Burn rate of powder.....

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
hightime
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1002
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 9:22 am
Location: Duluth, MN

Burn rate of powder.....

Post by hightime »

Doesn't it make sence to use a slower burn rate in a long rifle barrel and a faster in a pistol or short rifle?
My 24'' rifle barrel seems to be tight near the chamber then open up towards the muzzle. I'm going to try a slower burning powder and see if the longer burn will better seal the bullet in the second half of it's barrel travel.
I tried the other way with Trail Boss and didn't like it. I think that will work good in the pistols.

Owen
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Blaine »

You'll know by the unburnt powder, and dirt... (flame suit on) published loads, though :lol:
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14885
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by J Miller »

Naw, try 35grs of 3F black powder and a Lyman 454190 filled with SPG and it will work great. :P


Seriously, I've tried IMR 4227 and Hogdgens 5744 and both of them leave lots of unburned kernels of powder in the barrel and action. You've got to push them up to Ruger level loads using a mag primer to get any kind of cleanliness from them.

Now, I don't mind soot or that oily goo left behind by some bullet lube - powder combos, but I draw the line at getting showered with unburned powder every time I eject a fired case. And that is what happens when I use these types of powders in standard pressure .45 Colt loads.

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Hobie »

hightime wrote:Doesn't it make sence to use a slower burn rate in a long rifle barrel and a faster in a pistol or short rifle?
My 24'' rifle barrel seems to be tight near the chamber then open up towards the muzzle. I'm going to try a slower burning powder and see if the longer burn will better seal the bullet in the second half of it's barrel travel.
I tried the other way with Trail Boss and didn't like it. I think that will work good in the pistols.

Owen
I love this sort of question which has been oft discussed here.

Faster powders will better "bump up" the bullet base (we're talking cast bullets here). That's one reason to use them. Slower powders don't bump up the bullet further down the bore, what happens is the bullet goes through the tight portion and then is too small for the big portion of the barrel further down.

If you're concerned about ballistic performance my experience is that generally what gives the best velocity in one length barrel in a given cartridge will do the same in any other length barrel. Yes, there are exceptions, there are always exceptions but they call them exceptions for a reason. :wink:

If you don't like something that's just fine. There's lots of reasons one prefers one powder over another and it doesn't need to be logical. One guy told me he preferred one particular powder in one particular cartridge because of how it smelled after firing. Be glad you live, for now, in a country that offers you so many choices.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
jager3
Levergunner
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:21 pm

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by jager3 »

Hightime - I have recently settled on SR4759 in my 1873 Short Rifle. My best load is 17.0gr with a Lee 255FN cast with no "blow by" or discernible leading and is a Lyman "book" load. I'm "clocking" right at 1375 (+ or - 8fps). I'm also using WLP primers and Starline brass. I've also had good accuracy with 18.8gr/IMR4227, but lower velocity; and 16.5gr/2400, but greater velocity "spreads" and a bit "dirtier" barrel (yeah, I know it can't compare to BP :) ).
User avatar
hightime
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1002
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 9:22 am
Location: Duluth, MN

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by hightime »

Well my replacement gun came and I sent it right back. I'll get to try some of these things in a week or so.
Thanks Hobie, is what your saying it's better to bump up the bullet early. I was thinking that I needed it to expand a bit down the barrel, at least with the gun I had. But what I think I understand from you , I might not get that good fit if the burn rate is slower.
I just came in from loading twenty rounds of slower burn. I probably wasted my time.... No way, it's all fun.

jager3, I'm seeing variations in Uberti barrels. I would think that's why one load works for some and not others.
I'm sure some are saying ''Da''.
Owen
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20864
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Griff »

There are many variables in such a calculation. There are several "rules-of-thumb", but no real "cast-in-concrete" solutions.

I was taught, and subsequently verified by experimentation (for a couple of my guns), that to obtain maximum velocity, the adage that slow powders in long barrels will yield higher velocities with lower pressures. However, they may not always yield the best accuracy. Quick burning powders may exhibit similar paradoxes in short barrels.

I use a lot of RedDot in my .45Colts, that's after using 231, Unique, #2, Clays, and a couple of others (well, ok... maybe up to a ½-dozen others).

Back several years... maybe 18 or 19, I wrote to Accurate and asked them for load data with 5744 for the following cartridges: 12 ga., .30-30, .45 Colt, & .40-90SBN with specific bullet weights I then currently used. They gave me the data, then said something along the lines of, "... you will probably not be happy attempting to use these loads in a couple of your cartridges." And I wasn't, although I admit, I never tried it in the shotgun. 5744 has its uses in big voluminous rifle cases of the BP era... not the relatively smaller pistol cases.

Although I use a fairly light load, (6.5 grs.) of RedDot in my .45Colt, I'm loading it mostly for CAS and lighter than traditional bullets. It gives excellent accuracy and I've had not issues with positioning or temperature, unlike what some other powders exhibit in light loadings. I have worked up heavier loads, and accuracy didn't suffer, but recovery time from recoil increased, and that's not conducive to performance in timed events.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
6pt-sika
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by 6pt-sika »

Hobie wrote: Faster powders will better "bump up" the bullet base (we're talking cast bullets here).

"Obturate" is the word you may have been looking for !
Parkers , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s , 6.5mm's and my family in the Philippines !
User avatar
6pt-sika
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by 6pt-sika »

Now on the other hand , if your bullet is large enough to fill the bore "obturation" is not as important .

Just today I fired some 444 loads for SubSonic using the RD 432-300GC as well as my MM/RD 432-325GC bullet . Both pushed with TrailBoss . Both did okay for what I was wanting although not tack drivers by any stretch .
Parkers , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s , 6.5mm's and my family in the Philippines !
User avatar
6pt-sika
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by 6pt-sika »

Griff wrote:Back several years... maybe 18 or 19, I wrote to Accurate and asked them for load data with 5744 for the following cartridges: 12 ga., .30-30, .45 Colt, & .40-90SBN with specific bullet weights I then currently used. They gave me the data, then said something along the lines of, "... you will probably not be happy attempting to use these loads in a couple of your cartridges." And I wasn't, although I admit, I never tried it in the shotgun. 5744 has its uses in big voluminous rifle cases of the BP era... not the relatively smaller pistol cases.

I used XMP5744 for several years in a broad spectrum of cartridges with cast bullets for hunting , silhouettes and paper .

Think the smallest I used it in was the 25-36 Marlin and the largest was the 45-70 .

My go to silhouette load for several years was 22 grains of XMP5744 with the Ranch Dog 311-165GC .

Using 5744 with cast I killed deer using the following cartridges . 30-30 , 32 Special , 356 WIN , 375 WIN , 38-56 , 40-65 , 444 and 45-70 . IF I hadn't gone overboard and started messing with the heavyweights in the 444 and 45-70 I'd most likely still be shooting mostly 5744 with cast . But once you get to a certain projectile weight in both cartridges you need to push uhm fast to make uhm stabalize or thats been what I've found to be true !
Parkers , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s , 6.5mm's and my family in the Philippines !
Don McDowell

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Don McDowell »

Alot depends on powder capacity and bore ratio of the case, the shape of the case and the weight of the bullet.
But assuming in this example we're talking about a 45 colt, 44wcf or similar, you'll be hard pressed to find better powders for velocity and accuracy than bludot,2400, and 5744. Unless of course you do the cartridge proper and just go with a good 3f blackpowder.
User avatar
hightime
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1002
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 9:22 am
Location: Duluth, MN

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by hightime »

Don, I'm going to take a look at the burn rates of those, my books are out in the shop, but I'm thinkin' all those are middle of the chart. I don't have Blue Dot. I do have some 2400 and IMR 4198.
I have to go get my another 45 rifle, so when one is away the other can play.

Owen
Cliff
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:55 am

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Cliff »

If this gun,rifle, or handgun is tight infront of the chamber in the barrel itself, you will probably want to lap or polish the tight spot out. A lot of todays guns are crush fit on the barrel to the frame. Squeezes the barrel a bit. A qood quality barrel will be tapered from chamber to the muzzle, just a slight reduction, common of some european rifles, 22's and such. It was common at one time for custom barrel makers to lap their barrels to achieve this effect. Todays production demands make it hard to be done right. There may be another way which is to relieve the rifling the length of the restriction if it is not all that long. A good reamer can smooth it out until it matches the rest of the barrel. But once the bullet passes the restriction the pressure pushing it is going down and no bumping or obturation will happen.
You may need a good cast of the barrel immediately at the chamber end of the barrel, cerrosafe is best and works well if used as intended. Almost all powders whether slow or fast rated is usually comsumed in the cartridge case before the bullet leaves the chamber. Powder depends on pressure to burn properly, once the pressure drops the powder fizzles more or less. Just Saying. All the best in your search.
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Hobie »

6pt-sika wrote:
Hobie wrote: Faster powders will better "bump up" the bullet base (we're talking cast bullets here).

"Obturate" is the word you may have been looking for !
He used "bump up" so I did too. I'm trying not to confuse him further. :wink: :lol:
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: Burn rate of powder.....

Post by Hobie »

Cliff wrote:If this gun,rifle, or handgun is tight infront of the chamber in the barrel itself, you will probably want to lap or polish the tight spot out. A lot of today's guns are crush fit on the barrel to the frame. Squeezes the barrel a bit. A good quality barrel will be tapered from chamber to the muzzle, just a slight reduction, common of some European rifles, 22's and such. It was common at one time for custom barrel makers to lap their barrels to achieve this effect. Today's production demands make it hard to be done right. There may be another way which is to relieve the rifling the length of the restriction if it is not all that long. A good reamer can smooth it out until it matches the rest of the barrel. But once the bullet passes the restriction the pressure pushing it is going down and no bumping or obturation will happen.
You may need a good cast of the barrel immediately at the chamber end of the barrel, cerrosafe is best and works well if used as intended. Almost all powders whether slow or fast rated is usually consumed in the cartridge case before the bullet leaves the chamber. Powder depends on pressure to burn properly, once the pressure drops the powder fizzles more or less. Just Saying. All the best in your search.
Good points Cliff and well said. Saved me some typing, too! :!:
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Post Reply