POLITICS - Ted Sampley Vis-a-Vis John McCain

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:32 pm

You should really check out this guy. He is just about soley responsible foir all the anti-McCain garbage. He a nut that has personally and almost singly, had a Boner for McCain for decades. Follow all the rumors against McCain and you will come back to Ted Sampley. He's also responsible for slanderous attackes on numerous other people, including President Bush, and Barama, amoung a few. If you want to make an important decision based on the ravings of a kook, you go right ahead. You can Google this clown and see for yourself the slime this guy pulls out of his fevered brain and it would seem that the only support he gets is from other kooks. Should NOT believe everything you read on the internet, Gentlemen........

This is where old Ted spreads his stuff..http://www.usvetdsp.com/...he seems to be the sole author and by golly, it's part of a web site trying to sell stuff.....Hmmmm

J Miller · Post by **J Miller** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:06 pm

Never heard of him. But I have heard of McCain and his voting record. No slander if it's facts.

Joe

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:51 pm

McCaine is a scum sucking lying parasite, his military record and POW experience excepted. His military career in no way qualifies him for the office of the President. He flip-flops a magnitude of order worse than johnkerry does. He is deluded and dangerous. Just read his voting record and public policy statements. He's left of hillaryclinton and barrackhussein combined. I'm not even convinced he's in his right mind.

Other than that I don't have any bones to pick..,

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:52 pm

Just read his voting record and public policy statements. He's left of hillaryclinton and barrackhussein combined. I'm not even convinced he's in his right mind.

I'd be interested to see you prove that one.

You must have seen monkeys fly out of someone's butt this morning

AJMD429 · Post by **AJMD429** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:16 pm

McCain is likely just another big-government idiot like most of the politicians we've let the New York Times 'pick' for us by calling them 'electable'

BUT at least he isn't blatantly ANTI-GUN like ROMNEY is.

McCain has actually voted pro-gun most of the time.

Huckabee is legitimately and completely pro-gun, and so is Ron Paul.

That should tell you who trusts you (Paul, Huckabee) or not (the Dems, Giuliani, Romney), and who plans on ignoring you or even hurting you if it is convenient.

In the end though, we'll get what we ask for - "the lesser of two evils" and when taxes are higher, government regulations worse, schools worse, health care more expensive, and gun laws more annoying - we can all be glad we picked the lesser of two evils...!

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:24 pm

AJMD429 wrote:McCain is likely just another big-government idiot like most of the politicians we've let the New York Times 'pick' for us by calling them 'electable'

BUT at least he isn't blatantly ANTI-GUN like ROMNEY is.

McCain has actually voted pro-gun most of the time.

Huckabee is legitimately and completely pro-gun, and so is Ron Paul.

That should tell you who trusts you (Paul, Huckabee) or not (the Dems, Giuliani, Romney), and who plans on ignoring you or even hurting you if it is convenient.

In the end though, we'll get what we ask for - "the lesser of two evils" and when taxes are higher, government regulations worse, schools worse, health care more expensive, and gun laws more annoying - we can all be glad we picked the lesser of two evils...!

They are all evil........RP would be a meglomaniac......

cubrock · Post by **cubrock** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:08 pm

BlaineG wrote:
AJMD429 wrote:McCain is likely just another big-government idiot like most of the politicians we've let the New York Times 'pick' for us by calling them 'electable'

BUT at least he isn't blatantly ANTI-GUN like ROMNEY is.

McCain has actually voted pro-gun most of the time.

Huckabee is legitimately and completely pro-gun, and so is Ron Paul.

That should tell you who trusts you (Paul, Huckabee) or not (the Dems, Giuliani, Romney), and who plans on ignoring you or even hurting you if it is convenient.

In the end though, we'll get what we ask for - "the lesser of two evils" and when taxes are higher, government regulations worse, schools worse, health care more expensive, and gun laws more annoying - we can all be glad we picked the lesser of two evils...!
They are all evil........RP would be a meglomaniac......

I respectfully submit that McCain has time and again shown himself to be the megalomaniac (that is, someone obsessed with delusions of power, importance, and grandeur). I haven't seen Ron Paul erupt in temper tantrums on the House floor like McCain has in the Senate.

My sister knows Ron Paul and his wife and reports they are both down to earth, caring people. She even has their cookbook they put out for some worthy cause. Not that a cookbook makes or breaks someone, but I do find it humorous that they put one out and their local constituency bought them all.

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:00 pm

BlaineG wrote:
Just read his voting record and public policy statements. He's left of hillaryclinton and barrackhussein combined. I'm not even convinced he's in his right mind.
:shock: I'd be interested to see you prove that one. You must have seen monkeys fly out of someone's butt this morning :lol:

1. mccain-finegold
2. amnesty for illegals
3. http://www.anncoulter.com/
4. Combined with his (past) de-emphasis on border-security, I think itâ€™s fair to say that McCainâ€™s positions are more in line with the ACLU than most conservatives: http://minx.cc/?post=253616
5. http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OT ... jQ2Njg0Y2Y
6. http://www.mittromney.com/News/Press-Re ... Detour_1.5
7. http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Yj ... ZiOGNhOGQ=

etc., etc., etc..,

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:55 pm

Never said I liked the man, but he is NOT left of the socialist trash runing against him on the "D" side. Your links and such only prove he is not as good an "R" as we would all like to see in there..... It's your vote. I'd rather everyone voted as opposed to just bloviating about the outcome.

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:07 am

BlaineG wrote:Never said I liked the man, but he is NOT left of the socialist trash runing against him on the "D" side. Your links and such only prove he is not as good an "R" as we would all like to see in there..... It's your vote. I'd rather everyone voted as opposed to just bloviating about the outcome.

I sincerely hope that the proposition is never put to the test.

I am almost driven to the idea that I might have to vote for husseinery. It would be better for America to lose to al queda with dems in office than with someone who claims to be a republican, but isn't.

A republican, basically, is FOR the republic. mccain has proven that he is an elitist who is mentally unstable. mccain would be all the worst of every bad president, and I honestly cannot think of one good thing he might achieve. He's a statist. That means he thinks he's the law and you're his subject. About as far from republican-ism as you can get in my book.

Hey, the new york times endorsed mccain. That all by itself is more than enough reason to shun him as unfit for American politics.

Anyway, if I can find a picture of mccain standing at hill's or hussein's right hand I'll post it for ya..,

;) Grizz

bunklocoempire · Post by **bunklocoempire** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:53 am

BlaineG wrote:

They are all evil........RP would be a meglomaniac......

I.. I.. I just can't resist!

I guess Ron Paul would be a meglomaniac based on his ....voting record? ...BlaineG's fortune telling? Here's one place you can compare voting records, scandels etc.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ron_Paul (Ron Paul)

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_McCain (John McCain)

If that don't help you, dig around for some more sites (you don't use just one source of info do you?), or just keep spewing "the future". Yeah yeah he can't win blah blah... A bad analogy for ya, My house is on fire, I can use a garden hose to start putting out the fire (along with my neighbors and their garden hoses), or I can wait for the fire department and their big hose. At least the anti-Pauls talk stink about him here, the media simply doesn't say anything one way or the other, that should be a clue to some. Then again...

BlaineG wrote:

Your links and such only prove he is not as good an "R" as we would all like to see in there..... It's your vote.

What would be a good "R" as we would like to see in there? Nah, lets settle for McCain, thats why I only put new brake pads on one wheel of my truck, good enough right? I don't like it, but it least I put new brake pads on, kinda.

Back to meglomaniac... Bilderburg Group, Council of Foreign Relations, who is associated with those groups? Really don't want hissy fits here, just want to encourage some research and thinking. We really can't afford brand loyalty. Remember we may have four years to prepare for the next debacle, start NOW. More than ever we have to fight against this "settling for" to beat democrats stuff. I'm in, are you? My apologies for all the bad analogies and rant.
Thanks, Bunkloco

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:18 am

Well, the NFL got the Constitution RIGHT yesterday before the game. Made me proud to be an American again. We need a candidate who is just like that, and means it. Near as I can tell they really all are stinking liars and cheats, not pro-American patriots.

I don't think any of them will do the country right by the constitution. For one thing, that would mean getting rid of several TONS of Federal regulations. Seen any candidates offering to restore what freedoms we've lost during my lifetime?

That would be a candidate to hoorah..,

Grizz

cubrock · Post by **cubrock** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:35 am

Grizz wrote:Well, the NFL got the Constitution RIGHT yesterday before the game. Made me proud to be an American again. We need a candidate who is just like that, and means it. Near as I can tell they really all are stinking liars and cheats, not pro-American patriots.

I don't think any of them will do the country right by the constitution. For one thing, that would mean getting rid of several TONS of Federal regulations. Seen any candidates offering to restore what freedoms we've lost during my lifetime?

That would be a candidate to hoorah..,

Grizz

Yep - Ron Paul. And he is the only one to do so.