Dirty Dan wrote:Sorry AmBraCol- I waited 13 long weeks on the boys in AK for my belt & holster, based mostly on good reviews here.
The belt is simply a wide, thick piece of leather with a stain that comes off on my Wranglers if I sweat much. It does not even have a keeper to hold the tail in place.
The holster is too tight for a one handed insertion of the pistol, yet while standing in the bed of my truck, bent over at the waist to lift a hog, the pistol slid out not once, but twice. The second time I laid it on the seat of the truck.
My first and last purchase from simplyrugged.
Sorry Dan - I've waited sometimes too (on the ONE "boy" in AK) and got the belt. Have several holsters for guns from the New Vaquero to a couple of S&W N frames to S&W J frames to Colt Detective Special. I've done quite a bit of work, lift and tote, and hunting with these holsters. I've had a couple of incidents wearing them which caused me some pain but the gun was where it ought to be. One involved going head over heels, literally.
I can't see what the difference is but I've had no problems with mine. I also own several Bianchi, Galco, and other makes and they also work well. The belt had no loop for the tail but it works for supporting a gun and the tail will go in the belt loop on my pants so that I can control it. I do know that if there is something you don't like, Rob will make it right. If you haven't asked that's your own fault.
Personally, I always prefered the thumbsnap strap on the holsters and have the same on my Bianchi #3 for my S&W M13 and on a Bianchi 7L for my 1911. Of course those guns stayed in place despite sometimes doing rather rugged demonstrations wearing them. Then again, I also have a Galco IWB sans strap and the Commander never found a way out that didn't involve my hand properly on the gun. Then again I don't ride horses or bulls. So, I guess I've got mixed feelings on the subject of retaining straps.
I'll tell you that I don't like the horizontal shoulder holsters either. They and the inverted holsters don't feel right to me. However, all holsters have the barrel of the gun pointing somewhere, as do cases, boxes, etc. It is always possible that somebody will cross a part of their body in front of the muzzle. While I don't deliberately (or is that "deliberately don't") point the muzzle at anything I don't intend to destroy, the muzzle is always pointed somewhere which mandates control of that trigger! Too, I might be more inured to the idea as we see lots of muzzles in the military no matter what the training has been just because of the density of users.