.30-30 Flexibility

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
kmittleman
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Contact:

.30-30 Flexibility

Post by kmittleman »

Hi everyone,


I've been doing some pondering on how flexible the pistol caliber levers and the Big Bore levers seem to be. Where does the .30-30 stand in all of this? I know it can kill deer ( my first two were w/ a Marlin 336A last fall ), but what's the range of game it can reasonably take?

-Kevin
Don McDowell

Post by Don McDowell »

History shows us the model 1894 winchester, and the 30wcf cartridge, is/was a big factor in the obsolecence of the 86 and 92 winchesters and their cartridges.
There's little if anything on this continent that hasn't been turned into food for the hungry, and hides/horns on the wall by the good ol 30-30.
That may be the reason lots of us old guys have at least one, and some have more (3 live at my place) :D
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3843
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Post by Malamute »

Here's a good thread,

viewtopic.php?t=6167&sid=bec96fcf944d7b ... c473225fe1


May answer some of your questions. The range of game is wide, the hunter and his shooting and stalking abilities may be more the question.


Getitdone1 has some tales of Ralph Edwards from BC Canada that used a Winchester 94 carbine in 30-30 cal for many years and killed over 50 grizzlies with it before he stopped counting. May not be the first choice in calibers for grizzlies, but with a cool hand, it can get the job done.


I believe Don that just posted above, has killed, and seen killed, a fair pile of elk with 30-30's.
bogus bill
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: utah

Post by bogus bill »

Do you mean 30/30 in relationship to 357 or 30 -06 or whatever? The 30/30 is still capable of killing anything in the country.
I would trust a 375 h&h to be better on moose at 300 yards then a 30/30 etc. I dont quite know how to give a short answer as I am not real sure of what you want to know. However, lets assume there to be something like a 150 different caliber cartridges out there. I think hunting wise we could get by with three.
I would expect a 30/30 to have a flatter trajectry at 200 yards then a 357 etc, however at 50 yards I dont think a deer would know the difference.
I read of people useing .44 hennrey rimfire to kill buffalo 150 years ago but it wouldnt have been my first choice.
I imagine this will be better answered with others in better words then I can do shortly.
User avatar
kmittleman
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Contact:

Post by kmittleman »

I guess I was wondering what's a reasonable range in terms of game size. I'm not a super experienced hunter so would probably err on the conservative side. It sounds like it would good for javelina to black bear. What do you all think?

-kevin
scr83jp
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: S. Calif

Post by scr83jp »

kmittleman wrote:I guess I was wondering what's a reasonable range in terms of game size. I'm not a super experienced hunter so would probably err on the conservative side. It sounds like it would good for javelina to black bear. What do you all think?

-kevin
Colorado 75 yard 2 shot kill of a a 5x4 Bull Elk using a Winchester 30-30 we spoke to the successful hunter but it took him and his middle 70's hunting partner 2 days to get it out of the mtn side where he downed it as there were no roads or trails & they had to cut it up and pack it out.
User avatar
JimT
Shootist
Posts: 6745
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm

Post by JimT »

Two Points (in no particular order)

1. Learn to put the bullet in exact spot it needs to be. That will in some respects dictate the distance you shoot.

2. Learn to Hunt. That means getting close and then a bit closer.

Every "failure" I have had has been the result of me screwing up one or both of those. It has never been the the fault of the firearm or the bullet.

I once killed a fairly large Mule Deer with my single six using .22 Long Rifle Hi-Speed Hollow Points - I got up within 15 feet, then eased a bit closer and shot it in the back of the head when it stood up.

"Bullet Failure" is when someone tries to use a bullet for a job that it was not intended for, such as shooting a deer in the shoulder with a small caliber high velocity varmint bullet.

I have shot at too long a range and failed to put the bullet in the exact spot that it needed to be.

None of my failures were due to caliber or bullet. They were my fault.
Nath
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8751
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: England

Post by Nath »

Pretty much JT covered it, I use to want to be able to hit stuff at silly distances but now like to get close and thus my 30 is enough from rabbits to large deer. I don't know but double tapping a moose up close, I just can not see a problem. Just my opinion.
Nath.
Psalm ch8.

Because I wish I could!
User avatar
El Chivo
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3682
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: Red River Gorge Area

Post by El Chivo »

I think of it as the load more than the caliber. Different weight bullets, charges, etc.

Having said that, the 30-30 is a good choice. It seems like it's just big enough for big game and ok for small game, and because of the smallish caliber it retains energy well.
"I'll tell you what living is. You get up when you feel like it. You fry yourself some eggs. You see what kind of a day it is."
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14906
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Post by J Miller »

kmittleman,

I'm not much of a hunter. But I will say this, I'll take my Win 94 to hunt anything on this continent, without hesitation.

Read and reread JimT's post, he hit the nail right on the head.

Oh, and don't forget: "***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts :wink: .*** "
I read that somewhere........


Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
Hillbilly
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Post by Hillbilly »

I keep a .30-06 around if I ever want to hunt "out west"... and I dont know that I would hang around big bear country with a .30 WCF on purpose....
That being said.... If I was on a trout stream and that old '94 was all I had I'd be happy enough.

Marksmanship is more than big hot bullets and optics

My .02

Jeff
Jaguarundi
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:27 am
Location: Wiregrass Area,Alabama

Post by Jaguarundi »

Don McDowell wrote:History shows us the model 1894 winchester, and the 30wcf cartridge, is/was a big factor in the obsolecence of the 86 and 92 winchesters and their cartridges.
There's little if anything on this continent that hasn't been turned into food for the hungry, and hides/horns on the wall by the good ol 30-30.
That may be the reason lots of us old guys have at least one, and some have more (3 live at my place) :D
Amen and JimT your spot on also 8) !
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
tman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3243
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 pm

Post by tman »

the 30wcf. has probablly killed more brown bear than any other cartridge. place the bullet in the vitals at ranges that charging, dangerous game is shot and it will do the job. we'd all feel more comfortable with something bigger, but the 30wcf. been doing it for over 100years, that's good enough for me.
Post Reply