Hornady XTP vs. Speer Deep Curl

[Bill in Oregon]

I have been tempted to play with some of the Deep Curls from Speer in a hunting sixgun on the rare occasions when they make them available. Has anyone here shot them side-by-side? Is one a better choice than the other? We seem to have more field reports of the XTP -- including Jim's use of one in a .41 Magnum on elk. Just kinda wondering on a chilly December morning.

[44shooter]

The 270 grain 44 feeds very smoothly through my Marlin and showed good accuracy. I don’t have any kills with it to report though. I would think it would at least be in the same league as the 300 grain XTP, maybe better I don’t know.

[4t5]

Not me but this guys has .. https://youtu.be/YyVVEVb6oQk?si=1jSEYTeQo2Fd-lOw

[t.r.]

I typically load either the 300 grain XTP or 270 grain Speer bullet with a Harvester sabot cup for my CVA Optima muzzle-loader. Lethal results with either bullet fired into the chest organs of whitetail deer. No bullets have ever been recovered; they blast their way through and out the other side. Wound channels appear identical to me. Hoping this is helpful. TR

[GunnyMack]

Bill, the old Remington 240 semi jacket HP were amazing on deer but they made a real mess from my muzzle loader . I'd really like a soft point for most applications but hps are what they are making. Use either and should be fine on deer type critters.

[mickbr]

Theres no over all rule for XTP when it comes to expansion or toughness, it varies by bullet. Hornadies expansion velocity chart bears no relation to reality either. The 44 cal 200 XTP for example is quite a bit softer than the 240. It will start to open up just under 1000fps so can actually be used for subsonic hunting. Im not sure how low the 240 grain XTP expands but I have been meaning to test it. In the 357, the 125 xtp and 140xtp will not expand subsonically, yet the 158XTP will actually get nose peeling back to 50cal as low as 1020fps or so.

I havent used deep curls but in 44 they are tougher bullet than the 240gn XTP according to reports. My preference in carbines is the 240gn XTP's though as they are still good and have a better lower expansion envelope. They open up to at least 60cal at 1200fps impact. The deep curls need another 100fps. Shots on hogs past 100 where the velocity is dropping the xtp still drops them fast. I need things falling over quick so I can get onto the next one or before they end up on neighboring land. Its why I dont use hardcasts for hogs. Have never seen a hog survive a 240gn XTP.

The below 270 grain loaded in the hammerdown ammo I 'believe' is a speer deep curl ( not my photos btw)

[Ray]

XTP's are easily converted from hollow to soft nose by just holding (needle-noses) up to the lead pot spout very firmly for just long enough for the molten lead to melt the core and top-off the hollow cavitly. With practice......you'll ruin a few.....you can get proficient at it without spilling but just a little lead here and there.

The exposed lead hollow points (sierra speer etc.) can be melted down into the core with a propane torch and the puddle of molten lead beaded at the top of the jacket struck level with a razor blade. Of course, a level, fire proof surface is needed.

[44shooter]

From those pics and velocities, one could assume the 270 grain Speer will likely not expand from a handgun, at least not in the medium they tested these in. That bullet seems pretty tough and some use it in 444 Marlin. The 240 xtp is obviously much softer