L. I. B. Danged!

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
Bill in Oregon
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10773
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
Location: The Land of Enchantment

L. I. B. Danged!

Post by Bill in Oregon »

Never would have thought ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eldDP1OQ-nc
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by marlinman93 »

Seems like an odd thing to try to silence. Most people don't use a silencer on a revolver since the cylinder to forcing cone gap will allow noise to escape no matter how good the silencer is. Probably why it didn't see production. A good silenced semiauto .22 would be much more effective.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
Lastmohecken
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2262
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by Lastmohecken »

I remember that it's been said that you couldn't make a silencer work on a revolver because of the cylinder gap. I still seemed loud in the video, but they were shooting it inside, and that would have made it sound louder than outside on the range, etc. I figure they were using high speed long rifle ammo. But I bet if one was to load it with shorts, or subsonic's, it would be fairly quit.
NRA Life Member, Patron
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 34492
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by AJMD429 »

.
I remember when Jerry Miculek put out a 'Covid Cabin Fever' video - He decided to entertain himself and his viewers by rounding up a bunch of expired canned goods from his garage and taking him out back and shooting them. So here we have a world class competitive shooter who's doing the same kind of redneck hillbilly stuff the rest of us do. I thought that was pretty cool.
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
User avatar
gamekeeper
Spambot Zapper
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: Englandistan twinned with the third world.

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by gamekeeper »

I always assumed that the Nagant revolver was the only revolver that could be suppressed although Hollywood disagreed, perhaps for once they were correct :?
17800307948042146153059137863686.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Whatever you do always give 100%........... unless you are donating blood.
Bill in Oregon
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10773
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
Location: The Land of Enchantment

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by Bill in Oregon »

Revolvers with silencers always seemed to me to be a hilarious gaffe, but the Nagant has me scratching my head, due to the revolver's unusual lockup and case design. I'd love to see actual decibel numbers. I owned a couple back in the golden age of surplus and wish I still had one.
User avatar
cas
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Under the giant W

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by cas »

It's not terribly uncommon. People have been putting silencers on revolvers for as long as there have been silencers. (the world over)

It's only our gun culture know it all's who make a big deal out of it. We love to apply a certain logic, but only so far.

Why put a "silencer" on a revolver, the cylinder gap is going to let out gas/noise?
Well why put one on a "high power" :roll: rifle, it's not going to silence the supersonic crack?
Why put one on a semi auto, it's not going to silence the port blast?
Why put one on anything, it's not going to make it silent?
Everything's not 0 or 100, there are things in between.
Slow is just slow.
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 21593
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by Griff »

I would have liked more detail on the face of the cylinder that was pointed out. But, I'd still, like Miculek said, "I want one!"
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by marlinman93 »

cas wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 10:41 am It's not terribly uncommon. People have been putting silencers on revolvers for as long as there have been silencers. (the world over)

It's only our gun culture know it all's who make a big deal out of it. We love to apply a certain logic, but only so far.

Why put a "silencer" on a revolver, the cylinder gap is going to let out gas/noise?
Well why put one on a "high power" :roll: rifle, it's not going to silence the supersonic crack?
Why put one on a semi auto, it's not going to silence the port blast?
Why put one on anything, it's not going to make it silent?
Everything's not 0 or 100, there are things in between.
Silencers work extremely well on semiautos. Not sure what port blast you're referring to? Do you mean some semiauto that has a ported barrel? I can see how that might negate silencer function.
A lot of guns that shoot faster than the sound barrier have a crack the silencer wont eliminate. But those do still get some reduction in sound levels. But often not enough to negate sound to a level you wont need hearing protection. My personal feelings are if I still have to wear hearing protection then why use a silencer. Ear muffs work better.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: L. I. B. Danged!

Post by marlinman93 »

Lastmohecken wrote: Thu May 28, 2026 6:01 pm I remember that it's been said that you couldn't make a silencer work on a revolver because of the cylinder gap. I still seemed loud in the video, but they were shooting it inside, and that would have made it sound louder than outside on the range, etc. I figure they were using high speed long rifle ammo. But I bet if one was to load it with shorts, or subsonic's, it would be fairly quit.
Most modern .22 Shorts are faster than the sound barrier and still crack. But sub sonic .22LR are much milder and have a lower report than high velocity .22 ammo. .22 Short target ammo is almost always lower than the sound barrier and quieter.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
Post Reply