On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Made it to the Range this morning. I had loaded 20 each of the .22 Long Rifles with the 38 gr. cast hollow point and the 40 gr. cast flat nose. I used 2.0 gr. Bullseye on all loads.
I started with the 38 gr. cast HP. Shooting 20 yards. This was about average for the 4 groups I fired. I did note that these loads his much closer to the POA than factory high velocity rounds. So I fired 5 on a target and then fired 5 .22 Magnums on the same target, holding the same POA. The Magnums hit a bit higher than my handloads. So now I am gonna have to chronograph them. The 40 gr. cast flat nose seemed more accurate to me. This was the best target of the 3 I shot. I had one failure to fire with the 40 gr. load. I rotated the cartridge and snapped it again but it did not fire. I think the priming compound was bad. I am impressed with the 2.0 gr. Bullseye load and will have to test it more and chronograph it. The bore and chambers stayed clean. The cartridge cases themselves were clean and not smoky. I think it may be a keeper.
I started with the 38 gr. cast HP. Shooting 20 yards. This was about average for the 4 groups I fired. I did note that these loads his much closer to the POA than factory high velocity rounds. So I fired 5 on a target and then fired 5 .22 Magnums on the same target, holding the same POA. The Magnums hit a bit higher than my handloads. So now I am gonna have to chronograph them. The 40 gr. cast flat nose seemed more accurate to me. This was the best target of the 3 I shot. I had one failure to fire with the 40 gr. load. I rotated the cartridge and snapped it again but it did not fire. I think the priming compound was bad. I am impressed with the 2.0 gr. Bullseye load and will have to test it more and chronograph it. The bore and chambers stayed clean. The cartridge cases themselves were clean and not smoky. I think it may be a keeper.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- GunnyMack
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:57 am
- Location: Not where I want to be!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Hey thats not too bad Jim! Any plan to try increasing the load? Decreasing? Or are you just going to call it good?
BROWN LABS MATTER !!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
It's getting close to a compressed load so I most likely won't go any further with Bullseye. I have a couple other powders I want to try and when i get them I will try them. Power Pistol I think is one I don't have.
- GunnyMack
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:57 am
- Location: Not where I want to be!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Ah yes case capacity, wasn't thinking about that!
BROWN LABS MATTER !!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
This is a very cool project. Thanks for tickling my curiosity, it looks like a lot of fun.
†
†
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4145
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
I like to know what the velocity will be also. I keep thinking I need to make a light 22 Hornet for doing what you are accomplishing. Grizz, you need to develop a 78gr Keith type SWC for end to end shooting of coyotes!
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
A friend reports that out of a 6 1/2" TC .22 this load does over 1400 fps.
I would guess that out of my 6 1/2" Single Six they are around 1200.
I would guess that out of my 6 1/2" Single Six they are around 1200.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 8846
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
- Location: Sweetwater, TX
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Keep shooting and reporting, please, Jim. Love this project. You are a handloader's handloader.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4145
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
Jim, that matches the .22 WRF out of a rifle! Great load for squirrels and rabbits with out turning them in stew like a 17hmr or 22mag with holliwpoint do...
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
LOL! the Heavy for Caliber 22 lr. why didn't I think of that ? ? ?3leggedturtle wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 9:27 amI like to know what the velocity will be also. I keep thinking I need to make a light 22 Hornet for doing what you are accomplishing. Grizz, you need to develop a 78gr Keith type SWC for end to end shooting of coyotes!
†
- Ysabel Kid
- Moderator
- Posts: 27790
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: South Carolina, USA
- Contact:
Re: On The Range With the .22 Long Rifle Handloads
I really want to give this a try. I do have the loading tool; just need to find the time.