A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
- Panzercat
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!
A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Maybe some of the sages here can put this somewhat heated debate between a friend and myself to rest.
Medieval Field plate is said to have consisted of three layers-- The outer plate itself, a chain mail layer and padding for impact resistance. My contention is that 5.56 NATO green tip has enough horsepower to punch through all three layers and still have enough left over at the end of the day to mortally wound the wearer. It is, after all a round rated to punch through an East German helmet at 600y and can zip through 1/4in welding steel.
He, on the other hand, insists that one of the three layers will stop this round. I find this to be unlikely in a round that can produce 3100fps and 1300ftlbs of energy. The most I can give on this argument is that maybe it will fragment on the way in, but that's pushing it in my opinion. Medieval armor isn't AR500, so what? Honestly, I'm thinking any rifle round made in the last 100 years would produce similar results, but he's insistent he's seen the stuff made and the mimimum entry level would be a .308 style round. And I'm thinking that's massive overkill.
Any thoughts on the matter?
About the best i can find on the nets is hand gun calibers against simple plate armor, not the layers stuff as described above.
Medieval Field plate is said to have consisted of three layers-- The outer plate itself, a chain mail layer and padding for impact resistance. My contention is that 5.56 NATO green tip has enough horsepower to punch through all three layers and still have enough left over at the end of the day to mortally wound the wearer. It is, after all a round rated to punch through an East German helmet at 600y and can zip through 1/4in welding steel.
He, on the other hand, insists that one of the three layers will stop this round. I find this to be unlikely in a round that can produce 3100fps and 1300ftlbs of energy. The most I can give on this argument is that maybe it will fragment on the way in, but that's pushing it in my opinion. Medieval armor isn't AR500, so what? Honestly, I'm thinking any rifle round made in the last 100 years would produce similar results, but he's insistent he's seen the stuff made and the mimimum entry level would be a .308 style round. And I'm thinking that's massive overkill.
Any thoughts on the matter?
About the best i can find on the nets is hand gun calibers against simple plate armor, not the layers stuff as described above.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
can't answer, but I thought that armor was vulnerable to the British longbow.
some testing info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_longbow
and the famous reality test:
http://www.longbow-archers.com/historyagincourt.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt
and the 600yr anniversary with real volly fire:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EvdsUkbm7w
some testing info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_longbow
and the famous reality test:
http://www.longbow-archers.com/historyagincourt.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt
and the 600yr anniversary with real volly fire:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EvdsUkbm7w
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
. . . Grizz
the Good Confession > The Only Begotten Son of God >
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/ ... rimary_0_1
https://compass.org/article-why-asking- ... -save-you/
†
the Good Confession > The Only Begotten Son of God >
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/ ... rimary_0_1
https://compass.org/article-why-asking- ... -save-you/
†
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I don't know about the armor but I can tell you that in 1977 when I got my first AR-15 I shot it at an old International pick up truck, about a '62 IIRC. A 55 gr. hollow point went thru the bed up against the cab, thru the back of the cab, thru the seat, thru the dash, the firewall and exited the front of the hood.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I have seen 5.56 punch through a Kevlar helmet at 100 yards. Captain David Maxwell did it in 1988 at a range just to show us grunts that the K-pot would not stop a bullet. I seriously doubt that a knight could wear armor heavy enough to stop green tip ball ammo. It chews up concrete backstops easily.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Oh man, a 62 International?
That was a TRUCK
That was a TRUCK
. . . Grizz
the Good Confession > The Only Begotten Son of God >
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/ ... rimary_0_1
https://compass.org/article-why-asking- ... -save-you/
†
the Good Confession > The Only Begotten Son of God >
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/ ... rimary_0_1
https://compass.org/article-why-asking- ... -save-you/
†
- gamekeeper
- Spambot Zapper
- Posts: 17487
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:32 pm
- Location: Over the pond unfortunately.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Whatever you do always give 100%........... unless you are donating blood.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
This.
You can tell your friend:
- Otherwise, they'd still be using it, doofus....
FWIW, Medieval armor was quickly abandoned shortly after the 1st MATCHLOCK hand cannons (handgonnes) came into general use/warfare - never mind modern metallic cartridge ammo.
Chain mail & helmets were still retained, though - as every enemy didn't have a firearm, and folks still needed some protection from swords & arrows.
.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I have no doubt any 5.56 load will shoot through the armor mentioned. Ive also shot through cars enough that I wouldn't feel the slightest bit of faith that old time armor would stop any modern high velocity bullets. Pistol bullets? Maybe.
Green tip seems to be put on some sort of pedestal as a super penetrating load. Its NOT armor piercing in any way, its supposed to be slightly enhanced over the old lead core 55 gr loads, on helmets, at 500 yards. THSAT was the criteria. It aint that great otherwise. There IS a true 5.56 armor piercing load, and green tip ISNT it. From what information Ive seen, its so-so. It doesn't work as well on some modern armor as well as 55 gr m193 ball shot from a 20" barrel. In LE testing all sorts of available loads on car glass and doors, I think its in the middle of the pack, good quality bonded open point or soft point loads hold together better in some examples.
Green tip seems to be put on some sort of pedestal as a super penetrating load. Its NOT armor piercing in any way, its supposed to be slightly enhanced over the old lead core 55 gr loads, on helmets, at 500 yards. THSAT was the criteria. It aint that great otherwise. There IS a true 5.56 armor piercing load, and green tip ISNT it. From what information Ive seen, its so-so. It doesn't work as well on some modern armor as well as 55 gr m193 ball shot from a 20" barrel. In LE testing all sorts of available loads on car glass and doors, I think its in the middle of the pack, good quality bonded open point or soft point loads hold together better in some examples.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I know that the green tip ball ammo is not armor piercing. It is what is most commonly used by the U.S. Army, and is a ailable sometimes to civilians. It makes a good reference point because it is available and makes for easily duplicated tests. The question did not seem to be whether or not armor piercing rounds would do the job. I hope you didn't mistake what I posted above to say that I considered green tip ball ammo to be armor piercing.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
- Panzercat
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Which is what I was also driving at. There are certainly better rounds for the job, but green tip is a convenient, nearly universal benchmark... Though I'm pretty sure even crappy 55gr Tula range trash would do the job.piller wrote:I know that the green tip ball ammo is not armor piercing. It is what is most commonly used by the U.S. Army, and is a ailable sometimes to civilians. It makes a good reference point because it is available and makes for easily duplicated tests. The question did not seem to be whether or not armor piercing rounds would do the job. I hope you didn't mistake what I posted above to say that I considered green tip ball ammo to be armor piercing.
The sad irony is the guy pushing this claims he's ex-Army.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Got me
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
- Buck Elliott
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Read Mark Twain's "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court".
Regards
Buck
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
Buck
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
- AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 32291
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I seriously doubt it would reliably stop a 22 LR, if the criteria was that "one of the three layers will stop this round".
The only round I might give a chance would be well-made chain mail, but it still has openings, and I wouldn't volunteer to be the test dummy.
The only round I might give a chance would be well-made chain mail, but it still has openings, and I wouldn't volunteer to be the test dummy.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I wasn't addressing that comment to you, just making a generalization, many seem to think green tip is some super duty round compared to other things. I think probably any commercial 223 or 5.56 load will perforate the armor mentioned, some may think that being green tip it had some great advantage over 193 or anything else.piller wrote:I know that the green tip ball ammo is not armor piercing. It is what is most commonly used by the U.S. Army, and is a ailable sometimes to civilians. It makes a good reference point because it is available and makes for easily duplicated tests. The question did not seem to be whether or not armor piercing rounds would do the job. I hope you didn't mistake what I posted above to say that I considered green tip ball ammo to be armor piercing.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
- Sixgun
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 18776
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
It's SPEED that penetrates. Yea, lots of other variables like construction of the bullet help out too.
One day, many years ago, (late seventies) when the .223 was a sporting round, an old timer was showing this to me at a gunclub. The club had just erected steel plates on an angle to stop bullets at the 100 meter berm. Shooters were blasting at it with all kinds of stuff that regular guys use, successfully deflecting the bullets downward.
My bud shot a 5 shot group with a .220 Swift and every bullet zipped on through. I can't remember the specifics as to thickness but beings these guys were WW 2 vets....and thrifty, they probably used 1/4" soft plate.
I personally remember one time I was digging a hole for a gate post and I could NOT put this post anywhere else. As I was digging I hit a BIG rock to which I could not dig around. Soooooo.......I went into the house and got out my 03A3 with 6 rounds of WW 2 dated black tip 30-06........I layed down on the ground.....pointed the rifle downward and fired the 6 rounds. Well, I got the post where I wanted it.
That old time armor plate was only good for big fat soft lead bullets going 1,000 fps.-----6
One day, many years ago, (late seventies) when the .223 was a sporting round, an old timer was showing this to me at a gunclub. The club had just erected steel plates on an angle to stop bullets at the 100 meter berm. Shooters were blasting at it with all kinds of stuff that regular guys use, successfully deflecting the bullets downward.
My bud shot a 5 shot group with a .220 Swift and every bullet zipped on through. I can't remember the specifics as to thickness but beings these guys were WW 2 vets....and thrifty, they probably used 1/4" soft plate.
I personally remember one time I was digging a hole for a gate post and I could NOT put this post anywhere else. As I was digging I hit a BIG rock to which I could not dig around. Soooooo.......I went into the house and got out my 03A3 with 6 rounds of WW 2 dated black tip 30-06........I layed down on the ground.....pointed the rifle downward and fired the 6 rounds. Well, I got the post where I wanted it.
That old time armor plate was only good for big fat soft lead bullets going 1,000 fps.-----6
- Panzercat
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I have found a few clips with people shooting .22lr at generic chest plates and helms. It leaves a dent and not much else. That said, the quality of the plate is unknown (vs medieval metallurgy) and that's also a dent in metal. The person beneath it isn't going to be happy.AJMD429 wrote:I seriously doubt it would reliably stop a 22 LR, if the criteria was that "one of the three layers will stop this round".
The only round I might give a chance would be well-made chain mail, but it still has openings, and I wouldn't volunteer to be the test dummy.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I would be surprised if a 62 grain fmj from any good manufacturer would fail to penetrate. The grain weight could be lower, or higher, but the fmj has a reputation for penetration and damage to backstops. Most ranges refuse to allow it, at least those anywhere near me. I have seen plate armor and chain mail in museums. Neither of which seems thick enough to stop most rifle bullets. .22lr is certainly a low powered round. If it dents the armor, quality of most medieval armor is probably less than with modern metallurgy, then twice the velocity and fmj should go right on through.Malamute wrote:I wasn't addressing that comment to you, just making a generalization, many seem to think green tip is some super duty round compared to other things. I think probably any commercial 223 or 5.56 load will perforate the armor mentioned, some may think that being green tip it had some great advantage over 193 or anything else.piller wrote:I know that the green tip ball ammo is not armor piercing. It is what is most commonly used by the U.S. Army, and is a ailable sometimes to civilians. It makes a good reference point because it is available and makes for easily duplicated tests. The question did not seem to be whether or not armor piercing rounds would do the job. I hope you didn't mistake what I posted above to say that I considered green tip ball ammo to be armor piercing.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
- sore shoulder
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2611
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:51 pm
- Location: 9000ft in the Rockies
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I'm pretty confident just about any 5.56 will go through both sides of that armor mail and pad
"He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." Declaration of Independance, July 4, 1776
11B30
11B30
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
As the man said, "there are three types of lies. Lies, darned lies and statistics". He didn't include works of literary fiction lies. Though I really did like the movie with Bing Crosby.Buck Elliott wrote:Read Mark Twain's "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court".
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
- Location: West central Montana
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Proof
Have any of you guys heard of a mid-evil knight being killed or injured by a .223 round??
I rest my case.
Have any of you guys heard of a mid-evil knight being killed or injured by a .223 round??
I rest my case.
Trump 2024
All responses have been cleared by the law firm of "Elmer and Fudd."
All responses have been cleared by the law firm of "Elmer and Fudd."
- Panzercat
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Hmmm. He has a point.harry wrote:Proof
Have any of you guys heard of a mid-evil knight being killed or injured by a .223 round??
I rest my case.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
- Old Ironsights
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 15084
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Waiting for the Collapse
- Contact:
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
But... but...Panzercat wrote:Hmmm. He has a point.harry wrote:Proof
Have any of you guys heard of a mid-evil knight being killed or injured by a .223 round??
I rest my case.
That means...
I AM INVINCIBLE TO BLASTERS, PHASERS, LIGHT SABERS and DEATHNSTAR PLANETARY ANNIHILATION!!!!
MUWAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!! BOW BEFORE YOUR OVERLORD!.... errr... why aren't y'all already dead by the aforementioned?...
Never mind....
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I recall seeing an article in the old SOF magazine about a Russian armor vest from Afghanistan in the 80s. I think it was believed to be titanium fish scale style plates overlapping. The person wearing it was shot at a downward angle through the neck hole of the vest, they apparently knew he was armored, but the 303 round went cleanly through the back of the vest, no problem.
Ive shot enough cars with 5.56 through enough layers of metal that I sure wouldn't want to rely on old style thing plate armor to protect me, no matter the backer material, unless ceramic plate and Kevlar.
Ive shot enough cars with 5.56 through enough layers of metal that I sure wouldn't want to rely on old style thing plate armor to protect me, no matter the backer material, unless ceramic plate and Kevlar.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
SadGrizz wrote:Oh man, a 62 International?
That was a TRUCK
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 20877
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
...YEP!Pete44ru wrote:This.Tycer wrote:Definitive answer: http://doeschainmailstopbullets.singleserving.info
You can tell your friend:
- Otherwise, they'd still be using it, doofus....
FWIW, Medieval armor was quickly abandoned shortly after the 1st MATCHLOCK hand cannons (handgonnes) came into general use/warfare - never mind modern metallic cartridge ammo.
Chain mail & helmets were still retained, though - as every enemy didn't have a firearm, and folks still needed some protection from swords & arrows.
.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Ah, something where I can speak authoritatively.....
I'm a student of medieval history for over 20 years. Visited over 30 castles. I've worn modern reproductions (the good museum level kind) of many types of armor, as well as fought in it (blunt weapons).
Everything from Roman armor, early medieval to Renaissance level stuff.
A plate harness (what you would consider a classic knight in armor, which is actually late 14th century) was designed to stop pointy stuff. The base layer, not counting underwear, was an arming coat and pants. Think a quilted jacket and pants, because that's what they are. These had "points" (tie downs) to which the armor was secured. Mail (not chain mail, which is a contradiction in terms) was used on the areas that could not take plate, basically, the armpits.
A man trained and fitted with a good harness (which came in various grades, from the "GI issue" level of sorta-fits-you stuff, to the full harness, which was fitted individually to a wearer and measured to them) was nearly invulnerable. Thin pointy objects and hard hits from blunt weapons were what killed you. The "estoc" or tuck, basically a sword with no edge, one big pointy bit of steel, was made to attack the joints and seams. Warhammers and halberds would bash their way through or turn the wearer to jelly.
Guns back then shot a fat lead ball at low velocity. Good plate was "proofed" by shooting it at a known distance, usually with a pistol (back then, a matchlock or wheellock), leaving a scar.
At close ranges (where the armor wearer could ginsu the shooter) a musket could definitely penetrate plate, as could a crossbow or longbow out to say 100 yards if you were lucky and hit the right spot. The problem was getting the shot in on a moving target on a fast moving horse.
Earlier armor, mail, was worn over a padded coat (the gambeson) which like the quilted coat, helped stop the blow. When armor started becoming less effective, the regular grunts on the battlefield often only wore the padded "jack" (where the word jacket comes from) which were literally "puffy quilted coats" like modern snow wear, only more so.
The cotton padding would stop arrows, bolts, and sometimes even musketballs and was light and allowed the user to be agile (and even harder to hit). They would also stop a sword slash though not a stab. The English civil war era "buff coats" of thick leather served the same purpose.
And despite what people think, a man in full harness was anything but slow and unwieldy. Knights used to dance in armor to show off their prowess, athleticism and general manliness to the ladies, and as a way to brag to others. It was far from unknown for a knight in decent shape to jump into the saddle directly from the ground in full armor (again, to show off), and military saddles of the time had much higher cantles and seatbacks (can't remember the term right now). Plate armor being tied to the limbs fully distributes the weight across the body unlike current body armor.
So no, any current ammo would probably zip right through plate unless it was a glancing hit or at long range. 5.56mm FMJ of any type, M80 7.62 ball would likely go through the armor and the wearer on both sides at closer ranges, as the armor was never meant to defeat it and is shaped incorrectly.
That said modern armor plate worn in plate carriers which IS intended to do so will stop five or six rounds of 5.56 or 2-3 7.62 at 15 feet. You won't be happy but you'll be alive.
Edit- Tournament jousting armor (totally nonfunctional for anything but the joust), hit on the left side (which took the hit from the lance powered by a horse) might stop a couple rounds from the right angle.....but only in that one spot. Even then, I wouldn't trust it much, as a large lance head powered by a horse is not the same as a 62 gr bullet going a few thousand feet per second.
Edit#2 per post above...medieval armor was not totally abandoned. The cavalry (who primarily worried about swords and lances) kept metal breast and backplates in use right up until WW1. They knew it wouldn't stop bullets, but sabres, yes.
I'm a student of medieval history for over 20 years. Visited over 30 castles. I've worn modern reproductions (the good museum level kind) of many types of armor, as well as fought in it (blunt weapons).
Everything from Roman armor, early medieval to Renaissance level stuff.
A plate harness (what you would consider a classic knight in armor, which is actually late 14th century) was designed to stop pointy stuff. The base layer, not counting underwear, was an arming coat and pants. Think a quilted jacket and pants, because that's what they are. These had "points" (tie downs) to which the armor was secured. Mail (not chain mail, which is a contradiction in terms) was used on the areas that could not take plate, basically, the armpits.
A man trained and fitted with a good harness (which came in various grades, from the "GI issue" level of sorta-fits-you stuff, to the full harness, which was fitted individually to a wearer and measured to them) was nearly invulnerable. Thin pointy objects and hard hits from blunt weapons were what killed you. The "estoc" or tuck, basically a sword with no edge, one big pointy bit of steel, was made to attack the joints and seams. Warhammers and halberds would bash their way through or turn the wearer to jelly.
Guns back then shot a fat lead ball at low velocity. Good plate was "proofed" by shooting it at a known distance, usually with a pistol (back then, a matchlock or wheellock), leaving a scar.
At close ranges (where the armor wearer could ginsu the shooter) a musket could definitely penetrate plate, as could a crossbow or longbow out to say 100 yards if you were lucky and hit the right spot. The problem was getting the shot in on a moving target on a fast moving horse.
Earlier armor, mail, was worn over a padded coat (the gambeson) which like the quilted coat, helped stop the blow. When armor started becoming less effective, the regular grunts on the battlefield often only wore the padded "jack" (where the word jacket comes from) which were literally "puffy quilted coats" like modern snow wear, only more so.
The cotton padding would stop arrows, bolts, and sometimes even musketballs and was light and allowed the user to be agile (and even harder to hit). They would also stop a sword slash though not a stab. The English civil war era "buff coats" of thick leather served the same purpose.
And despite what people think, a man in full harness was anything but slow and unwieldy. Knights used to dance in armor to show off their prowess, athleticism and general manliness to the ladies, and as a way to brag to others. It was far from unknown for a knight in decent shape to jump into the saddle directly from the ground in full armor (again, to show off), and military saddles of the time had much higher cantles and seatbacks (can't remember the term right now). Plate armor being tied to the limbs fully distributes the weight across the body unlike current body armor.
So no, any current ammo would probably zip right through plate unless it was a glancing hit or at long range. 5.56mm FMJ of any type, M80 7.62 ball would likely go through the armor and the wearer on both sides at closer ranges, as the armor was never meant to defeat it and is shaped incorrectly.
That said modern armor plate worn in plate carriers which IS intended to do so will stop five or six rounds of 5.56 or 2-3 7.62 at 15 feet. You won't be happy but you'll be alive.
Edit- Tournament jousting armor (totally nonfunctional for anything but the joust), hit on the left side (which took the hit from the lance powered by a horse) might stop a couple rounds from the right angle.....but only in that one spot. Even then, I wouldn't trust it much, as a large lance head powered by a horse is not the same as a 62 gr bullet going a few thousand feet per second.
Edit#2 per post above...medieval armor was not totally abandoned. The cavalry (who primarily worried about swords and lances) kept metal breast and backplates in use right up until WW1. They knew it wouldn't stop bullets, but sabres, yes.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
He missed the fourth. Political campaign rhetoric.jeepnik wrote:As the man said, "there are three types of lies. Lies, darned lies and statistics". He didn't include works of literary fiction lies. Though I really did like the movie with Bing Crosby.Buck Elliott wrote:Read Mark Twain's "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court".
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Thanks for the information MrMurphy. I like how there are a bunch of knowledgeable people on this forum.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
- Panzercat
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Winning post of thread. Thank you for your expert insight, Sir.MrMurphy wrote:Ah, something where I can speak authoritatively.....
I'm a student of medieval history for over 20 years. Visited over 30 castles. I've worn modern reproductions (the good museum level kind) of many types of armor, as well as fought in it (blunt weapons).
Everything from Roman armor, early medieval to Renaissance level stuff.
A plate harness (what you would consider a classic knight in armor, which is actually late 14th century) was designed to stop pointy stuff. The base layer, not counting underwear, was an arming coat and pants. Think a quilted jacket and pants, because that's what they are. These had "points" (tie downs) to which the armor was secured. Mail (not chain mail, which is a contradiction in terms) was used on the areas that could not take plate, basically, the armpits.
A man trained and fitted with a good harness (which came in various grades, from the "GI issue" level of sorta-fits-you stuff, to the full harness, which was fitted individually to a wearer and measured to them) was nearly invulnerable. Thin pointy objects and hard hits from blunt weapons were what killed you. The "estoc" or tuck, basically a sword with no edge, one big pointy bit of steel, was made to attack the joints and seams. Warhammers and halberds would bash their way through or turn the wearer to jelly.
Guns back then shot a fat lead ball at low velocity. Good plate was "proofed" by shooting it at a known distance, usually with a pistol (back then, a matchlock or wheellock), leaving a scar.
At close ranges (where the armor wearer could ginsu the shooter) a musket could definitely penetrate plate, as could a crossbow or longbow out to say 100 yards if you were lucky and hit the right spot. The problem was getting the shot in on a moving target on a fast moving horse.
Earlier armor, mail, was worn over a padded coat (the gambeson) which like the quilted coat, helped stop the blow. When armor started becoming less effective, the regular grunts on the battlefield often only wore the padded "jack" (where the word jacket comes from) which were literally "puffy quilted coats" like modern snow wear, only more so.
The cotton padding would stop arrows, bolts, and sometimes even musketballs and was light and allowed the user to be agile (and even harder to hit). They would also stop a sword slash though not a stab. The English civil war era "buff coats" of thick leather served the same purpose.
And despite what people think, a man in full harness was anything but slow and unwieldy. Knights used to dance in armor to show off their prowess, athleticism and general manliness to the ladies, and as a way to brag to others. It was far from unknown for a knight in decent shape to jump into the saddle directly from the ground in full armor (again, to show off), and military saddles of the time had much higher cantles and seatbacks (can't remember the term right now). Plate armor being tied to the limbs fully distributes the weight across the body unlike current body armor.
So no, any current ammo would probably zip right through plate unless it was a glancing hit or at long range. 5.56mm FMJ of any type, M80 7.62 ball would likely go through the armor and the wearer on both sides at closer ranges, as the armor was never meant to defeat it and is shaped incorrectly.
That said modern armor plate worn in plate carriers which IS intended to do so will stop five or six rounds of 5.56 or 2-3 7.62 at 15 feet. You won't be happy but you'll be alive.
Edit- Tournament jousting armor (totally nonfunctional for anything but the joust), hit on the left side (which took the hit from the lance powered by a horse) might stop a couple rounds from the right angle.....but only in that one spot. Even then, I wouldn't trust it much, as a large lance head powered by a horse is not the same as a 62 gr bullet going a few thousand feet per second.
Edit#2 per post above...medieval armor was not totally abandoned. The cavalry (who primarily worried about swords and lances) kept metal breast and backplates in use right up until WW1. They knew it wouldn't stop bullets, but sabres, yes.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:42 am
- Location: mechanicsville, md.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
If i am not mistaken, the movie "fist full of dollars" shows one of the bad guys shooting a statue suit of armor getting shot in the heart countless times. Clint Eastwood never batted an eye though when watching!
Rossi 92 .357 lever , and a cz pcr 9mm
Henry .22 lever, Remington speedmaster 552 .22 lr
Marlin Glenfield .22 boltaction
gforce 12ga semi
Taylor's Tactical 1911 A1 FS in .45acp
winchester 1873 44.40
Marlin 336W .30.30
beeman sportsman rs2 dual caliber pellet rifle
henry .22 magnum pumpaction/octagon barrel
stag 5.56 m4 with reddot
Henry .22 lever, Remington speedmaster 552 .22 lr
Marlin Glenfield .22 boltaction
gforce 12ga semi
Taylor's Tactical 1911 A1 FS in .45acp
winchester 1873 44.40
Marlin 336W .30.30
beeman sportsman rs2 dual caliber pellet rifle
henry .22 magnum pumpaction/octagon barrel
stag 5.56 m4 with reddot
- Old Ironsights
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 15084
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Waiting for the Collapse
- Contact:
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Suit of Armor </> big hunk of boiler/stove plate.
Assuming the levergun was a .44-40, it would have no problem punching through an empty cuirass, but I'm not familiar with a BP .44-40 that will punch through boilerplate...
Oh... and Clint staggers appropriately with each hit...
And Ramon? He no like Zombies dat say "aim for the heart"... (where the boiler plate covers...)
Assuming the levergun was a .44-40, it would have no problem punching through an empty cuirass, but I'm not familiar with a BP .44-40 that will punch through boilerplate...
Oh... and Clint staggers appropriately with each hit...
And Ramon? He no like Zombies dat say "aim for the heart"... (where the boiler plate covers...)
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Thanks you sir, that was a clear and concise response and I learned a lot from it.MrMurphy wrote:Ah, something where I can speak authoritatively.....
I'm a student of medieval history for over 20 years. Visited over 30 castles. I've worn modern reproductions (the good museum level kind) of many types of armor, as well as fought in it (blunt weapons).
Everything from Roman armor, early medieval to Renaissance level stuff.
A plate harness (what you would consider a classic knight in armor, which is actually late 14th century) was designed to stop pointy stuff. The base layer, not counting underwear, was an arming coat and pants. Think a quilted jacket and pants, because that's what they are. These had "points" (tie downs) to which the armor was secured. Mail (not chain mail, which is a contradiction in terms) was used on the areas that could not take plate, basically, the armpits.
A man trained and fitted with a good harness (which came in various grades, from the "GI issue" level of sorta-fits-you stuff, to the full harness, which was fitted individually to a wearer and measured to them) was nearly invulnerable. Thin pointy objects and hard hits from blunt weapons were what killed you. The "estoc" or tuck, basically a sword with no edge, one big pointy bit of steel, was made to attack the joints and seams. Warhammers and halberds would bash their way through or turn the wearer to jelly.
Guns back then shot a fat lead ball at low velocity. Good plate was "proofed" by shooting it at a known distance, usually with a pistol (back then, a matchlock or wheellock), leaving a scar.
At close ranges (where the armor wearer could ginsu the shooter) a musket could definitely penetrate plate, as could a crossbow or longbow out to say 100 yards if you were lucky and hit the right spot. The problem was getting the shot in on a moving target on a fast moving horse.
Earlier armor, mail, was worn over a padded coat (the gambeson) which like the quilted coat, helped stop the blow. When armor started becoming less effective, the regular grunts on the battlefield often only wore the padded "jack" (where the word jacket comes from) which were literally "puffy quilted coats" like modern snow wear, only more so.
The cotton padding would stop arrows, bolts, and sometimes even musketballs and was light and allowed the user to be agile (and even harder to hit). They would also stop a sword slash though not a stab. The English civil war era "buff coats" of thick leather served the same purpose.
And despite what people think, a man in full harness was anything but slow and unwieldy. Knights used to dance in armor to show off their prowess, athleticism and general manliness to the ladies, and as a way to brag to others. It was far from unknown for a knight in decent shape to jump into the saddle directly from the ground in full armor (again, to show off), and military saddles of the time had much higher cantles and seatbacks (can't remember the term right now). Plate armor being tied to the limbs fully distributes the weight across the body unlike current body armor.
So no, any current ammo would probably zip right through plate unless it was a glancing hit or at long range. 5.56mm FMJ of any type, M80 7.62 ball would likely go through the armor and the wearer on both sides at closer ranges, as the armor was never meant to defeat it and is shaped incorrectly.
That said modern armor plate worn in plate carriers which IS intended to do so will stop five or six rounds of 5.56 or 2-3 7.62 at 15 feet. You won't be happy but you'll be alive.
Edit- Tournament jousting armor (totally nonfunctional for anything but the joust), hit on the left side (which took the hit from the lance powered by a horse) might stop a couple rounds from the right angle.....but only in that one spot. Even then, I wouldn't trust it much, as a large lance head powered by a horse is not the same as a 62 gr bullet going a few thousand feet per second.
Edit#2 per post above...medieval armor was not totally abandoned. The cavalry (who primarily worried about swords and lances) kept metal breast and backplates in use right up until WW1. They knew it wouldn't stop bullets, but sabres, yes.
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Ironically the mid Hundred Years War stuff, where plate wasn't fully in use, had a few more layers, ie padding tgen mail and individual pieces of plate. The "coat of plates " very common in that time was a few hundred smaller plates riveted to a padded coat and worn over a mix of mail and padding. Not quite as good as 1 giant bit of steel but easier to produce and fix. Depending on the load and range, Shield in the way or not, etc.... even modern rounds might not ALWAYS get through. But typically especially inside say 100m.... dead guy in armor is the result.
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
I have seen the movies whwew someone puts a thick piece of steel from a stove or something similar under their shirt to stop the bullets. Depending on the thickness of the steel, it may work. That thickness of steel would sure get heavy to wear all day. I would rather not be in a position to be shot.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Re: A Question for the Ages - Medieval Armor.
Sort of like a line from a Terry Pratchett book (satire and fiction) where everyone is signing up and joining units (the nation is going to war). One old sergeant (police type) who had served in the infantry is relating his experiences to the young guys. Shows them their equivalent of the Bible and relates how his grandpa wore it in his pocket and it stopped an arrow from hitting him in the heart. Everyone is like wow, cool story, lucky man, etc..
Sergeant then says "Shame about the other 17 arrows though........."
Sergeant then says "Shame about the other 17 arrows though........."