OT: Cimarron

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Aries
Levergunner
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:38 am

OT: Cimarron

Post by Aries »

Anyone own one of the stainless Cimarron guns and any opinions on them and which do you prefer, stainless or not?
http://www.handgunsmag.com/featured_han ... on_072804/
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6513
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by marlinman93 »

My Cimmaron is a .32-20 with cased frame and blue. I'm not a fan of stainless myself, just doesn't look traditional.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
Mutt
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: South Coastal Texas

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by Mutt »

I don't have a stainless , but my wife just gave me a B/C Bisley Cimarron .45 for us getting along for 6 whole years. I love it. A few finish mistakes , but man does it shoot. Right where I aim. None of the four Colts SA s I own will come anywhere close . Hard to believe I paid 1000 bucks and more for the Colts and can't hit the barn with , and a 500 dollar imitation beats all of them. Right out of the box. Really has helped me to re-enjoy my fun time.............Mutt
User avatar
claybob86
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:41 pm

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by claybob86 »

I like stainless just fine. I see no reason why old designs should not be manufactured with modern materials. I still like 'em in blue/CCH too! :)
Have you hugged your rifle today?
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

Aries wrote:Anyone own one of the stainless Cimarron guns and any opinions on them and which do you prefer, stainless or not?
http://www.handgunsmag.com/featured_han ... on_072804/

I would rather go with EMF's Great Westen II in stainless. The parts are historically correct accept for the leaf type hand springs. The GWII's have the coil spring update. Plus, EMF's customer service is tops. I do warranty work for EMF and I have seen them replace guns that I know were abused.

Image

Here is a pair of their express pistols setup for a lady SASS mounted shooter.

Image
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
JustaJeepGuy
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1079
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by JustaJeepGuy »

Mutt wrote:None of the four Colts SA s I own will come anywhere close.
There was an article in either Gun Digest or Handguns 2xxx (I can't recall what year) by a guy who didn't want "imitation" Colts, and he didn't want to bend/file front sights to make the guns shoot, so he bent the barrels. He would take a 12-ton hydraulic press to the range, and try his chosen load and bend the barrel until the gun hit where the sights pointed. He said that the actual amount of bending necessary wasn't much, and you couldn't tell from the photos that the barrel had been bent. I have done this with a pellet rifle and it worked wonders. I was unable to put my rear sight far enough left to get on paper; then I bent the barrel and centered the sights up. I will be trying this on a Ruger Bisley Vaquero I have some day. It's worth considering.
A man's admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him.

Alexis de Tocqueville
User avatar
Buck Elliott
Member Emeritus
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by Buck Elliott »

JustaJeepGuy wrote:
Mutt wrote:None of the four Colts SA s I own will come anywhere close.
There was an article in either Gun Digest or Handguns 2xxx (I can't recall what year) by a guy who didn't want "imitation" Colts, and he didn't want to bend/file front sights to make the guns shoot, so he bent the barrels. He would take a 12-ton hydraulic press to the range, and try his chosen load and bend the barrel until the gun hit where the sights pointed. He said that the actual amount of bending necessary wasn't much, and you couldn't tell from the photos that the barrel had been bent. I have done this with a pellet rifle and it worked wonders. I was unable to put my rear sight far enough left to get on paper; then I bent the barrel and centered the sights up. I will be trying this on a Ruger Bisley Vaquero I have some day. It's worth considering.
Some folks'll do whatever they want, even if it's wrong, just because they can...
Regards

Buck

Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
JustaJeepGuy
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1079
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by JustaJeepGuy »

How is it wrong? It would depend on why the sights wouldn't match the POI, maybe? I won't condemn it if it works.
A man's admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him.

Alexis de Tocqueville
flb
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:31 am

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by flb »

Never bent a rifle or handgun but if you are a trapshooter and haven't bent a barrel you haven't shot much. Bent mine to shoot 80% high, easy if done right. Best shooter I every saw was Britt Robinson(a legend in trap) bent all his barrels.
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6513
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by marlinman93 »

It's wrong because it makes a gun look terrible! Plus it can cause the ejector rod housing to break free of the barrel. That's a tiny little screw holding the end of the housing, and it takes very little pressure to snap it off.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
JustaJeepGuy
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1079
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by JustaJeepGuy »

The bend is very slight, just a few thousandths over the length of the barrel. The ejector rod housing screw won't be affected; it won't do anything different than it did before. As far as looks, would you really prefer a front sight bent up, filed down and otherwise mangled?
A man's admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him.

Alexis de Tocqueville
User avatar
Buck Elliott
Member Emeritus
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming

Re: OT: Cimarron

Post by Buck Elliott »

If it's just a simple matter of windage, it can usually be cured by turning the barrel in ever so slightly until the sight comes up square with the rest of the gun... Or until it shoots where it is pointed. Very rarely is the barrel already screwed too far in, but if so, it can usually be backed off a tad if needs be.

Trap guns are one thing, but sixgun barrels are another breed of cat entirely. DON"T bend 'em...
Regards

Buck

Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
Post Reply