Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:27 am
- Location: Wiregrass Area,Alabama
Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Are strength and durability a issue over time with the Modern Winchester 1886 Miroku takedowns vs standard breech.I am also interested can the takedowns handle a steady diet of modern Hot Wild loads.Looking for some experienced 1886 owners opinions because I have been coveting a Deluxe takedown in 45-70.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
All takedown Winchesters have/had a method for tightning the barrel/receiver fit. We must then assume Winchester knew that the gun would shoot loose or stretch somewhat. As far as the strength goes, the barrel and receiver steel in new guns is superior to the old ones and those have held up well over the last 120 years. Shooting "hot" loads in any gun is going to wear them out faster than normal loads. My suggestion is to shoot moderate loads most of the time and limit "hot" loads to hunting situations. I have never understood the need to beat yourself and the gun up for fun. I would rather shoot 20 rounds of moderate loads over 10 rounds of hot ones. Remember the story about the old bull and the young bull and the heifers in the next pasture.
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
I have used all sorts of somewhat "hot" loads in my original takedown 1886s, but only when hunting. Like Gun Smith says, why shoot them on a regular basis? Unnecessary and hard on the old iron. For that matter, it's hard on the new ones too.
Personally, I don't honestly believe that there any strength difference between the solid frames and the takedowns. Winchestser would not have marketed them if that had been the case.
Personally, I don't honestly believe that there any strength difference between the solid frames and the takedowns. Winchestser would not have marketed them if that had been the case.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16760
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
There was one old 1886 here that blew up with hot loads.
-
- Shootist
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:46 pm
- Location: BLACK HILLS, DAKOTA TERRITORY
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
WHAT IN THE WORLD WOULD "HOT WILD LOADS" BE PRAY TELL ???
RIDE, SHOOT STRAIGHT, AND SPEAK THE TRUTH
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
To me they are something to be FEARED. I guess adding several grains to any TOP load could be considered to fit that criteria. Accident waiting to happen.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
- Rimfire McNutjob
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
- Location: Sanford, FL.
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
I think we should probably point out that pre-Nickel Steel vintage '86's should probably not be fired with "Hot Loads". I think any '86 from Nickel Steel on should be fine whether it's Winchester or Miroku.Old Savage wrote:There was one old 1886 here that blew up with hot loads.
Of course, one could probably blow up any gun with a load that is excessive beyond reason ... let's say a 45-70 mistakenly filled to the brim with Unique or some such craziness.
I will note that my takedown in 450 Alaskan was done with full threads instead of the traditional interrupted thread Winchester method. But I think it was just precautionary. I would have full confidence in an older Nickel Steel '86 with the normal interrupted threads.
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Hot Wild Loads are a thing I avoid in any rifle. But I don't think the takedowns are any weaker in terms of the action than a standard. The "weakness" is in the takedown system. If it is frequently taken down sooner or later the takedown points wear and the barrel/receiver connection gets sloppy -- not desireable, but it has no effect on action lockup. As already mentioned, most all takedown systems have some method of tightening up built in to them. And for most takedowns, there's rarely a genuine reason to take them down, anyway.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:30 am
- Location: Lower Central NYS
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
I am a slow learner,but I do learn.
What these guys say (which so many of them have much more
experience with this cartridge than I do)makes complete sense.
The Great thing about a 45-70 is that big bullet does not have
to go that fast.I loaded some handloads this week and reduced
my velocity 350fps it was so much more pleasant to shoot.
For years being mainly a velocity crazed magnum hot head,I
am finally learning what the old schoolers who know a lot are talking
about.Big and slow is good and will do the job.
After seeing and hearing about some of the groups they are shooting with those big slow bullets like KirkD with his(1 inch groups @ 100yards or an article where a guy shoots aprox 1 foot groups
@600yds.Both of these with old open sighted guns???Big and slow works.I want a Model 1873 Springfield or Springfield 1888 and I will put my Ruger#1 in the corner for awhile.
What these guys say (which so many of them have much more
experience with this cartridge than I do)makes complete sense.
The Great thing about a 45-70 is that big bullet does not have
to go that fast.I loaded some handloads this week and reduced
my velocity 350fps it was so much more pleasant to shoot.
For years being mainly a velocity crazed magnum hot head,I
am finally learning what the old schoolers who know a lot are talking
about.Big and slow is good and will do the job.
After seeing and hearing about some of the groups they are shooting with those big slow bullets like KirkD with his(1 inch groups @ 100yards or an article where a guy shoots aprox 1 foot groups
@600yds.Both of these with old open sighted guns???Big and slow works.I want a Model 1873 Springfield or Springfield 1888 and I will put my Ruger#1 in the corner for awhile.
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Of course, the Winchester, and other takedown leverguns were made to be disassembled for easy transport in a smaller case. I take mine down after every shooting session, in order to clean the barrels from the breech end. Putting back together is a breeze and they are tight as new when the job is done. There is nothing magic, or to be afraid of, about the TDsPisgah wrote:Hot Wild Loads are a thing I avoid in any rifle. But I don't think the takedowns are any weaker in terms of the action than a standard. The "weakness" is in the takedown system. If it is frequently taken down sooner or later the takedown points wear and the barrel/receiver connection gets sloppy -- not desireable, but it has no effect on action lockup. As already mentioned, most all takedown systems have some method of tightening up built in to them. And for most takedowns, there's rarely a genuine reason to take them down, anyway.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
- Rimfire McNutjob
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
- Location: Sanford, FL.
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Amen to that. Makes cleaning so much easier.Mike D. wrote:I take mine down after every shooting session, in order to clean the barrels from the breech end.
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
-
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:28 pm
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
As noted earlier the adjusting screws are there to take up the slack from repeated disassembly, not from firing.
So what are you hunting that a standard velocity 45-70 will not drop?
It always irritates me when folks want to put “hot loads” in their guns… nor no other reason than a bigger fireball.
When I reload my “hunting rounds” it’s always for maximum accuracy achievable out of a particular gun, not maximum velocity, and from my experience max loads in any caliber seldom gives you the best accuracy.
Mike
So what are you hunting that a standard velocity 45-70 will not drop?
It always irritates me when folks want to put “hot loads” in their guns… nor no other reason than a bigger fireball.
When I reload my “hunting rounds” it’s always for maximum accuracy achievable out of a particular gun, not maximum velocity, and from my experience max loads in any caliber seldom gives you the best accuracy.
Mike
- Sixgun
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 18815
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
No difference--Shoot that '86 until the cows come home. Yea, I'm the guy who blew up that '86 but it was a blackpowder '86 that had been fired 2K (by me) with mostly warm to hot loads in my youth. It was metal fatigue.
I have fired tens of thousands of rounds out of original 86's (solid and takedown) with no noticable wear--only a nice clean polishing of their barrels
Your talking about new '86's----You can't wear 'em out in your lifetime unless you do something stupid like pushing 400 gr. bullets to 2400 fps.--------- Takedown or solid frame---------- I personally know of an acquaintence of mine who has shot 4000 rounds of heavy "Buffalo Bore" ammo out of his Miroko '86 and she's as tight as ever.---------Sixgun
I have fired tens of thousands of rounds out of original 86's (solid and takedown) with no noticable wear--only a nice clean polishing of their barrels
Your talking about new '86's----You can't wear 'em out in your lifetime unless you do something stupid like pushing 400 gr. bullets to 2400 fps.--------- Takedown or solid frame---------- I personally know of an acquaintence of mine who has shot 4000 rounds of heavy "Buffalo Bore" ammo out of his Miroko '86 and she's as tight as ever.---------Sixgun
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
I personally know of an acquaintence of mine who has shot 4000 rounds of heavy "Buffalo Bore" ammo out of his Miroko '86 and she's as tight as ever.---------Sixgun[/quote]
WHAT!? How in the world can he afford that? 4000 rds Buffalo Bore = another couple of really nice '86s.
WHAT!? How in the world can he afford that? 4000 rds Buffalo Bore = another couple of really nice '86s.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
- Sixgun
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 18815
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
WHAT!? How in the world can he afford that? 4000 rds Buffalo Bore = another couple of really nice '86s. [/quote]Mike D. wrote:I personally know of an acquaintence of mine who has shot 4000 rounds of heavy "Buffalo Bore" ammo out of his Miroko '86 and she's as tight as ever.---------Sixgun
Mike, For real. You know him too, as do most levergunners on the board------Its "86er" We had some business a year or so ago and we were chatting on the phone. He likes the heavy stuff. -----------Sixgun
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Mike, For real. You know him too, as do most levergunners on the board------Its "86er" We had some business a year or so ago and we were chatting on the phone. He likes the heavy stuff. -----------Sixgun[/quote]Sixgun wrote:WHAT!? How in the world can he afford that? 4000 rds Buffalo Bore = another couple of really nice '86s.Mike D. wrote:I personally know of an acquaintence of mine who has shot 4000 rounds of heavy "Buffalo Bore" ammo out of his Miroko '86 and she's as tight as ever.---------Sixgun
He mostly shoots Grizzly ammo. I keep alot of the empty ammo boxes from him to reuse . And some of the brass .
Ricky
DWWC
DWWC
- Sixgun
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 18815
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Ricky, I was close, wasn't I? I knew it was some kind of heavy stuff. I'm amazed at the pounding he takes from that ammo -----SixgunRKrodle wrote:
He mostly shoots Grizzly ammo. I keep alot of the empty ammo boxes from him to reuse . And some of the brass .
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
I know what you mean, he's shooting it out of a 1886EL, A lot lighter then the standard rifle. I'm 6'3" and about 270lbs, and it aint no way I'm going to pound myself that way. I like the easy stuffSixgun wrote:Ricky, I was close, wasn't I? I knew it was some kind of heavy stuff. I'm amazed at the pounding he takes from that ammo -----SixgunRKrodle wrote:
He mostly shoots Grizzly ammo. I keep alot of the empty ammo boxes from him to reuse . And some of the brass .
Ricky
DWWC
DWWC
- crs
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:32 am
- Location: Republic of Texas
- Contact:
Re: Relative strength of a 1886 takedown Rifle vs Standard Rifle
Hey Sixgun;
What was the load for a 400 grain bullet at 2400 fps? Was it cast or jacketed? What pressure did it generate?
Seriously, 86er, RKrodle, and I have been pushing 450 grain NF solids and Kodiak FMJ to 2000+ through my Miroku TD 1886 .45-90 lately, but we had a good reason. I am sure we can get more velocity, but that should be enough to drop an elephant or cape buffalo nicely. We should know when 86er returns from Africa later this month.
What was the load for a 400 grain bullet at 2400 fps? Was it cast or jacketed? What pressure did it generate?
Seriously, 86er, RKrodle, and I have been pushing 450 grain NF solids and Kodiak FMJ to 2000+ through my Miroku TD 1886 .45-90 lately, but we had a good reason. I am sure we can get more velocity, but that should be enough to drop an elephant or cape buffalo nicely. We should know when 86er returns from Africa later this month.
CRS, NRA Benefactor Member, TSRA, DRSS, DWWC, Whittington Center
Android Ballistics App at http://www.xplat.net/
Android Ballistics App at http://www.xplat.net/