![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Image](http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii110/ozzallos/IRL%20Pics/sksclean2_zps70353ae9.jpg)
![Image](http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii110/ozzallos/IRL%20Pics/sksclean1_zps45fc639a.jpg)
![Image](http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii110/ozzallos/IRL%20Pics/bayo_zps03158603.jpg)
Grizz wrote:looks cool, looks belligerent too.
does that mag hold the 10 rounds in the clip? is there such a thing as a high capacity magazine for the SKS? or a bottom feed?
Grizz
Yeps. 10 round internal mag.Grizz wrote:looks cool, looks belligerent too.
does that mag hold the 10 rounds in the clip? is there such a thing as a high capacity magazine for the SKS? or a bottom feed?
Grizz
That sight exists and gets generally good reviews. http://www.tech-sights.com/sks.htmAJMD429 wrote:I prefer the more compact top-feed, non-removable, magazine for the SKS; if I want a higher-capacity detachable magazine version of a similar gun, I'll grab a Saiga or 'AK' instead. To me, the appeal of the SKS is the durable simplicity, and compactness. Kind of a semiauto version of a 30-30.
I do wish that I had a good rear sight that mounted on the action-cover (that far back would have to ben an 'aperture' type), as it would dramatically increase sight radius, and improve whatever potential accuracy I could get from the gun.
Beat me to it.Tank50 wrote:That sight exists and gets generally good reviews. http://www.tech-sights.com/sks.htm
AJMD429 wrote:I prefer the more compact top-feed, non-removable, magazine for the SKS; if I want a higher-capacity detachable magazine version of a similar gun, I'll grab a Saiga or 'AK' instead. To me, the appeal of the SKS is the durable simplicity, and compactness. Kind of a semiauto version of a 30-30.
I do wish that I had a good rear sight that mounted on the action-cover (that far back would have to ben an 'aperture' type), as it would dramatically increase sight radius, and improve whatever potential accuracy I could get from the gun.
A perfect description of the SKS. I mounted a Williams WGRS sight on one of mine, works great. I think I used the one for one of the muzzle-loading rifles, I guesstimated what the diameter of the dust cover would be if it was a complete circle and one of the Brownell's tech support peps helped me get the right one. A little epoxy under the sight for a filler and wah-la, works like a champ. My accuracy improvement with the gun was actually pretty dramatic after I did this.AJMD429 wrote: To me, the appeal of the SKS is the durable simplicity, and compactness. Kind of a semiauto version of a 30-30.
I do wish that I had a good rear sight that mounted on the action-cover (that far back would have to ben an 'aperture' type), as it would dramatically increase sight radius, and improve whatever potential accuracy I could get from the gun.
Manged to get the 464 out there too. Since the SKS was iron sights only, I slapped a scope on the Mossy and let my friend sight her in. 30-30 smacks the hell out of those iron caltrop targets and nothing inside 200y was safeLEVERGUN CONTENT ALERT
Your table?Mescalero wrote:I just threw mine away.
What??Mescalero wrote:I just threw mine away.