This is fun to me. I hope nobody gets too annoyed!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
bogie
Yes.Bogie35 wrote: . . . WINCHESTER 92 or MARLIN 94?
Wow. What a loser.Terry Murbach wrote:FOR THE ABSOLUTE LIFE OF ME I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY PACO OR HOBIE ALLOW THE WASTE OF BANDSPACE FOR SUCH CHILDISH SILLYNESS AS QUESTIONS LIKE THESE !!!
YOU HAVE ME CONFUSED WITH SOMEONE WHO GIVES A SHIQ WHAT ANYONE LIKE YOU THINKS. DO YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO PICK OUT YOUR LACE PANTIES TOO ??Bogie35 wrote:Wow. What a loser.Terry Murbach wrote:FOR THE ABSOLUTE LIFE OF ME I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY PACO OR HOBIE ALLOW THE WASTE OF BANDSPACE FOR SUCH CHILDISH SILLYNESS AS QUESTIONS LIKE THESE !!!
And a "Shootist"? That's laughable.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sincerely,
bogie
Terry Murbach wrote:Bogie35 wrote:Terry Murbach wrote:FOR THE ABSOLUTE LIFE OF ME I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY PACO OR HOBIE ALLOW THE WASTE OF BANDSPACE FOR SUCH CHILDISH SILLYNESS AS QUESTIONS LIKE THESE !!!
Terry Murbach wrote:BOGIE,
WHEN YOU FIND YOURSELF IN A HOLE THE FIRST THING TO DO IS STOP DIGGING.
SIXGUN, YOURS IS A MOST APROPOS ANSWER HERE IN A SEA OF FOOLISHNESS. I DO INDEED TRY TO KEEP IN MIND THAT I'VE BEEN DOING THIS A LONG TIME AND GENERALLY KNOW WHICH END THE BULLET COMES OUT OF THE GUN. WHAT REALLY SETS ME OFF THOUGH IS SOMEONE WHO ASKS A QUESTION LIKE THE ONE UP FOR DISCUSSION HERE IN WHICH HE DID NOT EVEN CARE ENOUGH TO BONE UP ON THE SUBJECT AND ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION. IT IS LIKE THEY WANT US TO TELL 'EM EVERYTHING FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME ON A SUBJECT THEY THEMSELVES HAVE NOT SPENT A MINUTE STUDYING NOR DO THEY CARE A HOOT TO STUDY THE SUBJECT. I AM AT A LOSE TO UNDERSTAND THAT MIND SET AS MY GUN LIBRARY IS LARGE AND GROWING EVERY DAY. I SPENT THE ENTIRETY OF MY 5th GRADE READING "SIXGUNS BY KEITH", I MEAN TO SAY THE WHOLE NINE MONTHS I WAS IN THE FIFTH GRADE. NO ONE CARES NOW TO DO SUCH A THING. TELL 'EM ' YOU CAN READ THAT ON PAGE 293 OF 'SIXGUNS BY KEITH' AND THEY'RE INSULTED:" AFTERALL I DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR SUCH FOOLISHNESS AS IT IS UP TO YOU TO SPOON FEED ME PABLUM LIKE A BABY I AM."Sixgun wrote:Terry,
With all of your vast knowledge, you should realize that one time, you were a punk like usRelax dude. This stuff is new to a lot of guys here. Be thankful they are indulging in firearms talk instead of playing with dolls or choking their chickens.
![]()
I remember one time I asked a question on the strength of barrel liners and you came up with not only the answer, but a scientific answer in the exact psi that a barrel liner can take. I was extremely impressed. Only guys like you, JT, JTaylor, Veral Smith, Hobie, Elmer Keith, and good ole Skeeter can or could answer questions so deep.
Come on Terry, be a good sportAnd I'll see you at the inauguration tomorrow for some chicken chokin'
------------Sixgun
Oh, the question---Not much difference between pre-war Marlin 1894's or Win. 1892's. Post war, no comparison---the '92 is tops
Well, I don't know, I think I prefer my Peace Makers and Bisleys with a little less engraving, but I did really like that third model Dragoon, with the Ivory Grips.J Miller wrote:I read. Not as much as I need to, but I read. I've read Sixguns by Keith. And "Hell I was There. I need to get more of his books and some of John Taffins too.
My problem is this danged computer. I spend way too much time on it rather than in a good book. Gotta do something about that.
Oh, yes, Sixguns by Keith page 293; nice stuff there. But I ain't gona tell. You guy gotta look 'em up for yourself.![]()
Joe
That is just rude.Terry Murbach wrote:FOR THE ABSOLUTE LIFE OF ME I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY PACO OR HOBIE ALLOW THE WASTE OF BANDSPACE FOR SUCH CHILDISH SILLYNESS AS QUESTIONS LIKE THESE !!!
Hi, Joe. My M1894 is my favorite rifle. Never fired a W92, but I'd be interested in why you don't like 'em.J Miller wrote:You said we could include copies so my vote in this one is MARLIN 1894. I learned to despise the 92 action.
Joe
No different than standing around the gunshop or campfire and starting up with a conversation about such things. We all have opinions, and enjoy learning from each other's experience and knowledge.El Chivo wrote:this isn't a question where somebody didn't bone up on a subject, it's another opinion poll about favorites and preferences. Sometimes something good comes out of these posts, which is why I read them.
Exactly right Old Savage.Old Savage wrote:ALLOW IT? On what grounds would you not allow it? This is a discussion over two lever actions. What happened to discuss anything politely.
YOU HAVE ME CONFUSED WITH SOMEONE WHO GIVES A SHIQ WHAT ANYONE LIKE YOU THINKS. DO YOU HAVE SOMEONE TO PICK OUT YOUR LACE PANTIES TOO ??[/quote]Terry Murbach wrote:
Bogie, that was not kind, not at all. Some people actually read books instead of get their knowledge off of the internet. Terry, I really LOVE your posts and enjoy reading them. But you should not have been baited here by this young guy. Terry, you are a highly respected man here of vast know-how, but extremely few of us have your experience and knowledge. I know its hard, and you even stated that you try to take into consideration that most of us are new and inexperienced. More importantly, we need a good "Father Figure" to help us learn and to demonstrate gentlemanly conduct. Knowledge is one thing, but gentlemanly conduct is much harder to learn. Please help Father us in this regard. You ARE a Shootist afterall and for good reason. As David Torkelson once told me about Shootists, "Were into integrity." I know about 10 of you guys now, and without failure you are the nicest, most generous, most humble people I have ever met.Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
I don't. I let them talk.slimster wrote:Like the old saw "nothing new under the sun". How often do you sit down at the dinner table with family or friends and NOT talk about subjects that have been discussed before? Most every topic here has been at least touched on previously. I can usually pick up at least a couple of new nuggets each time from other's experiences, so I enjoy it and find it useful. Thanks everyone for sharing! ...BTW, I prefer the Win.92!
I have to guess that I wasn't clear in my explanation... Let me say it another way.Old Savage wrote:New people are here all the time, they don't know how it works and they bring up subjects which are old to some, new to others. The subjects are labeled - if you don't want to read them don't. That they shouldn't be asked because they have been dealt with in some form before isn't in keeping with the ongoing nature of the membership or changing interests. I found the responses interesting and informative
So if some are "going to get their panties in a wad" as has been used by what they perceive as repetition I would say they are least as pertinent as your mother's cats.
Yea, I really like those lace panties. They make you feel sooooooooooo......................well, go ask your wife, she knows the ones I likeSixgun jr wrote: I understand where Terry is coming from, But NO need to make fun of Lace panties. Some of us like the way they feel on their skin. Tell'em dad.![]()