Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
WCF3030
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by WCF3030 »

Pics to come.
Found two 94's one at pawn shop and another at a gun show.
The 1949 is one I had been looking for some time now. I wanted a pre-64 that I could re-blue and re-stock without ruining a vintage rifle. Well someone had taken sand paper to the receiver and looks like at some point they used a screwdriver to pry open the action. Still shoots very well but has lost its collectors value. Paid $220 out the door for it.
The other rifle a 1957 looks near mint but for a gouge in the butt stock. Hopefully the nice stock off the 49 will fit on the 57. That one I paid $300 for.

How did I do? :wink:
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error.

http://thewoodsman1.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Pitchy
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 13146
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:15 am
Location: Minnesooooota

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by Pitchy »

Grats, sounds like you`ll come out all right on those. 8)
Because I Can, and Have
-------------------------------------------------------------
USAF-72-76
God Bless America.
Disclaimer, not responsible for anyone copying or building anything i make.
Always consult an expert first.
woods-walker
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Kentucky

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by woods-walker »

Sounds like you did good. Looking forward to your pictures. BTW I used to spend a fair amount of time hunting and fishing in Oceana County near Shelby. Beautiful country and close to Lake Michigan. Model 94's work well in those wetlands.
3leggedturtle
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by 3leggedturtle »

Sound like really good rifles to find, I luv to find another pre-64 for 300 or less
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres

250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
WCF3030
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by WCF3030 »

woods-walker wrote:Sounds like you did good. Looking forward to your pictures. BTW I used to spend a fair amount of time hunting and fishing in Oceana County near Shelby. Beautiful country and close to Lake Michigan. Model 94's work well in those wetlands.
Hunted Shelby some and yes I'm fond of the lite carbines in the Michigan woods.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error.

http://thewoodsman1.blogspot.com/
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by FatJackDurham »

What is the difference between a 92 and a 94?
User avatar
earlmck
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3453
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:10 am
Location: pert-neer middle of Oregon

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by earlmck »

Oh yes, you did well. That had to be pert near a $200 gouge in that '57 buttstock...
The greatest patriot...
is he who heals the most gullies.
Patrick Henry
3leggedturtle
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by 3leggedturtle »

Lostowl05661 wrote:What is the difference between a 92 and a 94?
92's were a shorter action chambered for 218, 25/20, 32/20 38/40, 44/40 and in newer replica 357, 44mag and 45 colt. M94's were chambered for 32/40, 38/55,30/30, 32WS, 7-30 and similar length cartridges. Too me 92's are lots smoother and handier than 94's. Tho would be hard pressed to pick 1 or the other 3leg
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres

250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32304
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by AJMD429 »

Lostowl05661 wrote:What is the difference between a 92 and a 94?
The 'guts fall out of' the 94, so they can have the longer cartridge work in a sort of medium-length action. They both have the separate exposed locking lugs that slide up beside the rear of the bolt.

I tend to think of the longer-action guns as 'rifles' and the shorter-action 92's as 'carbines', though the terminology isn't really used that way due to variations in barrel and stock length, weight, and other conventions.

I got my first levergun over forty years ago, but had never owned a 94 Winchester until last year...! Since I already had a Marlin .30-30 and .444, I decided to get a Winchester 94 in .375 Winchester; ammo will have to be loaded up this spring for me to be sure if it shoots as good as it looks.

94's definitely feel 'rattlier' than 92's, but they are a 'classic'.

Still, the Marlins (unlike the Winchesters, both short and long actions are made the same) have way fewer parts and are much easier to do kitchen-table gunsmithing on.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Hagler
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:52 am
Location: Leverland, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by Hagler »

Lostowl05661,

The Model 1892 came first. The Model 1894 was designed for smokeless ammunition, and for longer amunition. Both guns are about the same size, but the 94's guts drop out of the bottom of the receiver, when you work the lever, to allow the use of the longer rounds. Here is a comparison of the actions:

Model 92:

Image

Model 94:

Image

Image

While both rifles have some kind of safety incorporated in their designs, the 92 has an internal, firining pin retractor, the 94 has a trigger block:

Model 92:

Image

Model 94:

Image

Also, the 92 has TWO locking lugs, one on either side of the breechbolt, and the 94 has ONE locking lug, behind the breechbolt & in front of the hammer.

Both rifles were used extensively in Cowboy movies, but the 92 became one of the most-used rifles, since it could fire "5-in-1" blanks, just like many sixshooters can. Besides, John Wayne had a 92 in many of his films, and so did Chuck Connors:

Image

Here is an article that tells a bit about the Model 94:

http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-hi ... -receivers

Shawn
"That's right, Billy, I'm good with it. I hit what I shoot at, and I'm fast!"-Lucas McCain, c1882.
ImageImage
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Bought a 1949 and 1957 model 94 over the weekend

Post by FatJackDurham »

Okay, thanks. Is that little lever pin under the stock common to other rifles? I tried one in a store but it was a pain to squeeze the lever to release the hammer.
Post Reply