Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Post by **Old Savage** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:56 pm

For certain individuals?????

rjohns94 · Post by **rjohns94** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:00 pm

what are you referring to???

FWiedner · Post by **FWiedner** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:03 pm

There is and has always been.

Rimfire McNutjob · Post by **Rimfire McNutjob** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:05 pm

I must have missed something.

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:12 pm

rjohns94 wrote:what are you referring to???

Those that like .444 and those that like 45-70.......

rjohns94 · Post by **rjohns94** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:17 pm

BlaineG wrote:
rjohns94 wrote:what are you referring to???
Those that like .444 and those that like 45-70.......

OHHHHHHHH Definately!!!!!!!

Post by **Ysabel Kid** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:17 pm

BlaineG wrote:
rjohns94 wrote:what are you referring to???
Those that like .444 and those that like 45-70.......

Otto · Post by **Otto** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:27 pm

How 'bout that weather?

TedH · Post by **TedH** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:35 pm

We all know the 45-70 is the only one worth having. That little 444 is just a wannabe.

2ndovc · Post by **2ndovc** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:38 pm

Well I'm hoping it was scantily clad Ladies that were the reason here!

OS is my hero in that catagory!!

jb

TedH · Post by **TedH** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:39 pm

OS is everybody's hero when it comes to the ladies!

mod71alaska · Post by **mod71alaska** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:59 pm

BlaineG wrote:
rjohns94 wrote:what are you referring to???
Those that like .444 and those that like 45-70.......

No, those that like 30-30 and those that like .32WS. Don't go stirring up trouble, Blaine!!! Everyone knows that!

Post by **Old Savage** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:44 pm

Well, I am headed to a 40th college reunion in Wilkes Barre, wondered if old girlfriends should be treated differently if you haven't seen them in 40 years and your wife hasn't met them than is she has.

Never know where you guys will head with an open ended question.

pwl44m · Post by **pwl44m** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:03 pm

I prefer 444 Marlin, partly because that is what I have,and partly because that is what I have. Had a 45-70 in a Ruger #1 years ago- never even fired it. Sure was HOT (whoops ) in Nor Cal today.

Streetstar · Post by **Streetstar** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:12 pm

Old Savage wrote:Well, I am headed to a 40th college reunion in Wilkes Barre, wondered if old girlfriends should be treated differently if you haven't seen them in 40 years and your wife hasn't met them than is she has. Never know where you guys will head with an open ended question.

Geez OS, how many ex-gf's are we talkin here?

But in reality, i would think after a few years, your wife has probably developed a thick skin to a lot of your past antics, much as mine has . I've thought similar thoughts before -- but only about 1 or 2 other ladies, not a early 70's Glen Campbell'esque harem or anything. Turned out the ladies in question had similar trepidation about encountering me and mine after so long too

and my wife took it all in stride, reminding me that i married an amazing woman

Hopefully everyone can keep it civil and you can relax afterward with a highball of Jeremiah Weed, in quiet contemplation about how good life is !

olyinaz · Post by **olyinaz** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:41 am

Otto wrote:...How 'bout that weather?

But to Fred I have to answer no, there really shouldn't be. That said, I'm a guest here and I thank the host and moderators for maintaining what is one of the best sites on the internet.

And by the way [SNORT!] everyone knows it's .30WCF! .32WS indeed...

Cheers,
Oly

Post by **Old Savage** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:39 am

Four, she knows two and doesn't know the other two. One we vacation with and two of them don't talk to me. One won't, she says she is heart sick that I am a Republican and one really isn't allowed to but she will be there. It is all a little complicated.

El Chivo · Post by **El Chivo** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:16 am

I would say be effusive and enthusiastic but no tongues.

firefuzz · Post by **firefuzz** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:37 am

Post subject: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:56 pm

Old Savage wrote:For certain individuals?????

No there shouldn't, but evidently there is. A list of the Untouchables would be nice.

Rob

bdhold · Post by **bdhold** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:39 am

I think it's simple.
If it disappears, or if you get edited, the owner of the board didn't like it.
It just don't skin my teeth.
Nice of him to invite us here.

rjohns94 · Post by **rjohns94** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:42 am

Well Fred, so long as you don't treat them like current girl friends, things should go fine. If your wife puts up with your hugging and collecting all the photos with the other women in your life, a little reunion wont cause any problems. The no tongues suggestion should be high on the list of conduct!!

TedH · Post by **TedH** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:45 am

rjohns94 wrote: The no tongues suggestion should be high on the list of conduct!!

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:05 am

TedH wrote:
rjohns94 wrote: The no tongues suggestion should be high on the list of conduct!!

If the Ladies have expectations, please gift them to me......

Post by **Old Savage** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:24 am

sitting here at LAX doing this on the cell, you guys are the entertainment. Weather, since someone asked, horrible in WB according to Sue Jolley director of alumni relations and apparently the golf tourney tomorrow

rjohns94 · Post by **rjohns94** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:39 pm

rain will be gone by tomorrow here. greens should be soft and holding. putting slow. have a good game.

Griff · Post by **Griff** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 pm

rjohns94 wrote:rain will be gone by tomorrow here. greens should be soft and holding. putting slow. have a good game.

Finally. Advise he can use!

model55 · Post by **model55** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:19 pm

The past is dead live the moment,have fun and remember who you're going home with!

Stump Buster · Post by **Stump Buster** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:12 am

I dunno, but my Marlins seem to be more accurate than my Winchesters!?!?!?

Post by **Old Savage** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:11 am

Well then I find myself helping make wedding dress decorations at 35,000 with two lovely ladies, pics will have to wait until I return, you just never know. Golf tourney may be a rainout but certainly not the reception in the 69 Homecoming Queens suite down the hall tomorrow. Later my frriends!

Tycer · Post by **Tycer** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:01 am

A sweet suite.

kimwcook · Post by **kimwcook** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:02 am

OS, have fun at your reunion.

jeepnik · Post by **jeepnik** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:08 pm

TedH wrote:We all know the 45-70 is the only one worth having. That little 444 is just a wannabe.

Oh heck, I'd express my opinion, but I got kicked off another forum for stating it, and I like it here.

Nath · Post by **Nath** » Sat Oct 02, 2010 5:06 am

The only double standards needed here is that OS needs Bromide stiring in his coffee and I don't

N

Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.

Re: Should there be a double standard in conduct here.