Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Shasta
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1617
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: Shasta County, the far right stronghold in California

Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Shasta »

As you may know, our fellow levergunner KirkD posted about his newly acquired 1895 Winchester .38-72 with octagon barrel. This caused me to recall a friend having one of those also, and with a bit of horse-trading I managed to get it! I believe it was made in 1898 and is in unmolested condition. It is not as nice as KirkD's, but a fine old rifle just the same, and I owe thanks to KirkD for prompting me to get this rifle. (And thanks Kirk for the great PM's).

Image


The bore shows strong rifling all the way, but some light pitting and scratching is present. Here is the best picture I could get of the bore, along with a nod to Ysabel Kid's technique :D :

Image


The rifle came with an original Winchester .38-72 bullet mould and two boxes of Bertram brass that I had loaded for my friend several years ago using 5744 powder and bullets cast in the original mould. The bullets had been sized to .378, they chambered very easily, and shot terribly! They tumbled so bad that I was hitting ten feet off target at 100 yards! I didn't bother to shoot the second box, I just dismantled them to try again.

First thing I did was clean and slug the bore. Now mind you, I had slugged that same bore several years ago and written it down as being .3795. This time, it slugged .381. I can't explain the difference except that I now have a newer dial caliper than the one I had back then. The closest bullet I had was some .380 Meister Cast 240 grain designed for the .38-55. I loaded five each of four different powder charges and headed back to the range. It has been awhile since I worked with an unknown gun, and I screwed up by not checking the first round I loaded to make sure it chambered. All twenty rounds failed to feed any more than three quarters of the way into the chamber. Back home I go!

I knew my bullet was under bore size, so why the failure to chamber? I decided to make a Cerrosafe chamber casting to see what was going on. Here is the casting with dimensions taken after cooling:

Image


As you can see, the neck area measured an even .400. I measure the case neck thickness and it was .014. Double that to allow for both sides of the case and you get .028. Add that .380 bullet and you get .408, which ain't no way gonna fit into that .400 chamber neck! Thinning the brass might help, but for now I tried something else.

KirkD had sent me a good magazine article by Ken Waters, who had experienced this very thing while doing a write-up on the .38-72 WCF. He beat the problem by switching to jacketed bullets, noting that the other option would be using black powder with a softer bullet that would "bump up" on firing, which he did not want to do. A search of my bullet cabinet turned up a box of Hornady 220 grain .375 caliber jacketed bullets. Great! Back to the reloading press, and to show I learned my lesson, I checked the first round in the gun's chamber. It fell right in! I loaded up five rounds each of two different powders. Hmm, maybe I ought to try some black powder to test that "bump-up" theory. Sixty-five grains of Goex FFg ought to be about right. I used a two foot drop tube to help compress the powder charge, seated a milk carton wad, a 1/16" grease cookie, and another milk carton wad. I sized a 240 grain Lyman 375248 bullet to .376 and seated it. The loaded round was very snug, but it did chamber! I loaded four more for testing and headed to the range.

I shoot five shot groups at fifty yards over a chronograph when testing loads. After getting all set up, I started with a load of 35 grains IMR 3031 under the 220 grain Hornady bullet. First shot went high off target, but on checking through the spotting scope I saw it had gone through the target backer sideways. :x I went to a 6 o'clock hold and fired the other four rounds, only two of which hit the target (both sideways) Velocity was 1797 FPS:

Image


Next I tried the same bullet with 30 grains of Re7. Velocity was 1804, but again the bullets tumbled and I had but two hits on target.

Finally I tried the black powder loads. Unfortunately, the light had gone bad and I couldn't get a read from the chronograph, but all five bullets flew straight! The elevation was perfect, but windage put the group on the right edge of the paper, with two of the shots just off the target.

I gotta say it would not break my heart to have to shoot black powder loads in this rifle. I have a very long history of enjoying both muzzleloading and breechloading black powder guns. I think for now I will try perfecting a black powder and cast lead bullet load as it would be the most cost-effective way for me to enjoy my new .38-72 Winchester.

Further reports to come!


Link to Report #2: http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewt ... =1&t=37503

SHASTA
Last edited by Shasta on Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
California Rifle & Pistol Association LIFE Member
National Rifle Association BENEFACTOR LIFE Member


http://www.hcrpclub.org/schedule.html

avatar pic is Shasta Dam, Shasta Lake, & Mt. Shasta
M. M. Wright
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:57 pm
Location: Vinita, I.T.

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by M. M. Wright »

Great report Shasta!
Glad to see you have already found a load that shows promise. Now, just buy the Sinclair tool and thin those necks to where you can use them.
M. M. Wright, Sheriff, Green county Arkansas (1860)
Currently living my eternal life.
NRA Life
SASS
ITSASS
User avatar
Borregos
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Borregos »

M. M. Wright wrote:Great report Shasta!
Glad to see you have already found a load that shows promise. Now, just buy the Sinclair tool and thin those necks to where you can use them.
Or just thin a few by hand and see how that goes :D
Pete
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
User avatar
KirkD
Desktop Artiste
Posts: 4406
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:52 am
Location: Central Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by KirkD »

Excellent report! You have good, strong rifling in that bore, plenty good for accurate shooting. It looks like the main problem is getting the bullets bumped up to fit the bore. Even then, it is asking quite a bit to bump up a .376 bullet to .381 but your black powder load seems to be doing it. Was there any sign of leading in the bore afterward?

Your neck wall thickness has plenty of meat for thinning. You could thin the walls by at least .003, which would give you an extra .006. If you can chamber a .376 bullet now, you should be able to chamber a .381 bullet no problem once you have thinned those walls. That, coupled with a powder like IMR SR4759 should be able to bump up the bullet another thou to seal off the bore real good. I have a tight chamber as well and am finding that if I put too heavy of a crimp, it slightly bulges out the neck at the crimp, which can make the cartridge difficult to chamber.

I've loaded up 10 rounds with the original cast bullet from that mould and I've used IMR SR4759 because its pressure curve is almost as good as FFg. I'm thinking it should bump up my soft cast bullets real good to seal off the bore. I'm planning a trip to the range at lunch hour and hope to post a report later tonight.

One other thing that might affect chambering with certain bullets is that the rifling lands almost come all the way up to the neck. I'd say almost with 1/8" of the neck, so if the olgive is too fat, the bullet may be hitting the rifling.
Kirk: An old geezer who loves the smell of freshly turned earth, old cedar rail fences, wood smoke, a crackling fireplace on a snowy evening, pristine wilderness lakes, the scent of
cedars and a magnificent Whitetail buck framed in the semi-buckhorn sights of a 120-year old Winchester.
Blog: https://www.kirkdurston.com/
rjohns94
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10820
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: York, PA

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by rjohns94 »

Great report and wonderful rifle. best of luck getting it dialed in!
Mike Johnson,

"Only those who will risk going too far, can possibly find out how far one can go." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
Shasta
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1617
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: Shasta County, the far right stronghold in California

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Shasta »

Kirk,

There was no sign of leading from the black powder rounds, but then again it was only five shots. I did not wipe the bore or use a blow tube to soften fouling, but relied on the grease cookie. Fouling remained soft, but heavy. It took quite a lot of effort to get the bore clean.

I agree that neck turning some cases is in order if I expect to shoot any smokeless, and have started researching methods to accomplish turning. I have arthritis in my hands, and they will not tolerate much twisting motion, so a hand turner likely will not work for me. I am leaning toward a drill mounted version, I just haven't figured out which might be best for me.

SHASTA
California Rifle & Pistol Association LIFE Member
National Rifle Association BENEFACTOR LIFE Member


http://www.hcrpclub.org/schedule.html

avatar pic is Shasta Dam, Shasta Lake, & Mt. Shasta
Nath
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8751
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: England

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Nath »

Nice read fellers.

Thinking out loud and about to sound foolish maybe but could a tool be made to relieve, releive, hmmm my English :roll: open the throut some. A mandrill of sorts????

Nath.
Psalm ch8.

Because I wish I could!
Thunder50
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:18 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Thunder50 »

If you were close, we could run my 38-72 reamer in your chamber and open it up. It was designed to use 405win brass and to be able to chamber a .381" bullet.

Its a great cartridge. You might get some Hawk .377" bullets as the people at Hawk said the cores were soft lead and it should obditurate a bit to work in the .380" bore of my Handi-rifle. Worked very well, as in about 1"@100yds@2,300fps. Should work in your rifle.
The meek shall inherit the earth, but I reserve the mineral rights!
All the knowledge in the world, is of no use to fools! (Eagles-long road out of Eden)
Ben_Rumson
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2569
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:51 pm

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Ben_Rumson »

Nice report Shasta ... Congrats on the BP results...Interesting... I'm surprised with the results using jacketed bullets... Maybe they might have worked at a lower velocity... I’m suspecting there wasn’t enough land to get a decent bite on them at that velocity, or maybe none... I see the groove height is labeled .380" on the chamber cast, what's the land groove depth on it measure out to be? In other words, what's the bore diameter...
My self imposed rule (learned the hard way) in playing with the old ones is always make a chamber cast first before buying anything in the way of components or dies...
"IT IS MY OPINION, AND I AM CORRECT SO DON'T ARGUE, THE 99 SAVAGE IS THE FINEST RIFLE EVER MADE IN AMERICA."
WIL TERRY
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 19272
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Sixgun »

Shasta,
That problem has been with me for close to 40 years. In the description below, I have made a dozen 38-55 rifles shoot fat bullets, along with 40-82's, 40-65's, and dozens of other old calibers I have worked with over the last 4 decades

When a fat loaded bullet does not chamber, mark the neck of the case with a black magic marker---then try to chamber it again. In 95% of the time, you will see that the last 1/4" of the neck (the mouth) has the scratch marks on it, usually the last 1/8".

Try this,
Yea, I've had custom neck reamers made to thin out the neck and it sometimes works.

You can also load your fat bullets and then run the loaded rounds through a FLS part way---yea, take out the decapper. :D This is what works in my 1881 Marlin. So done this gun will shoot beer cans at 200 meters--easily.

This is what always works---------Take ONE case and trim off 1/16" of an inch and load your fat bullet (sans powder,primer :wink: ) and try to chamber it. Keep taking off a 32nd of an inch until it will chamber--it eventually will :D

I have been using 30-30 brass for 38-55's for 25+ years. I just seat the bullet accordingly and everything works out. Some guys will not shoot a rifle because of the headstamp of the case--its just gotta say "38-55". tarts :D

You don't need jacketed bullets. Why pay big time when cast will work-------always, if you know your score--Brylcream. Ha! (old commercial)

I've got 1894's, 1886's and Hi-Walls that have logged 5,000 + rounds and the chambers look fine. I never did have that problem with 1892's or 1895's------------------------------Sixgun
Colt SAA 38-40 95%
Image
Mainehunter
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1026
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Central Maine

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy)

Post by Mainehunter »

Thunder50 wrote:If you were close, we could run my 38-72 reamer in your chamber and open it up. It was designed to use 405win brass and to be able to chamber a .381" bullet.

Its a great cartridge. You might get some Hawk .377" bullets as the people at Hawk said the cores were soft lead and it should obditurate a bit to work in the .380" bore of my Handi-rifle. Worked very well, as in about 1"@100yds@2,300fps. Should work in your rifle.
+1 on the Hawk bullets! I tried them on my vintage Marlin 38-55 with excellent results. I'm also working on a Marlin 40-60 (not mine, my cousins) he just needs to decide on the bullet weight.

Mainehunter :wink:
1cmbg
Levergunner
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Winchester 1895 .38-72 Range Report #1 (long & pic heavy

Post by 1cmbg »

Kirk, seeing that you live in Ontario, as do I, was wondering where you have been getting cast bullets for 38/72? Specifically I have been looking for some sized .382. I have been using 38/55 255 grain cast .380 but my model 95 barrel really needs .382. Cheers and thanks in advance. Omer.
Post Reply