here in the USA, and that reason alone, I'll not knock Marlins; although I don't care for them, (that lever pivot point is a sticking point for me), I'd encourage anyone that wants a levergun, to give a Marlin a very close look-see.