Anyone have a "newer" Browning BLR w/ the aluminum

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
Triggernosis
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:34 pm

Anyone have a "newer" Browning BLR w/ the aluminum

Post by Triggernosis »

If you do, what's your opinion on the aluminum vs. the steel version?
I don't mind at all an aluminum receiver as far as strength/utility, etc. - I'm more worried about how well the finish will hold up over time. I mean, a well-worn blued steel finish doesn't bother me as it shows character, but a scratched aluminum finish looks cheesy to me.

What are y'all's thoughts?
Tom
Eastern N.C.

NRA Rifle Instructor
4-H Rifle Instructor
HP Service Rifle competitor
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7778
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Post by Tycer »

The receiver takes zero stress. The bolt locks into the barrel, not the receiver.

Magazines are getting scarce for the steel ones.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Post by Pete44ru »

JMO, but a steel receiver can easily be refurbished/refinished, while dings in aluminum/alloy tend to be forever, and cheesy.
RKrodle
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:14 pm
Location: Texas

Post by RKrodle »

I have one of the aluminum receivers and have not managed to scratch or ding it yet. As far as refinishing it I would think just about any plating shop could do it.
Ricky

DWWC
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Post by Pete44ru »

Alloy/aluminum is anodized ILO plated, IIRC - but dings will still show, plated or anodized - as neither process fills in surface defects.
I, for one, wouldn't want one milled or filed down to smooth out dings.

Steel's not usually gonna get gouged as deeply, being harder.
User avatar
CowboyTutt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3812
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Mission Viejo, CA

Post by CowboyTutt »

Trigger, some of our members prefer the steel receivers and say they feel different in the hand. I have an aluminum one, and have not held and cycled a steel one, so I cannot say. I think the steel receiver crowd sort of prefer them for traditions sake myself, but they are men of class and have a right to their opinion. However, Tycer is correct regarding strength. I believe Browning has improved the forearm mounting on the new Brownings compared to the older steel ones. If I understand Mic McPherson's emails, the old design used a hanger for the forearm that could create a "tuning fork" and unwanted barrel vibrations. This design flaw has been corrected it seems. Anyone that has a newer BLR with the aluminum reciever will tell you they are extremely accurate, including our own Doc Hudson (where you been, Doc?). I can vouch for the accuracy of mine too. I do find the action of the BLR's to be a bit "clunky" and a Win 1895 is smoother if your looking for a levergun that can shoot pointed bullets, but the BLR's are very accurate. Hope this helps.

-Tutt
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16949
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Old Savage »

I have a .243 Steel and it is very accurate - I have shot 1/4" at 100 yds. I handled Cowboy's and it is balanced better and is less prettied up and better suited for the field without concern. I would rather carry his than mine.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
Lastmohecken
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Arkansas

Post by Lastmohecken »

I prefer the steel ones, due to handling preferences, but only in the short action. I have had 4 different steel BLRs, and still own 3 of them, and my brother in law has 2 steel BLR's, and I have several friends who also have at least one. We have not had one yet that didn't shoot good groups.

I recently purchased a 22/250 in a steel framed BLR, which should make a great walking coyote gun.
scr83jp
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: S. Calif

Post by scr83jp »

I'll never buy or own any weapon with an aluminum frame or receiver because I had a Mossberg 9200 Semi auto shotgun that had a 3" chamber grenade while firing my 2 3/4"Win AA reloads.These were the same shells I fired weekly in my all steel Rem 870 trap & my custom built Win Mod 12 trap w/o any problems. I was not injured but I could squeeze the ruptured aluminum receiver together with my thumb & forefinger.Every time the bolt cycled turnings of aluminum would appear.Mossberg replaced it & when I checked the new one it had aluminum turnings in the action & made new ones every time I cycled the bolt,I took the new one to the store where I bought the first one & turned it in on an all steel Rem 11-87.That was my first and last mossberg!
User avatar
CowboyTutt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3812
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Mission Viejo, CA

Post by CowboyTutt »

SCR, while I understand your frustration, Browning makes a far better gun than Mossberg, and it is probably not even a fair comparison. Aluminum alloys can be very strong with the right mixtures of metals.

-Tutt
Pisgah
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1899
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: SC

Post by Pisgah »

scr83jp wrote:I'll never buy or own any weapon with an aluminum frame or receiver because I had a Mossberg 9200 Semi auto shotgun that had a 3" chamber grenade while firing my 2 3/4"Win AA reloads.These were the same shells I fired weekly in my all steel Rem 870 trap & my custom built Win Mod 12 trap w/o any problems. I was not injured but I could squeeze the ruptured aluminum receiver together with my thumb & forefinger.Every time the bolt cycled turnings of aluminum would appear.Mossberg replaced it & when I checked the new one it had aluminum turnings in the action & made new ones every time I cycled the bolt,I took the new one to the store where I bought the first one & turned it in on an all steel Rem 11-87.That was my first and last mossberg!
With the Mossberg, as with the BLR, the lockup is 100% steel-to-steel. In other words, no matter what happened the receiver had nothing to do with it. It takes none of the pressure.
Triggernosis
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:34 pm

Post by Triggernosis »

Thanks for the responses, gentlemen.

Please note that in my initial post that I said that I had no concern over aluminum's strength....no issue at all.
I am purely interested in how well the aluminum receiver handles wear and tear, finish-wise.
Tom
Eastern N.C.

NRA Rifle Instructor
4-H Rifle Instructor
HP Service Rifle competitor
blackhawk44
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: San Antonio, Republic of Texas

Post by blackhawk44 »

While I own three steel framed BLR's I have also handled and fired two aluminum frames. The balance is a bit different with the aluminum being a bit more muzzle heavy. The most apparent difference seems to be in cycle of the bolt and lever. The fluted bolt of the lightweights is not as smooth and seems to release with a somewhat sudden, jerky movement. Admittedly, I have not handled one that had been cycled enough to see if they smooth out with use or maybe a little jewelers rouge.

The magazines that are scarce are the scalloped actioned, potbellied pre-81 magazines. The magazines for all BLR 81's are the same, whether for steel or aluminum framed guns.
Post Reply