.
This woman says it well (reminds me of Jordan Peterson).
https://youtu.be/Yo-NC3PPOqU
She refers to this nonsense as "the fragility game", and that's a good was to express it.
She is very analytical.
'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
-
AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 31019
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Re: 'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
My nouns work for free. None of them has gone Pro. I guess that is why I am still not understanding all of this.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Re: 'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
interesting I suppose. I see it as shallow and squishy . . . there is a good synopsis of her argument in the video notes . . .
a. she misses the issue of Language. The "words have meanings" basis for communication. This effort to deny reality and force others to deny reality is over-all a deliberate attack on sanity and community, which needs meaningful communications to exist. the attack on language and grammar is deliberate confusion to break down human norms. [get it?] [community communicate] destroy language, destroy communications, and you destroy the community and the civilization becomes uncivil . . .
b. she ignores the reality of gender, that it is part of our operating system, our DNA, and it is encoded in every cell in the body. it is binary. it is reality. it is created.
c. her arguments are floating above the reality check, and she says (i'm paraphrasing). your reality can be whatever you want to believe, just slaughter the meaning of grammar, where meaning comes from, and we can float airy-fairy above the fray, comrades in insanity.
d. BUT THE BIGGEST VOID I SEE IS THIS >>> THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF SPIRITUAL REALITY in her position. It is humanistic to the core. She deals with a person's "self-concept" in such a way that there is not the "wait a minute, hold on there" moment where the REALITY superintends the discussion, that "we are made in the image of our Creator, as males and females." She uses words like truth and reality in an abstract way that glosses over the overwhelming Reality of the creative act of Yaweh, (for lack of a more certain and definitive expression) in causing the universe and causing humanity so he can share with us in the fundamental foundation of all existence. ...
e. she may or may not be an unbeliever, but her carefully chosen wording is devoid of any hint of a concept of Holiness. I am not accusing her but I do not know how her pronouns can function when they are devoid of the overarching reality of existence . . . in the precise sense of "to be". We value humans precisely because we are the special creation of the creator of reality.
f. almost an aside, but telling, is the fact that the translators and translations originating in Antioch and resulting in the King James Bible, have the artifacts of men so devoted to Truth that they used the exact greek pronouns in the exact way that greek grammar uses them, in order to not offend Holy Spirit by assuming that they know more than the One who inspired the words to begin with, in the beginning....
g. to twist the pronouns, to twist the grammar, leads only to perversion of "self-concept", and denial of absolute true Truth, which is the objective of the hater of our souls . . .
H > † the Ancient of Days
grizz
P.S. this is the link to the article she referenced >> https://criticaltherapyantidote.org/202 ... rejection/
a. she misses the issue of Language. The "words have meanings" basis for communication. This effort to deny reality and force others to deny reality is over-all a deliberate attack on sanity and community, which needs meaningful communications to exist. the attack on language and grammar is deliberate confusion to break down human norms. [get it?] [community communicate] destroy language, destroy communications, and you destroy the community and the civilization becomes uncivil . . .
b. she ignores the reality of gender, that it is part of our operating system, our DNA, and it is encoded in every cell in the body. it is binary. it is reality. it is created.
c. her arguments are floating above the reality check, and she says (i'm paraphrasing). your reality can be whatever you want to believe, just slaughter the meaning of grammar, where meaning comes from, and we can float airy-fairy above the fray, comrades in insanity.
d. BUT THE BIGGEST VOID I SEE IS THIS >>> THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF SPIRITUAL REALITY in her position. It is humanistic to the core. She deals with a person's "self-concept" in such a way that there is not the "wait a minute, hold on there" moment where the REALITY superintends the discussion, that "we are made in the image of our Creator, as males and females." She uses words like truth and reality in an abstract way that glosses over the overwhelming Reality of the creative act of Yaweh, (for lack of a more certain and definitive expression) in causing the universe and causing humanity so he can share with us in the fundamental foundation of all existence. ...
e. she may or may not be an unbeliever, but her carefully chosen wording is devoid of any hint of a concept of Holiness. I am not accusing her but I do not know how her pronouns can function when they are devoid of the overarching reality of existence . . . in the precise sense of "to be". We value humans precisely because we are the special creation of the creator of reality.
f. almost an aside, but telling, is the fact that the translators and translations originating in Antioch and resulting in the King James Bible, have the artifacts of men so devoted to Truth that they used the exact greek pronouns in the exact way that greek grammar uses them, in order to not offend Holy Spirit by assuming that they know more than the One who inspired the words to begin with, in the beginning....
g. to twist the pronouns, to twist the grammar, leads only to perversion of "self-concept", and denial of absolute true Truth, which is the objective of the hater of our souls . . .
H > † the Ancient of Days
grizz
P.S. this is the link to the article she referenced >> https://criticaltherapyantidote.org/202 ... rejection/
Re: 'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
With the relatively recent flare-up of sex changes and the younger average age at which it has been occurring, I wonder about the suicide rate these groups will experience in the coming years.
Re: 'Pronouns', and 'gendering'...
That and the inevitable class lawsuits. but i think by that time those poor creatures will just be exterminated as unsuitable and unfit for labor . . .