![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
time to move on , i switched to ixquick.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012 ... s-results/
what...you say something...who... :OBlaineG wrote:Google is responsible to the paying customer: commercial businesses. After you understand that, everything else falls logically in place. I love Google for everything, especially since my memory is going.....
http://www.musicstudents.comRusty wrote:El Chivo,
I know you didn't post o this to call attention to your site but I'd like to look it over if you don't mind posting it.
I've always been led to believe that Google used some kind of strange algorithm that had to do with the number of requests you have on your subject. You also can buy space on Google where you pay for your position by the number of clicks you get on your site. That can also cost you a lot of money since your competition can search for your site and keep clicking away until they have cost you big time bucks.
I don't quite agree, since the end users (general public) and the paying customers (retail sites) are two different populations. Google was, at first, and is still supposed to be, complete and pertinent content for the general public who searches on it. If an advertiser can benefit from this, well and good. But by skewing the search results you're not serving your end users, not that they have a clue. Bypassing sites that have exactly what was searched for, and then substituting an advertiser who doesn't, means the end user is not getting an honest search. This makes Google just a network of billboards along the information superhighway.Google is responsible to the paying customer: commercial businesses. After you understand that, everything else falls logically in place. I love Google for everything, especially since my memory is going.....