.
I see all these articles where scientists are surprised at some new finding, clearly indicating how little solid knowledge they have about things that affect 'climate'. Yet they insist on being given power and money to somehow control climate on our behalf and save us from ourselves.
In this article they found that there was a stabilizing effect when the sun is blocked which causes less clouds, in turn allowing more sun to penetrate to the surface. In other words a negative feedback loop that tends to stabilize things.
One would think that such an unexpected finding would be good news, because it indicates that there are a lot more stabilizing influences for climate than previously realized. However, since it interferes with their agenda of having an elite group of scientists control climate, they say that "Since this is sort of the opposite of what scientists want to happen..."
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws "first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
AJMD429 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:57 pm
.
I see all these articles where scientists are surprised at some new finding, clearly indicating how little solid knowledge they have about things that affect 'climate'. Yet they insist on being given power and money to somehow control climate on our behalf and save us from ourselves.
In this article they found that there was a stabilizing effect when the sun is blocked which causes less clouds, in turn allowing more sun to penetrate to the surface. In other words a negative feedback loop that tends to stabilize things.
One would think that such an unexpected finding would be good news, because it indicates that there are a lot more stabilizing influences for climate than previously realized. However, since it interferes with their agenda of having an elite group of scientists control climate, they say that "Since this is sort of the opposite of what scientists want to happen..."
when liars tell the truth it's still the truth. this is a great example of truth leaking out in spite of spiteful experts.
The truth is Almighty God owns and operates earth, including the climate. another truth is that there is not one shred of scientific evidence that carbon controls the climate. NOT ONE. It is a supposition of the 'scientists, falsely so-called' who are shocked to discover an entire universe full of stars they never knew existed. I look forward to the next uber-wonder telescope to launch and re-shock them.
Lately dna researchers have worked out a way to sequence dna that bonded with granite and clay in a way that preserved it for a million years and probably more. what do you suppose the code is? they haven't read the script, that's why they are surprised AND they believe their own assumptions, that is why they are shocked. neurons down the drain . . .
.
ai_more artificial artifice ai.png
can you hear Divine Laughter ?
.
† grizz
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
.
Yet another example of 'scientists' fear-mongering over things they don't even understand. They continually voice 'surprise' at things they though would go one way that go another, yet they expect us to find them credible and go with whatver dramatic social policies will 'save us' from the latest threat. The only beneficiaries are the scientists who receive government grants for saying what the politicians want them to say, the big corporations who are the beneficiaries of lucrative government contracts involved in all these 'fixes', and of course, the Liberal Lemmings who love to virtue-signal endlessly about how 'environmentally conscious' they are.
But this is what the 'news' media constantly feeds the young people - if you have any relative in the under-40 age group, be SURE you provide them some outside-the-bubble information to counter all the 'environmental' nonsense they are being fed.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws "first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
There was a telly news special where a reporter traveled on a u.s. navy sub to the arctic. The whole subject of the trip to our primitive outpost there on the ice was our need of a continued presence near the north pole. Everyone was of the opinion that by 2030, due to climate change, there would be year round channels of open water where there is now solid, unnavigatible ice 11 months of the year. One commenter opined that nature better hurry as there is only 5 1/2 years yet for the cap to melt. The worry is that the future newly open(ed) water will allow china easy nautical access to realms that have been elusive to them before. "They" are already concerned about polar bears further south having to swim to munch on inuits and their sleigh dogs where/when the bears have historically had solid ice to easily migrate over.
AJMD429 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:02 pm
.
It keeps getting sillier and sillier and yet the 'progressives' and 'environmentalists' have no self-awareness as to their ignorance...
.
'Missing Carbon' - these 'environmentalists' are such optimists - they assume people will take them seriously when they keep finding inconsistencies in their theories. Yet we are supposed to completely re-form our society and economic systems based on whatever their latest 'idea' is...
AJMD429 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:16 am
.
'Missing Carbon' - these 'environmentalists' are such optimists - they assume people will take them seriously when they keep finding inconsistencies in their theories. Yet we are supposed to completely re-form our society and economic systems based on whatever their latest 'idea' is...
No self-awareness or humility at all. That should frighten us all.
But if you don't have data to support your agenda, you evidently can just make it up (like they do with 'gun violence')...
"... And it’s not just a few missing stations providing made-up numbers, pointed out Lt. Col. John Shewchuk, a certified consulting meteorologist, who was interviewed by Spence for the story.
“NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30 percent of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist,” Shewchuk told Spence. “They are physically gone – but still report data – like magic.”
To this day, NOAA still relies upon temperature “data” from the ghost stations, with an “E” for estimate..."
