best non-optical sighting solution

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
deadwooddan
Levergunner
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:43 pm

best non-optical sighting solution

Post by deadwooddan »

What does everyone use besides a scope to improve accuracy for paper punching and hunting purposes?

I have always wanted to try the XS SightSystem

http://www.gunblast.com/Ashley_Ghost_Ring.htm

BUT had read a thread on the Williams 5D aperture sight, that served double duty when aperture was removed they used it like a ghost site. then also looked at Marble's Bullseye rear sight for $15 almost sounds cheap?? Have never used a tang mounted sight but don't think i care for the looks of them. Looking for an all purpose double duty fix??

Looking for something that i can work up loads with and do a little precision shooting with my Win. 94 and hunt with.


EDIT on the Marbles sight
Last edited by deadwooddan on Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
greyowl
Levergunner
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Maine woods

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by greyowl »

The Williams sights are good one's in my opinion. I use it both with and witout the apendig, like a ghost ring for hunting on my Marlin 1894. Skinner sights are good ones too. Quite a few variations to pick from.
Shooting is the national passtime/ walk softly and carry a big stick
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Pete44ru »

[ also looked at Marble's tang sight for $15 almost sounds cheap?? ]

$115 would be more like a discount price today for a Marble's tang, since they usually sell for $125 or so.

Any peep sight, receiver or tang, can be used as a "ghost ring" sight when it's aperture is unscrewed/removed - even the XS, which is available with stems threaded for apertures.

I do best with a receiver peep, used in conjunction with a fiber-optic front sight, like the Williams FireSight, or a Hi-Viz or Tru-Glo.

The FO beads are available in different colors for different vision and/or shooting situations, as well as coarse or fine beads, for hunting or target work.

.
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Hobie »

The steel Lymans or Redfields are great. I use mostly the Williams Foolproof but the 5D is a good alternative. Next up is the modern Lyman aluminum version. I shoot tang sights including the old Lyman #2 and Marbles but I don't like them on most rifles. However for some they are THE only game in town.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
PaperPatch
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:59 am
Location: Fly Over Country

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by PaperPatch »

deadwooddan wrote:What does everyone use besides a scope to improve accuracy for paper punching and hunting purposes?
Practice.


Several hundred rounds of it!
adirondakjack
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1925
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Upstate NY
Contact:

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by adirondakjack »

I like a Marbles tang peep myself. They do run a bit over $100, but it's money well spent.
Certified gun nut
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by COSteve »

I've got a Marbles tang mount on my 357 and a Williams receiver mount on my little Henry 22lr. Both do well if you keep your eyes as close to the aperture as you can. That way your depth of field is greater than with a regular rear sight.
Steve
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14885
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by J Miller »

I use either the Williams FP 94/36 or the Lyman 66A on my 94s. If the rifle does not come with a post type front sight, I put one on it. Never could shoot a peep sight well with a bead front.
BTB Pic K.JPG
Williams FP-left, Lyman 66A-right


Joe
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32179
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by AJMD429 »

I put lots of work into these photos of views through various sights, including the Williams and XS, and the Marble's Bullseye -

See if this link helps - http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewt ... 80#p246623

I think it may help you visualize the sight pictures you'll get, including the 'ghost ring' setups.

Accuracy-wise, I'm as good with a Ghost-ringed Williams FP (or 5D) as a 6x scope (the scope just helps see better in dim light). The Marble's "Bullseye" sight equates to about a 4x scope for me, and the Williams with the aperture in place gets me to maybe 8x equivalent in what I can hit. The 'tang' sights I've not used 'ghost-ringed' but with apertures they seem to me about like the Marble's Bullseye one (yes, I know the sighting radius is MUCH better with the tang - it's just me I guess), and since the Bullseye ones are SO fast to use, I do like them. They also obscure very little view vs. ALL the other sights I've used. If they were as easy to adjust as the Williams, they'd be all I'd use.

Front-sight wise, Lyman makes 'Globe' ones that use dovetails or ramps, and they are probably the most accurate of all, but perhaps fragile. A 1/16" (or larger if you prefer) brass bead is fairly easy to put in as a replacement, as well, on dovetail or ramp installations. The fiberoptic (i.e. 'Firesight') ones are also available and slip in easily, being more visible under field conditions (try the green and yellow though - not just the orange - fibers for replacement $18 I think for all 3 colors in 4" strands). If you have a 'built-in' sight that isn't very replaceable, you can carefully dimple the front with a Dremel tool and dab white paint in the hole, or get real adventerous and drill through the middle of it front to back, then open a 'window' on the top for light, and slip a fiber-optic strip in it. 'Bow' fiberoptics I think are thinner, if you prefer.
Last edited by AJMD429 on Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
1886
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2835
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:18 pm

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by 1886 »

AJMD429 wrote:I put lots of work into these photos of views through various sights, including the Williams and XS, and the Marble's Bullseye -

See if this link helps - http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewt ... 80#p246623

I think it may help you visualize the sight pictures you'll get, including the 'ghost ring' setups.

Accuracy-wise, I'm as good with a Ghost-ringed Williams FP (or 5D) as a 6x scope (the scope just helps see better in dim light). The Marble's "Bullseye" sight equates to about a 4x scope for me, and the Williams with the aperture in place gets me to maybe 8x equivalent in what I can hit. The 'tang' sights I've not used 'ghost-ringed' but with apertures they seem to me about like the Marble's Bullseye one (yes, I know the sighting radius is MUCH better with the tang - it's just me I guess), and since the Bullseye ones are SO fast to use, I do like them. They also obscure very little view vs. ALL the other sights I've used. If they were as easy to adjust as the Williams, they'd be all I'd use.

Do not sell yourself short, that was a
lot of work. Thanks for all of the valuable info. 1886.
Chuck 100 yd
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:52 pm
Location: Ridgefield WA. USA

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Chuck 100 yd »

For me and PURE ACCURACY with iron sights....
A globe front sight with an aperture insert (for round bull paper targets) is the most accurate of all.
Coupled with any good receiver or tang peep sight with an aperture that allows you to see the front sight CLEARLY and watch out, you will amaze yourself with little groups at long distances.
I have shot 3/4" 100yd. five shot groups using the factory sight set up on my Browning 1885 BPCR in .40-65 and black powder. :D
Bruce Scott
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Western Australia

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Bruce Scott »

This is a vey accurate setup. The sight is a 1930s vintage BSA with an adjustable aperture - pretty ugly but robust. The rubber hood is removable and there is a globe out front with a flat topped post insert. I use it as is for pinging feathered vermin (its a .22) around the garden.

Image
Image
MrMurphy
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1947
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:32 pm

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by MrMurphy »

I've used the XS ghost rings. For paper targets, it's accurate enough though not as much as some dedicated target sights.

For field use it's quick and handy. Nailed a coyote in the dark with one on my Marlin.

The Williams and fiberoptic setups would be my other pick.
71fan
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 644
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by 71fan »

Any receiver sight with a screw in aperture works for me, with a thin post front sight like the Skinner fronts. I also use a Lyman 17 up front on a few of mine so I have a choice of front sights. I like to used the crosshair with the circle in it for paper punching. The 17s aren't the greatest for low light conditions though and I have not used them in the field.
Chad
RKrodle
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:14 pm
Location: Texas

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by RKrodle »

XS make a threaded aperture for theirs also, you can order them from Brownels and the Williams peeps will screw into it.
Ricky

DWWC
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Bill_Rights »

A detailed question about Marble Arms BullsEye on Rossi M92 20" barrel, .45LC/.454 Casull:

PLEASE FORGIVE ME, this will be a duplicate question answer (for some forum member) - I seem to have misplaced the link to the answer I seek.... :(

I have a new Rossi M92 20" barrel, .45LC/.454 Casull arriving next week or so, and I have decided on the Marble Arms BullsEye for the rear sight. Being a pure functionalist, I will probably replace the front sight with a "fiber" light-gatherind bead/tube of some color or other (or order a few lengths of different color fiber and swap 'em in and out myself).

How high is the centerline of the BullsEye rear sight off the bore line? (I realize there are three BullsEyes, the fixed height, the short adjustable and the long adjustable). But what is the middling height-above-bore when these sights are mounted in the dovetail slot that the Rossi factory rear sight came mounted in? AS A STARTING POINT, I WANT THE LINE BETWEEN THE CENTER OF THE REAR SIGHT AND THE CENTER OF THE FRONT BEAD TO BE PARALLEL TO THE BORE, right? Please correct me if this seemingly obvious criteria is wrong...(!) In case it matters, I will probably sight in at 50 yards with up-loaded .45LC or down-loaded .454 Casull.

If I knew that rear sight height, I could select the front sight of the correct height. I thought I looked at the Marble Arms web site and couldn't find the BullsEye heights...(?) Or was I looking on Brownell's (?).

Thanks for your help. This will be my first levergun, and you folks on this forum have been great, so far. (Yes, I am in contact with Nate Kiowah Jones and will order video and several parts [e.g., metal mag follower] to improve the NIB rifle itself.)
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Bill_Rights »

OK, I have started my own research.

1) Marble Arms gives help with calcul;ating height of both front and rear sights (at least for the #30 Universal Rear Sight) here:
http://www.marblearms.com/universalRearSights_info.html
General idea should be applicable to BullsEye or other type sights.... (By the way, I like the "Large Peep Style" of #30 Universal Rear Sight, as a next best to the BullsEye in terms of speed of sight-picture acquisition and MILES AHEAD in terms of adjustability, durability and stability)

2) I see that a number of front sight options come with "ramps" that would allow me to adjust the height of the front sight. That'd be cool! Still have to figure whether such a ramp could install in the Rossi's front dove-tail slot.....?
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Bill_Rights »

Whoops. Apparently none of the Marble Arms front sight ramps are intended for height adjustment, least that I've seen so far.... (RE #2 in post above)
madman4570
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6747
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:30 am
Location: Lower Central NYS

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by madman4570 »

Use CIR-CUT ARCHERY GLOW IN THE DARK LUMINOUS PAINT over my Raybar Rifle sights on Ithaca 37
Use Mepro Sights on my Hoyt Super Slam Extreme Bow.

While these don't do much more for accuracy,for hunting they work very well.

Good Luck!
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20860
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Griff »

PaperPatch wrote:
deadwooddan wrote:What does everyone use besides a scope to improve accuracy for paper punching and hunting purposes?
Practice.
Several hundred rounds of it!
This is THE answer. I know, 'cause I don't and my shooting shows it!

There are sights that I think are better than either Marbles or the Lyman. Tho' of the two, the Marbles, with it's windage adjustment is the better for it's adjustability, but I like the Lyman for it's sturdiness.

The one I liked best is no longer available, as it combined the best of both the Marbles & Lyman. If you're thinking of spending over $100 for either the Lyman and Marbles you'd be well advised to shop around... they're easily found for under $100.

In conjunction with these from: Jeff's Outfitters make for an inexpensive combination with lots of options.

Image Image
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
Old Time Hunter
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:18 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by Old Time Hunter »

Got just about all of them and I keep going back to the XS Ghost Ring set up....but I am getting old.

Hey Griff, you think that that Marbles Globe sight would work on a Springfield Trapdoor with a standard 1879 rear sight?
kid_couteau
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:11 am

Re: best non-optical sighting solution

Post by kid_couteau »

I have a Marlin 1895 in 45-70 that has a Lyman #2 on the tang and a Lyman globe up front.

I LOVE it

Why they do not drill and tap all of the new guns for tang sights I do not know
Kid
Live with honor, ride with truth. Be friendly to others. But always carry a gun on your side and a knife in your boot because there are those that do not feel the same as this.

My knife and leather website

www.kidcouteau.com
Post Reply