It even applies to the 30-30 !!!!!

KirkD wrote: . We can sell or ship or trade them directly to each other without having to register them, or the trade or transaction. We don't even need to go through an FFL dealer.
I agree with Perry!pwl44m wrote:That is great Kirk. Please have Your Guys talk to Our Guys.![]()
Perry
+1 on both points...!pwl44m wrote:That is great Kirk. Please have Your Guys talk to Our Guys.![]()
Perry
Bingo! This is GREAT news!Griff wrote:For a government, ANY government to admit a mistake is colossal! Congrats to you and any that had a hand in accomplishing this!
The news I read on CBC news is that it is 'dead' at midnight tonight. That sounds like registration is dead as of midnight tonight. I think a lot of fellows will be taking a look around just in case they might have forgotten to get them all signed up back when it was instituted. Just sayin'.Canuck Bob wrote: ... is the law dead at midnight tonight as far as transactions go? I certainly wouldn't own an unregistered gun but it would be nice to know.
Here, here!Griff wrote:For a government, ANY government to admit a mistake is colossal! Congrats to you and any that had a hand in accomplishing this!
very, very cool......KirkD wrote:The Federal registry didn't even wait until midnight tonight. They shut down this afternoon!! This is a great day!
I'm more than happy for you, Bob.......Our country, on the other hand, is really starting to go to stuff.I'm extra proud of my country today.
Griff wrote:For a government, ANY government to admit a mistake is colossal! Congrats to you and any that had a hand in accomplishing this!
Which means we'll be trying it any day now.KirkD wrote:The registry was a colossal, 2 billion dollar failure in preventing even a single crime.
You know I found some dusty guns too. There are going to be a flood of classifieds soon, yahoo!KirkD wrote:Whoa! Is that a Remington 870 under all that dust?!! and what's this? ...... a Browning 1886 SRC carbine!
The former party in charge (Liberal) pushed this through with the lies that it would only cost 85 million and the fees would self found afterwards. What a joke after 2 billion! Just think of how many LEOs we could of had on the streets catching the scum for that money.BAGTIC wrote:
Did they actually admit a mistake or did they blame it on their predecessors? There is a difference.
It seems that in the last 24 hours, a lot of fellows have been finding rifles and shotguns that got 'lost' about 10 years ago.Canuck Bob wrote:You know I found some dusty guns too. There are going to be a flood of classifieds soon, yahoo!
I can speak of importing to Canada but not the other way. We usually dream of guns and products we read about but can't source. I think your government has been very restrictive at the border going both ways.Mescalero wrote:Who is importing these Canadian treasures?
I always tell people Calgary is like Houston with colder weather and goofy accentsCanuck Bob wrote: In regards to the past years our Alberta Province has always supported sporting firearm use. They told the Federal government that if they wanted it enforced to pay for it and never pushed enforcement. Our necks are about as red as you'll find in Canada. Kinda like Texas, lots of oil, guns, ranchers, and loggers.
We have our share of houston natives up here working in the patch. I always refer to Jeff Foxworthy on the subject of accents. We, of course, speak the colonial version of the Queen's English, y'all draaaawl!chadbr wrote:I always tell people Calgary is like Houston with colder weather and goofy accentsCanuck Bob wrote: In regards to the past years our Alberta Province has always supported sporting firearm use. They told the Federal government that if they wanted it enforced to pay for it and never pushed enforcement. Our necks are about as red as you'll find in Canada. Kinda like Texas, lots of oil, guns, ranchers, and loggers.![]()
Congrats on the getting your shackles cut!
Chad