RELIGION - Salvation from a different angle

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
User avatar
AmBraCol
Webservant
Posts: 3855
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:12 am
Location: The Center of God's Grace
Contact:

Post by AmBraCol »

AJMD429 wrote:Good point. All of us as humans may (if we work at it) come to understand a 'slice of the pie' of Truth.
The Bible states that many will be lost "because they did not love the truth". Anyone who claims to exclusive possession of truth is suspect, in my mind. But so are those who claim that truth does not exist. To love truth and to seek to know truth and to live by truth is a worthy endeavor. As Jesus said "If you abide in my words you will know the truth and the truth will set you free." Religions that bind people up have not learned a thing from Jesus the Christ. He came to set us free, not to imprison us. And when we live according to His teachings - from the heart - then we are indeed free.

Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul and all your strength - and love your neighbor as yoursef. Those two commandments pretty much sum it up, and provide us for a lot of leeway in our lives while still giving us direction.
Paul - in Pereira


"He is the best friend of American liberty who is most sincere and active in promoting true and undefiled religion." -- John Witherspoon

http://www.paulmoreland.com
http://www.pistolpackingpreachers.us
http://www.precisionandina.com
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16949
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Old Savage »

Years ago I thought the Bible was likely a Hebrew Canterbury Tales but I read an article (not the one presented here) about this man and became convinced in about 5 minutes that the Holy Spirit is the author. I have a matematical mind.


http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/panin2.htm
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Post by AJMD429 »

AmBraCol wrote: The Bible states that many will be lost "because they did not love the truth". Anyone who claims to exclusive possession of truth is suspect, in my mind. But so are those who claim that truth does not exist. To love truth and to seek to know truth and to live by truth is a worthy endeavor. As Jesus said "If you abide in my words you will know the truth and the truth will set you free." Religions that bind people up have not learned a thing from Jesus the Christ. He came to set us free, not to imprison us. And when we live according to His teachings - from the heart - then we are indeed free.

Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul and all your strength - and love your neighbor as yoursef. Those two commandments pretty much sum it up, and provide us for a lot of leeway in our lives while still giving us direction.
Very well said. If we'd all but heed this divine advice, think how splendid our earthly world could be - we'd truly have 'Heaven on Earth'.

At least many of us are striving with some successes to live our lives 'in service,' including just about all the 'Levergunners' I see posting, whether or not they would label themselves as 'religious' - look at all the good things most are doing 'in service' of God or society in one way or another.

A pretty good bunch of fella's even if they get all riled up and argue now and again. :?

Just so nobody gripes about all these 'OT' posts, here's a tie-in - this is the place I do most of my praying, and it's ALSO where I . . .

Image . . . shoot my LEVERGUNS. . . !
Image. . . 8)
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16949
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Old Savage »

Church of the Western Skies.

Image
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
shooter
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: Heartland, TX

Post by shooter »

BAGTIC wrote:
gon2shoot wrote:OK, yall correct me if I'm wrong. went back and read the BOLD print start of the article.
Pretty much says "I'll believe Jesus but not Paul"?

Here's my thoughts, IT"S THE SAME BOOK< IF PART OF IT IS WRONG, IT'S ALL WRONG.
I'm smellin a $3.00 bill.
IT IS NOT THE SAME BOOK.

THE BIBLE IS NOT 'A BOOK'. It is an anthology of many writings by many authors witten over a span of at least 1600 years. Would one say that if some articles in an encyclopedia are erroneous the entire encyclopedia is thereby false.

quote]

So you're saying that the Bible is not 100% inspired by God. How are we to discern, then, what is and what isn't inspired by God? How do we even know that Jesus said what the Bible says that He said if it isn't inspired? It could just be some guys that thought this would be a good way to live and wrote it down like it came from God. See where the picking and choosing of the Bible gets you into trouble? The Bible is a book. It was inspired and preserved by God as one of His means of communication to us. If our works are what get us into Heaven, then Jesus' sacrifice is meaningless. If I can get myself into Heaven by what I do, then Jesus died for nothing. God doesn't do things that are meaningless. There was a reason for Jesus to come and die. It wasn't so we could work our way into Heaven. The Old Testament saints weren't even admitted into Heaven based on works. The Bible says that Abraham believed, and his righteousness was counted. Not, "Abraham did great works and his righteousness was counted".
‎"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen" - Samuel Adams
brucew44guns
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1403
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: kansas

Re: heaven

Post by brucew44guns »

BAGTIC wrote:
brucew44guns wrote:I went to that website to see what it was. Typical of many I've seen all my life, where the insistance that Saved Christians are going up to a Heavenly Reward after they die is taught. But Jesus did say that "No Man has ever ascended up to Heaven, except the Son of Man who came down from heaven" . Acts chapter 2 bears out, that David, a man after Gods own heart, "has not ascended into the heavens",. You'd think David made it if anyone could. I wish someday, that someone could clearly, without any gaps, and directly from the scriptures, show me where heaven is the reward of the saved. Isn't Jesus the young nobleman who went into a far country, (heaven), to recieve a kingdom, and to return? I always read where the Savior would return to this earth, pretty plain stuff about that, but I guess he will be all alone here, everyone will be in heaven.
"ascended", past tense (not yet... at that time) , not shall never 'ascend'.





If Heaven were indeed the reward of saved Christians, like the entire world of churchianity teaches, it would not be surprising to see the entire New testament at least, just filled with references of "when we all get to heaven", "I can't wait to die, so I can go to heaven", "I'll see you in heaven soon", "I hope I don't screw up so I can be in heaven" " I wonder what old so-and-so is doing in heaven today" , would we not see a prevailing theme of everyone going to heaven? It's the chief theme of the churches---"going to heaven", but no direct statement is available about going there in the scriptures. Jesus would have taught many pages all about the joys, the reward of going to heaven. It's simply not there, because heaven is not the reward of the saved, according to the scriptures. Everyone is supposed to be going to heaven according to churches and mens teachings, but not according to the scriptures. A few misunderstood and vague scriptures have fostered this whole concept. The scriptures teach Christ returning to this earth to establish a Kingdom, at the end of this age, and I understand that we will meet him in the air at his return, but that is after we are resurrected and rise to meet him. But it says his feet are going to set down on the Mount of olives at His return, a little different place than heaven. The Patriarch David is one man whom God himself declared was a "Man after his own heart", (Gods Heart). If anyone can go to heaven, it is David, a righteous man indeed. Yet, in Acts Chapter 2:Vs 34, it says "For David is not ascended into heaven". Vs 29 says that "David is both dead and buried" and they knew where his grave was. This was well after Christs assencion. No, David was just as it says in Eccl. 9:5--"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything". They are dead, unconscious, waiting in their graves for Christs return, and a resurrection from the dead. No need of a resurrection if you are allready alive in heaven, yet the bible speaks of graves by the millions opening up and dead people coming back to life, including the saints who knew Christ and had His Holy Spirit before they died. A wrong premise can get anyone way off the path of truth, but heaven as a reward immediately after death is a misnomer in the extreme. Millions of people know, and have known this truth over the ages, it just isn't taught in churches much. The Minister would get fired most likely, it's not what people want to hear.
To hell with them fellas, buzzards gotta eat same as the worms.
Outlaw Josey Wales

Member GOA
NRA Benefactor-Life
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Post by BAGTIC »

AmBraCol wrote:
BAGTIC wrote:Jesus did not think so. Jesus personally contravened many of the teachings in the Old Testament and encouraged his followers to do likewise. Jesus have done that if he believed that EVERYTHING in the Old Testament was commanded by God? Jesus rcognized that some of the teachings in the O.T. were "the traditions of men", not the word of God. Of course some of the humans who wrote those traditions would have CLAIMED they were the word of God in order to add auithority to the commandments of mere men.

In that, sir, you're incorrect. Jesus came to fulfill the Old Testament, not to contradict it or contravene it. What He DID do was go against what the "religious authorities" of His day TAUGHT IT SAID - much to their ire, anger and disgust. The purpose of the Old Testament was to prepare a people for the coming of the promised One - Jesus the Christ. And that it did well. Jesus even went so far as to say "Nothing will pass from the Old Testament Law until it has all been finished". Then on the cross He said "It is finished." The New Testament is just that, a new pact between God and those who wish to follow Him. Starting in Acts and reading through Revelation you can come to see that the New Testament is both broader and stricter than the Old Testament. The law of love taught in the New Testament is much stricter because it affects us at a deeper level than the old "thou shalts" and "thou shalt nots" ever could. We are now responsible not only for WHAT we do, but for WHY we do it, something that is not easily judged except by God Himself and the individual who is brutally honest with himself.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jesus did not say he came to fulfill the Old Testament. He could not have as the 'Old Testmant' did not exist then there not yet being a 'New Testament'.

Jesus said he came to "fulfill the law [of God]. The fact that he directly contradicted parts of the Old Testament shows that he did not consider ALL of the Old Testament to be the 'Law of God'. That is where reliance on the Holy Spirit comes in to help us sort the wheat from the chaff. Unfortunately there are some who would rather dedicate their attention to trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear.

For those who keep claiming that nowhere in the Bible does it say that man will be judged by his deeds I offer

Ezekiel 24:14

"I, the LORD, have spoken; it is coming and I will act I will not relent, and I will not pity and I will not be sorry; according to your ways and according to your deeds I will judge you," declares the Lord GOD.'"
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Post by BAGTIC »

Ezekiel 18:20

20"The person who sins will die The son will not bear the punishment for the father's iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son's iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

So from where comes the concept of 'original sin' inherited from Adam and Eve?
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Post by BAGTIC »

shooter wrote: The Great Comission, "Go therefore and make desciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all I have commanded you, and lo, I am with you, even to the end of the age.", is not necessarily a commandment to go to different nations.

If one makes disciples on ALL nations one must of necessity go to different nations as all is totally inclusive.


"Here Paul reiterates again the importance of there only being ONE Gospel, and that the Gospel he preaches comes straight from Jesus.


Here Paul is iterating his bias by insisting that HIS (Paul's) Gospel ought have priority above the teachings of all the other disciples and apaostles. No one ever accused Paul of being a modest man.
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Post by BAGTIC »

Grizz wrote:Here's the simple version about works. The Bible explicitly states that no man is saved by his works so he cannot boast of his salvation.
The Bible also explicitly says, even by Jesus himself, that men are saved by their works and deeds.
sonof40
Levergunner
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by sonof40 »

BAGTIC wrote:
Here Paul is iterating his bias by insisting that HIS (Paul's) Gospel ought have priority above the teachings of all the other disciples and apaostles. No one ever accused Paul of being a modest man.

What people don't understand is that the 7 nations to whom Paul was sent had never been under God's Law...while all the other nations of this world HAD been under God's Law.

That's why Jesus commanded the 12 to not take what He had taught them to the 7 nations of Gentiles...and that's why Jesus sent Paul to those 7 nations, with a different message which was applicable to them.

Therefore Paul was RIGHT when to told the Gentiles to NOT listen to the gospel which Jesus had given the 12 Apostles!

Paul understood that his message was sent ONLY to those 7 nations to which he was sent...and NOT for all the other nations! And Paul understood that the message given to the 12 Apostes was NOT sent to the 7 nations to whom he was sent!

The problem is that the world does not YET understand the above!
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Post by BAGTIC »

[quote="sonof40"] The problem is that the world does not YET understand the above!quote]

The problem is that today there are no more gentiles. Today ALL people are under the SAME covenant, that delivered by Jesus. What Paul said and did then are irrelevant to modern man. What Jesus said remains the path to salvation.
sonof40
Levergunner
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by sonof40 »

I agree, there are no more Gentiles...for the teachings of Paul applied to the parents, but not the children...because, the parents hadn't previously been in God's family...but their children WOULD be born, already in God's family!

The seven nations to whom Paul was sent, were the children of Japheth...and Noah's blessing to Japheth was that he would someday dwell in the tents of Shem...

And when you dwell in your brother's house, you must live by the rules of his house...and the children of Shem were commanded to hear Jesus...therefore the 'children' of the Gentiles are to live by the teachings of Jesus also!

What Paul said applied ONLY to those 7 nations he was sent to!

Also, what Paul said didn't guarantee those 7 nations that they would go to Heaven...because Jesus speaks, in Revelation, to the same 7 churches He sent Paul to...as He had said, His 'other' sheep also must hear His voice...and from what Jesus told them, they will NOT go to Heaven...unless they obey Jesus!

People can believe whatsoever they choose...but in reality, there is only ONE fold...and only One Shepherd...and Paul is NOT the Shepherd!
Post Reply