Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4949
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Maybe to the right?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
It looks like your forcing cone is about nonexistent. There's no taper at all.
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Is your B/C gap even or perhaps more open on the right?
Then, is your cylinder carrying up properly? If not fully rotated into the locked position the bullet would hit that side of the forcing cone.
Or if the barrel/ cylinder gap is even, and the cylinder carries up, then it could be misaligned. Do you have a plug rod to check alignment?
Then, is your cylinder carrying up properly? If not fully rotated into the locked position the bullet would hit that side of the forcing cone.
Or if the barrel/ cylinder gap is even, and the cylinder carries up, then it could be misaligned. Do you have a plug rod to check alignment?
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Well hey, at least it's to the right -- and not to the LEFT!
Old No7
ps: I have a Brownells' 11-degree forcing cone cutting tool you can borrow if needed; just PM me.
Images below of the one I cleaned up in my Ruger Old Army.
Before: After:

Old No7
ps: I have a Brownells' 11-degree forcing cone cutting tool you can borrow if needed; just PM me.
Images below of the one I cleaned up in my Ruger Old Army.
Before: After:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Freedom and the Second Amendment... One cannot exist without the other." © 2000 DTH
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Does each chamber shave lead like that ? Timing issue , if not , a bad cylinder maybe.
Rumble.com/ hickock45
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Definitely more deposits on the right !
Gettin old ain't for sissies!
There just has to be dogs in heaven !
There just has to be dogs in heaven !
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4949
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4949
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
It appears to be uniform and it locks up correctly before the hammer falls.JRD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 4:45 pm Is your B/C gap even or perhaps more open on the right?
Then, is your cylinder carrying up properly? If not fully rotated into the locked position the bullet would hit that side of the forcing cone.
Or if the barrel/ cylinder gap is even, and the cylinder carries up, then it could be misaligned. Do you have a plug rod to check alignment?
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Why don't you buy a range rod an see? PTG makes them and highly recommended. Check each chamber . I had the whole revolver chamfering kit at one time . Was cutting forcing cones left and right . Finally got tired of it sold the kit. Now I need it again.
Pacific Tool makes all of the above and must for revolver shooters.

Pacific Tool makes all of the above and must for revolver shooters.
- LeverGunner
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:27 am
- Location: Cecilia, Kentucky
- Contact:
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
A little side note. Ruger uses a 5º forcing cone. If you do end up cutting the cone for whatever reason, cutting it with an 11º reamer will cause it to have to be deeper, and thus wider at the mouth, making the unsupported portion of the barrel weaker. I don't remember the spec, but the do specify how much meat is supposed to be between the outside of the barrel and the edge of the forcing cone.
The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
BulletMatch: Cataloging the World's Bullets.
Lead Alloy Calculator
BulletMatch: Cataloging the World's Bullets.
Lead Alloy Calculator
- marlinman93
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6830
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
- Location: Oregon
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Have you tried feeler gauges between the cylinder and barrel to see what the gap is? If it's too wide this can result in what you're seeing. But as mentioned I'd like to see at least a little taper to the bore at that area too.
Last edited by marlinman93 on Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 9802
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
- Location: The Land of Enchantment
Re: Do you think there’s a misalignment problem here?
Darryl, that forcing cone you cut sure looks purty. 
