30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
86er
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Republic of Texas

30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by 86er »

Yesterday I got just 7 Nosler Partitions from a guy at work. I had the Speer Hot Core 170 gr bullets already. I decided to compare them side by side. My thoughts were that if the NP was noticably better I'd go buy them for hunting purposes.

The load was exactly the same, 30.5 gr H4895 (some book show this as max) with a CCI 250M in FC cases (once fired). The only difference was the bullets, however they are both 170 grain. The listed velocity is 2138 fps (where do they get these seemingly precise #'s?). I did not chrono the loads because it didn't matter how fast they were going, only that theoretically they should be the same velocity or very close.

The range was 50 yards. The back-stop was 2 phone books around 3 inches thick, wet (from the hose) but not soaked. Behind the phone books was a cardboard box with assorted magazines, soft covered books, newspapes and other paper material. These were dry. Last was a 3/4" sheet of plywood.

I shot 7 NP's on the left half of the target area . I tried to recover bullets after 3 shots. The first 2 NP's went too low. The last one went off to the side and exited to parts unknown. So in the end I had 4 NP's to examine. Based on that, I only shot 4 Speers on the right half of the target area.

My initial thought was that the NP's would penetrate further. I also expected a mushroom shape but later realized I was thinking about the Swift A-Frame design where the front is bonded. So that was not a realistic expectation (that I quickly realized) just mixed my thoughts.

The conclusion in this very limited comparison was:
1) both bullets penetrated the same amount (no more than 30 pages variance between any of the recovered bullets), 2) the NP's all lost the entire front (the "partition" can be seen on the front with a little dimple in it, no lead), 3) the NP's were short (front is gone) and narrow (expanded part, if it did, came off), 4) the NP's weighed less than the Speers (less lead intact), 5) the Speers expanded quite a bit (looked like lead balls with the jacket inside), 6) You can pick the Speers jacket and lead apart with fingernails and separate them with some effort.

This was NOT what I expected. So while I had heard and was led to believe the Nosler Partition is the way to go for larger game if you were inclined to use the 30-30 on bear, moose, etc it seems the Nosler Partition may actually be the better bullet for deer sized game! A deer is softer than my test material so either bullet at 50 yds would likely have exited a deer. The NP may make a bigger mess inside due to the front breaking up and shearing off. On the other hand, maybe the speer would expand to a much larger size while staying together and actually be more effective. The whole thing is so "6 of one, half dozen of the other" that I'm just going to shoot the Speer's since they're half the price, and see how it goes when the deer or hogs show up. Any comments? (Like you guys are shy with your opinions :lol: )

Speer on the Left, Nosler Partition on the Right
Image
Image
Last edited by 86er on Wed May 19, 2010 4:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Professional Hunter
http://www.TARSPORTING.com
"Worldwide Hunting Adventures"

Professional Hunters Assoc of South Africa
SCI - Life Member
NRA - Life Member
NAHC - Trophy Life Member
DWWC - Member
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP

Post by Hobie »

IME the Speers and Sierras will penetrate a 150 lb deer stem to stern quartering through all possible bone and gut. I can't imagine that the Noslers would be "better". I know that lots of people use any given thing because it makes them "feel" better and I don't see anything wrong with that.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
FWiedner
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP

Post by FWiedner »

Hobie wrote:I know that lots of people use any given thing because it makes them "feel" better...
I'm not sure that my bullet selection method is quite so objective...

:oops:
Government office attracts the power-mad, yet it's people who just want to be left alone to live life on their own terms who are considered dangerous.

History teaches that it's a small window in which people can fight back before it is too dangerous to fight back.
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20803
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP

Post by Griff »

Joe,

Those are the same things I've heard about the Noslers. I've just never lost an animal w/Federal 150 factory loads, so never had the inclination to test. Great info.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Nath
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8660
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: England

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP

Post by Nath »

Joe, I ain't surprised with your findings, a freind of mine stopped using partions in his 270 because the nose made to much mess when used on deer.

I only ever used the speer bullets in mt 30/30 on deer. They all but one exited and made just enough damage, they also are as you know the most sleek of the flat points. Work well in 308W too.

Good work Joe.

Nath.
Psalm ch8.

Because I wish I could!
Bigahh
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: N.E. Wisconsin

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Bigahh »

Very interesting stuff Joe! I am with Hobie somewhat on this as far as a 30-30. With the velocities being what they are in this caliber I do not believe in my mind that any bullet would penetrate a great deal more than any other. Now if the caliber changes to a much higher velocity cartridge like maybe a 300 Win Mag my mind changes a bit on the subject. That is my feelings on this right or wrong.
User avatar
horsesoldier03
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2059
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by horsesoldier03 »

Yep those fancy bullets are all overrated IMO! 170 grn Corelokts will do it every time for me.
“Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.”
User avatar
Sarge
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 864
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:54 am
Location: MO

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Sarge »

Thanks for the report, 86'er.

Come to think of it, I don't believe I've ever recovered a 150 grain Winchester or Sierra SP from a deer either, and I've seen about a heaping pickup load of the them fall to one or the other. That's the beauty of the old 30 WCF, enough velocity for decent trajectory and good effect; but not so much that it won't work with any decent bullet.

IMO what's needed, for max penetration in this caliber, is a good 175 grain MFJ with a heavy jacket and a big, flat snout on it. Shame nobody makes one or at least nobody I've been able to locate.
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
m.wun
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: S.Cal

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by m.wun »

I recently shot into soaked magazines with 170gr PP win. and then shot with 308win
150gr bonded core.The diffrance in penetration was only about a inch.The bonded bullet
was more violent because of velocity but the 30-30 still penetrated.
What in the wild world of sports is going on here
RANisbet
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:37 pm
Location: Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
Contact:

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by RANisbet »

I and my sons used to use 189 grain Noslers in our 30-06s at max velocity, until we had 3 elk and a moose take killing shots at under 50 yards and then run as if they were just scared, and 2 were never to be seen again. The 3rd elk took the first shot from the side through both lungs. A 30 cal hole going in and a 30 cal hole out the other side. The elk then turned and ran straight toward my son. Second shot was throught the brisquit into the heart. That bullet was recovered in the heart and was nothing but a 30 cal billet, the back half of the Nosler. It's penetration was not that great in my opinion!!!
Bob Nisbet
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8248
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by TedH »

Those 170 Speers always seemed like a good tough bullet to me. No need to spend the big bucks on those Partitions.
NRA Life Member
2X22
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 933
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:08 am
Location: Salmon Creek, SW Washington

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by 2X22 »

I've always been a huge fan of Speers bullets. Just plain killed too many critters with them not to be. Loaded and used both the 150's and 170's in the 30-30 with fantastic success over the years amongst many other calibers.

My FIL was a giant NP fan for years. Then he moved to Alaska and saw them fail miserably on moose, and the really big black bears of Prince Wales. After a trip back down to visit we discussed it and I talked him into trying some Speers. A few years later he reported 100% success on everything he hunted.

2x22
"Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Rimfire McNutjob
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Sanford, FL.

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Rimfire McNutjob »

Looks like a good reason to stick with Swift if you're going to load a partition style bullet.
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
jlchucker
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 542
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by jlchucker »

horsesoldier03 wrote:Yep those fancy bullets are all overrated IMO! 170 grn Corelokts will do it every time for me.
170 grain Corelocts and Winchester Powerpoints.The Ranchdog 170 grain and Lyman 311041 work just as well-- Really all anybody needs in this caliber. Non-exotic ammo has worked quite well in the 30-30 for over a century.
User avatar
fordwannabe
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3369
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:52 am
Location: Womelsdorf PA

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by fordwannabe »

I was about to mention some old heated up highway debris has worked pretty well for a few guys for a few years. I like the RCBS design more than the lyman though. Tom
a Pennsylvanian who has been accused of clinging to my religion and my guns......Good assessment skills.
brno602
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:03 pm
Location: Alberta Rocky's

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by brno602 »

I am a big fan of the Nozler Part I have used them on lot's of Game from Deer to Moose and one Big Bear.
Yes they do open fast and they do lose almost half their wieght. But they always work and on a Close range Elk it is nice to have the back half of the bullet pass through.
In a 30/30 though I don't know afterall 30/30 bullets are all ment for the same Velocity I like the Hornady 170gr.Not like loading the same bullet for the Ultra mag and .300 savage
But too be honest I have never had a regular bullet fail on me except for the first Hornady SST's I shot two Deer with my .280 and both times the bullet did strange things! One Blew up and took out only one lung the other Change direction and went strait up 90°
The one with one lung, freaked me out as I have never had a deer go more than 40 yrds on me after a hit!Had to shoot it twice!
I like the Remington Core loct in a 150gr for all my 7mms it just works well. I have also shot the Rem CL 165gr .308 and pushed it to over 3400fps I took a huge WT buck and found the bullet lost about 50% of it's weight and was flat as a pancake under the hide on the off side at 175yds. Now the best bullet I have tested in Wet paper was the Old CIL Kling Core Soft Piont You can see the Crimp on the bullet and Dam they work good! and best thing is they made a 30/30 bullet too.By Crimp I mean they have notches in the back half just under the crimping grove a really well thought out bullet!
I still have that CL will have to find it and take a pic.
Bullets like Trucks and Women We all like some and hate the others lol!
Now here is a tip you need a best friend and hunting buddy like I have that will try and test every new bullet on game I have such a friend, it took 20 years but now he is starting to think Dam I should just stick to one! plus he is a one gun hunter 06 for everything, he has now stuck to a 165gr Sierria for Deer and a 200gr Speer for Elk and Moose with the 180gr Nozler as a second choice. Gee it only took him 22 years of playing around!!!
brno602
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:03 pm
Location: Alberta Rocky's

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by brno602 »

I will get a pic of a KKSP in 160gr 7mm and my REM CL when I get home later today.
3leggedturtle
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by 3leggedturtle »

Aren't the NP's s'posed to let the front half expand quickly and violently. While the rear half continues on, and penetrates to the off side or completely thru?
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres

250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
86er
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by 86er »

Yes 3LT they the NP are supposed to do that. These acted accordingly in my test, but I was caught off guard because I expected them to penetrate more than traditional cup and core bullets.
Professional Hunter
http://www.TARSPORTING.com
"Worldwide Hunting Adventures"

Professional Hunters Assoc of South Africa
SCI - Life Member
NRA - Life Member
NAHC - Trophy Life Member
DWWC - Member
shdwlkr
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:35 am

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by shdwlkr »

86er
Interesting to find that the nosler is really not as good as anything else out there. I have moved from jacketed to lead bullets because I can have better access to the weight bullet I want by just casting either heavier or lighter weight bullet.
I have some noslers for my 270 but they are old maybe 20 years plus now and I may never shoot them now.
I do like my 30-30 and would take anything that came at me with my 173 grain lead bullets and not feel under powered up to the grizzley and then I am not sure you can have to much gun. If I were going where they lived I would take my 45-70 and 425 grain bullets if that didn't stop the bear then it was my time to leave this earth.
In a free society the government doesn't fear its citizens
NRA Endowment member
DAV
brno602
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:03 pm
Location: Alberta Rocky's

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by brno602 »

I will get some pic's up as soon as the wife comes home and tells me why the computer is not talking to the Camera. I really want to get the pics of a Kling Core soft point up, maybe the best soft point ever made!
P.S
I am a hard core Nosler Part guy they always work for me.
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by O.S.O.K. »

Interesting, I too regarded the 30-30 partition as a controlled expansion for deep penetration type bullet.

I think really though, if there ever was a cartridge that fully utilizes the cup and core technology, its the 30 W.C.F.

I have always used Speers but I guess they're dropping their standard bullets in favor of the new bonded ones. I guess as long as they expand the same, that'll be OK - though they cost a lot more.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
brno602
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:03 pm
Location: Alberta Rocky's

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by brno602 »

That's what I am thinking the 30/30 and .303 only have bullets made for the 30/30,303 I mean the real .303 British round the 2200 to 2500 fps The cup and core bullets always get the job done heck I have pushed the .30 cal 165gr Rem at 3400fps and it got the job done, but I would not want it for a Elk Moose bullet in my gun.
Still waiting for the better half to help me with my comp problem.It's girls night out today lol
I keep looking at that 160gr Kling Core soft point and thinking dam they had a good bullet I have used them in .270 to .308.
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Malamute »

I think the Nosler Partitions have their place, but for the 30-30 it may be a bit overengineered for the task at hand. as has been mentioned, the 30-30 doesnt go fast enough to tear up standard type bullets. The higher velocity round can and sometimes do tear up standard type bullets, so the Partition comes into it's niche in that instance. They allow a wide range of velocities (and therefore a wide range of distances with good bullet peformance) without having the bullet come apart completely close in, and will still open up at longer range. That's just not what we usually do with a 30-30, so within it's most used velocity range, the standard bullets do fine.

Years ago, I shot some Speer and Hornady 170's into wet lap. The Hornady's expanded a little more on the several I shot, and the Speers slightly less. Looked like the Speers were slightly tougher bullets, but that isnt a very representative sample. The Hornady's expanded back to about 1/2 the length of the bullet, the Speers expanded about 1/3 of the way back. The few I've shot into deer or other critters went right through, so I can't say much about how they do in animals, except they both seem to work.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
BigSky56
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2356
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: NW Montana

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by BigSky56 »

the original 30-30 noslers weren't partition but cup and core I guess the lure of premium bullets and prices took hold of shooters and nosler. 30-40 krag 30-30 and 300 savage have been killing deer, elk and moose since they came out 80 to 100+ years ago, just hit them in the lungs from the side or quartering dont try it between the hams and you'll put meat on the table. danny
pharmseller
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Willamette Valley, OR, USA

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by pharmseller »

Malamute wrote:I think the Nosler Partitions have their place, but for the 30-30 it may be a bit overengineered for the task at hand. as has been mentioned, the 30-30 doesnt go fast enough to tear up standard type bullets. The higher velocity round can and sometimes do tear up standard type bullets, so the Partition comes into it's niche in that instance. They allow a wide range of velocities (and therefore a wide range of distances with good bullet peformance) without having the bullet come apart completely close in, and will still open up at longer range. That's just not what we usually do with a 30-30, so within it's most used velocity range, the standard bullets do fine.

Years ago, I shot some Speer and Hornady 170's into wet lap. The Hornady's expanded a little more on the several I shot, and the Speers slightly less. Looked like the Speers were slightly tougher bullets, but that isnt a very representative sample. The Hornady's expanded back to about 1/2 the length of the bullet, the Speers expanded about 1/3 of the way back. The few I've shot into deer or other critters went right through, so I can't say much about how they do in animals, except they both seem to work.
Well stated.
I shot a 5 point Rocky Mountain bull a while ago with 180 grain green box .30-06 bullets. Around 60 yards. None of the bullets exited, but the bull only went a few yards. Successful.
A few years later I shot another 5 point with a 180 grain NP from a 300 WBY. That bullet might still be going for all I know. The bull took about six steps and fell over.
A couple of years after that I shot another 5 point (Roosy this time) with the same load. I recovered that bullet after it transversed nearly the entire length of the bull.
About three years after that I shot through another 5 point with a hot 30-06 NP 180 grain load. He was moving out or he might have been DRT. Still, I won't argue over 20 yards.
I use NP exclusively, but at hot 30-06 and 300 WBY velocities.

P
We are determined that before the sun sets on this terrible struggle, our flag will be recognized throughout the world as a symbol of freedom on the one hand, of overwhelming power on the other.

General George C. Marshall, 1942
User avatar
KWK
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1389
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:31 am
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by KWK »

This is purely speculation on my part, but perhaps Nosler makes the front section of their .30-30 Partition extra soft (by Partition standards) to ensure expansion at longer ranges. Nosler seems to know their business, so perhaps they put a little extra effort into this design.
Drawdown
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 578
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:19 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Drawdown »

I was browsing Midway, and they had the 170gr Nosler Partition for 30-30 @ little under $40 a box. These are usually $55-60, so I ordered 2 boxs=100. Did a search, found this old thread, a good one, and confirmed what I already knew from experience, the Win PP & Rem CL, Speer HC has about been perfection on deer and such in the 30-30! But these are a bullet with a great rep, I'll save em for later, done got everything covered in my loads.
There was a very good article in latest issue of FF&G, about Bringing enough gun, Moose-Bear and so forth, but written by a northern guide with what appears plenty experience.? But he mentions that Jack O'Connor wrote of a guy in ?state, that took 17 elk with one 20rd box of factory 30-30 ammo. Great article and had to bring this thread back up!
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life"

"Better drawdown Alvin!"
"If you gotta shoot, shoot don't talk"
Conservative since day one and until the last!
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 31939
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by AJMD429 »

fordwannabe wrote: Thu May 20, 2010 11:19 am I was about to mention some old heated up highway debris has worked pretty well for a few guys for a few years. I like the RCBS design more than the lyman though. Tom
I have not had enough hunting experience other than whitetail deer and feral dogs and other barnyard predators to say much other than I've never had a hard cast lead bullet fail me on those kind of animals, and the Winchester semi-jacketed soft point 240 grain 44 Mag bullet has also been very dependable making an entrance and exit wound in whitetails without much debris.

From what I have read it seems like hard cast lead works for most bigger animals using the over-40 calibers, unless you have to get super penetration in which case it seems to make sense to go with bronze solids. But all that is from reading what others who've been there and done that write.

Still nice to see an honest side-by-side of a couple of well-known hunting bullets available to us, and I appreciate the post quite a bit.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Scott Tschirhart
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3840
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Scott Tschirhart »

I think the Remington Corlocked 170 gr bullet should do the job on most hunting needs and that is pretty much what I rely on.

However, for police work I preferred the old (and unfortunately discontinued) 170 gr Winchester Silvertip. It did well on penetration of body panels and windshields and I think it had a reputation as a tougher bullet (though I had no complaints about how it did on hogs).

I don't see a need for solid bullets in a .30-30 as soft points seem to do the job as intended.
gcs
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:42 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by gcs »

FWIW, there was a picture on one of these lever sites of 2, 170 corelokts recovered from a moose, almost complete penetration, yes, the moose was dead...lol
The 2 slugs were the most perfect mushroom shape you'd ever see, any one of them would have killed the moose,.

Another guy an Aussie, showed 2 "brush bulls" feral cattle bulls, that he had taken with 150gr. factory ammo out of his 30-30.

Not sure how much more power or penetration is required.
stretch
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2285
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by stretch »

Yep those fancy bullets are all overrated IMO! 170 grn Corelokts will do it every time for me.
I gotta agree with others on this thread - the CoreLokt is THE standard in a big game bullet.
It's been around for 90 years or so, but it was done right. Some bullets have a better ballistic
coefficient, and other have been tweaked to expand differently, but the CoreLokt ALWAYS seems
to work.

-Stretch
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20803
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Griff »

Still a good read these many years later... I still find the 150 grain Federal PowerShok sufficient for my deer or havelina hunting, or for coyote control.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Drawdown
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 578
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:19 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Drawdown »

I shot this buck at aprox 50yds with a 150g Rem CL from a Marlin when the shot finally came in heavy brush. It went in center of right front shoulder, busted the left shoulder and I found the bullet in 2 pieces right against the hide. When I pulled the trigger the bucks nose hit ground, both front legs useless, his hind legs just plowing like a riverboat. He was slightly uphill of me, and when he finally gave it up he was almost at my feet. He was a big deer I'm sure close to 200 pound.
20220430_072347.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life"

"Better drawdown Alvin!"
"If you gotta shoot, shoot don't talk"
Conservative since day one and until the last!
Drawdown
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 578
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:19 pm

Re: 30-30 170gr NP vs. 170 Speer FP PICS added

Post by Drawdown »

The Rem CL is on top, and the bottom is a 150g Win PP, that actually probably performed even better? The deer was within 10 yds of me, and I shot right at back edge of the left shoulder, missing it, but the bullet went almost full length, and broke the hind right leg completely, the deer hit the ground crippled. I put another in the boiler room to finish the job.
I consider both bullet performance on these two deer about perfect. But I haven't been able to find either bullet since 2019! I think I prefer the 170's, but not so sure, because the 150's have been excellent. I shot the 150's in my Marlin because they shot best, and already had the 150g Win ammo, for a deer I killed with about the same performance in 2019 out of my Mod 64, but it exited, never found it.
20220430_072227.jpg
The Rem CL on the left and PP on right.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life"

"Better drawdown Alvin!"
"If you gotta shoot, shoot don't talk"
Conservative since day one and until the last!
Post Reply