Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post all political posts here.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing

Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
Post Reply
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 30671
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by AJMD429 »

.
It seems like the feds love to see things they don't want to get to the public and then say they are "involved in an investigation".

It's no secret that people think that's why they raided Trump's home because Trump probably had evidence that implicated people who were trying to throw the election by claiming there had been Russian influence.

Isn't it convenient that they are now seizing documents from Biden's home? Now whatever those are will get buried and never will the public know the contents. I wouldn't be surprised if it was stuff that implicated the Biden family with the Ukraine corruption that they purposely took out to his house to be 'discovered' so they could be forever sealed from the public view.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 15958
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by Old Savage »

You are a suspicious one ;-)
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
gamekeeper
Spambot Zapper
Posts: 16041
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: Across the pond but visible from a tall tree in Maine.

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by gamekeeper »

Old Savage wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:35 pm You are a suspicious one ;-)
Not without due cause I would say......
->'It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames' - Harry Hill
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10543
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by Grizz »

the subtle but crucial difference is that Trump as president can and did de-classify all the documents he had.

biden, as VP, HAD NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO POSSESS CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND SQUIRREL THEM AWAY OUT OF THE PROPER CHANNELS ! ! ! biden committed treason . . .

there is NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO THINGS


although this is the drumbeat of the narrative repair drones . . .

this shot exposes the mental process:
Screenshot 2023-01-15 082410.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 30671
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by AJMD429 »

.
There are definitely lots of people explaining to the electorate how different the violations are between Trump and Biden as far as these classified documents. In fact it doesn't really look like Trump violated any laws anyway.

J.P. Sears and of course Dan Bongino, did good programs on it, as have others.

BUT I THINK THERE IS A DEEPER LAYER TO BOTH OF THESE...

Realistically, Trump seems to have been cooperating with the authorities, had not broken any laws because he had the power to declassify, and his documents were certainly in a better secure environment than what Biden had. Those who say Biden is president now and can declassify them are missing the point that he admits he didn't even know he had them, and they date from his vice presidency, and vice presidents have no such power.

BUT AGAIN I THINK THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN THAT...

... and it is in this sense that the Trump and Biden classified document cases have something very much in common...

I think Trump quite likely had documents he was maintaining possession of or copies of, which implicated individuals within the government who attempted to overthrow the 2016 election, and probably also evidence implicating many of the same individuals in successfully overthrowing the 2020 election. So the brilliant move by the justice department to bury those documents was not only to seize them, but then involve them in "an ongoing criminal investigation", which as we see time and time again, is the government's excuse to hide information that would cause outrage if the public were made aware of it.

I hope that part makes sense, and I think Dan Bongino and others have expressed similar thoughts, though with far more eloquence and evidence.

NOW TO THE SECOND PART....

Suppose there was evidence implicating the Biden family in shady deals with Ukraine and or China, or for that matter a whole host of other things. With a potential Republican investigation on the horizon, those documents need to be made inaccessible to as many people as possible. What better way than to 'discover' them in a separate investigation (in other words not the laptop computer one or anything like that, but one involving 'possession of classified documents' just like with Trump), box them up and haul them off to the justice department, never to be seen again, because they will perpetually be deemed "involved in an ongoing investigation". As long as the Democrats can make sure that whatever the ongoing investigation is has the right people in charge, and has limits placed on it versus being an open-ended investigation, both of which it seems like they have successfully done, it's quite possible that they will keep essential documents out of the hands of any more aggressive investigations that may happen if they conservative Republicans can truly maintain leverage over McCarthy.

I don't know how well they will be able to bury evidence like that, but it seems to be something that the swamp does fairly frequently, with a fair amount of success.

So there may be two different reasons that the Democrats actually appear to be cooperating with an investigation into the documents Biden had possession of which he should not have had possession of.

x) one reason I think we can rule out is that they actually have a conscience and are trying to do the right thing.

a) many of them likely went Biden out of the way to pave the way for a candidate that is at least popular enough (my bet is Michelle)) that when they use fraud to win the next presidential election the 'win' would be deemed somewhat plausible by the naive voters. "Finding" these documents, whether they were planted or he actually had them, and feigning 'concern' via a long (until after the 2024 election) investigation would be a convenient way to get rid of a candidate that they no longer want on their side.

b) there is undoubtedly much evidence lurking around implicating the current administration, and a whole host of bureaucrats and federal agencies, in the attempted election coup in 2016 and the successful one in 2020. Although that could certainly accidentally be erased or lost like they do sometimes, and even better way would be to tie it up by involving it in "an ongoing criminal investigation". That way even if other copies of it exist they cannot be brought to light because they would still be considered part of that evidence and therefore not allowed to be released. Of course the Democrats conveniently leak anything and everything that's in their best interest, but you can bet we won't see much in the way of leaks with anything that would damage the party.

Anyway, I think we have to be careful not to be distracted by smoke and mirrors when the real issue may be deeper.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10543
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by Grizz »

maybe when the bidens ship enough weapons and cash to Ukraine, they will emigrate there :?: :lol:

you have to ask how much of that money is going into a secret numbered Lesser Antilles bank account, eh?

8)
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 30671
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by AJMD429 »

.
It looks like McCabe is pretty much saying they should do what I thought they might be up to...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... ion-video/
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 16887
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where Colt Single Actions Are King and Everything Else Is J.U.N.K.

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by Sixgun »

FORGET analyzing anything we are told for any reason. When something don't make sense, there's another reason that's going to play out in the future.

It could be Trump is laughing his A off when or if his case goes to trial......his "top secret documents" could have been hand stamped by him and will define what kind of toilet paper he prefers.

Biden is getting so bad in the brain he has to go.....and we are all sure he is getting the very best of brain/medical care. He is beyond hope and probably pottys in his pants.

Get rid of Biden so the Dems can brag about having the "first woman of color" to put color in the White House but the way I see it, it's already stained by the Muslim Obama.

Who knows and who really gives a rats butt......ain't nothing any of us can do to change the final outcome....we all saw that in the 2020 election.
Merwin & Hulbert
44-40 W.C.F. 1887
4th Model DA Fac.Ivories
Image
Communist States.....in CA, CT, DC, DE, HI, IA, MD, NJ, NY, RI, OR, and WA
Walt
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 275
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2022 4:01 pm
Location: NM

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by Walt »

Your argument makes sense, Doc. It's hard to imagine the Dems releasing information for no real benefit. A minor admission to cover up a major poopstorm.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 30671
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by AJMD429 »

Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
4t5
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:28 am

Re: Just a thought on hiding evidence...

Post by 4t5 »

Since congress controls the purse strings, Kevin McCarthey should withhold funding for the fbi.
Rumble.com
Post Reply