OT Castle Doctrine in Texas

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Post by Hobie »

Jason_W wrote: I personally feel that I (and this is just a personal rule of engagement) am not justified in shooting someone if I have not first taken reasonable measures to keep them from entering my dwelling.
I don't care HOW they got to the point that they are a threat, I will not allow them to hurt my family members (including me!). Forgetting or failing to lock a door doesn't give them a free pass. What about a guy who attacks you while you're working in your yard?
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Jason_W
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Jason_W »

Hobie wrote: I don't care HOW they got to the point that they are a threat, I will not allow them to hurt my family members (including me!). Forgetting or failing to lock a door doesn't give them a free pass. What about a guy who attacks you while you're working in your yard?
I was really just stating my own personal rules of engagement. I'm a bit obsessive-compulsive about locking doors (I check like 3 times a night) so I doubt I'll forget.
My first attempt at an outdoors website: http://www.diyballistics.com
User avatar
sore shoulder
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2611
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:51 pm
Location: 9000ft in the Rockies

Post by sore shoulder »

Hobie wrote:
Jason_W wrote: I personally feel that I (and this is just a personal rule of engagement) am not justified in shooting someone if I have not first taken reasonable measures to keep them from entering my dwelling.
I don't care HOW they got to the point that they are a threat, I will not allow them to hurt my family members (including me!). Forgetting or failing to lock a door doesn't give them a free pass. What about a guy who attacks you while you're working in your yard?
It would seem the burden of due diligence to avoid encouraging a hapless innocent from assaulting you in your yard dictates remaining indoors, thereby removing the stumbling block from the otherwise virtuous citizens path.
"He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." Declaration of Independance, July 4, 1776
11B30
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Post by Hobie »

Jason_W wrote:
Hobie wrote: I don't care HOW they got to the point that they are a threat, I will not allow them to hurt my family members (including me!). Forgetting or failing to lock a door doesn't give them a free pass. What about a guy who attacks you while you're working in your yard?
I was really just stating my own personal rules of engagement. I'm a bit obsessive-compulsive about locking doors (I check like 3 times a night) so I doubt I'll forget.
So, you would not defend yourself (or your fiancee) on your front yard?

You're right to have ROE but they need to be based in reality. Innocent people get killed for failing to base their ROE (or their organization's ROE) on reality.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Paul Jenkins
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:45 pm
Location: Wilmington, De.

Castle doctrine

Post by Paul Jenkins »

Hobie,
I like the way you think.

I had a recent incident, recounted here, where I was able to avoid shooting somebody who was impaired and I am glad of it. Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should do something. Wink Nonetheless, I wouldn't hold it against somebody who did just because the intruder was drunk/high. Indeed that makes people less predictable and more dangerous.

Only people drunk on perceived power do unnecessary harm. Either victim or perp.
Jason_W
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Jason_W »

Hobie wrote:
Jason_W wrote:
Hobie wrote: I don't care HOW they got to the point that they are a threat, I will not allow them to hurt my family members (including me!). Forgetting or failing to lock a door doesn't give them a free pass. What about a guy who attacks you while you're working in your yard?
I was really just stating my own personal rules of engagement. I'm a bit obsessive-compulsive about locking doors (I check like 3 times a night) so I doubt I'll forget.
So, you would not defend yourself (or your fiancee) on your front yard?

You're right to have ROE but they need to be based in reality. Innocent people get killed for failing to base their ROE (or their organization's ROE) on reality.
Of course I would. In my, home, in my yard, or out in public, if there is a genuine threat, I'll defend myself or my loved ones.

Mostly, I just can't help but feel bad for the guy mentioned in the opening article who was just drunk and stupid and wandered into the wrong house. I also don't fault the home owner for doing what he did in shooting the kid (I doubt that the homeowner feels great about the situation either).
My first attempt at an outdoors website: http://www.diyballistics.com
ScottT
Shootist
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Post by ScottT »

"In San Antonio last year, a Northwest Side homeowner fatally shot an intoxicated college student who wandered into his home — in the same neighborhood where the student’s sister lived."

Jason,

Please understand that I live in San Antonio. I probably live less than two miles from where this shooting happened. Drunk or not, I would have killed this son of a b___ if he was in my house at night. In that particular case, the drunk broke into that fellow's house.
Post Reply