Rossi 92 safety removal.

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
1886
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2835
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:18 pm

Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by 1886 »

I have a shot at a Rossi 92 trapper .357/.38. Rifle is super clean and the price is right. I plan on removing that safety widget on top of the bolt and replacing it with Steve's unit. That still leaves the little red F and green S. How to deal with that? Please advise. Thanks and God Bless, 1886.
User avatar
Buck Elliott
Member Emeritus
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Buck Elliott »

black paint
Regards

Buck

Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
Morgan
Levergunner
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Morgan »

The F am S are stamped in the bolt. Dip a tooth pick in some Mineral spirits and scratch the
red and green colors off. That easy!
Honesty, courage and integrity are the foundation of Life-Do it, Risk it!
1886
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2835
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:18 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by 1886 »

Sounds good. Thanks.
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Bill_Rights »

Another noob question: What's wrong with the stamped "F" and "S"? :?: What do they stand for, anyway?
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3873
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by COSteve »

Bill_Rights wrote:Another noob question: What's wrong with the stamped "F" and "S"? :?: What do they stand for, anyway?
Dugh!!! How about 'fire' and 'safe'?
Steve
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
User avatar
Sarge
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 877
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:54 am
Location: MO

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Sarge »

Bill_Rights wrote:Another noob question: What's wrong with the stamped "F" and "S"? :?: What do they stand for, anyway?
That's for "Fling" or "Sling" as it applies to your options in launching the freshly-removed idiot switch into the nearest brushpile, dungheap or landfill; depending of course on your surroundings.
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
2571
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1168
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: detroit

ask when not sure; disregard the smart-a** response above

Post by 2571 »

Bill_Rights wrote:Another noob question: What's wrong with the stamped "F" and "S"? :?: What do they stand for, anyway?
Not a "noob" question on a furrin -made rifle. Letters are counter-intuitive in the English language. I've seen 'C' on both faucet handles on the same sink in Canada, "chaude" (hot) & cold, and the water lines were reversed to dispense scalding water from the right.
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Bill_Rights »

Thanks for the defense, 2571. But Fire/Safe should have at least occurred to me...

The other part of my question was, what is so objectionable about the factory engraving? (Other than that it's meaningless once you take that safety off). A lot of people (not me, however) prize factory-original condition when they go to buy a used gun. So, if you save the old safety pieces and leave the engraving intact, you've got that covered. Yes, I know, most people on this forum prize similarity to the old Western lever rifles even more than they think other people prize factory-originalness. That's perfectly fine. It boils down to values and money as a measure of them. You pays yo' money and you makes yo' choice....
Last edited by Bill_Rights on Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 27881
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Ysabel Kid »

Bill_Rights -

That was a good question - don't worry about it. The problem most have here is that the original 1892 Winchesters did not have a "lawyer special" safety, so a lot of us hate the ugly thing!
Image
Bill_Rights
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Bill_Rights »

Ysabel,

Uhhuh, I got that people on this forum don't like the lawyer-special safety both because it often gets bumped to the"safe" position unknowingly and because it wasn't on the older 1892s.

But sooner or later, maybe already, the Rossi (copy that it is) will become its own "legend" and be prized by collectors more if it has all its factory-original parts intact. There is a sense among some, inexplicable to me, that factory-original has some value, even if it is not the best. At least everybody knows what it is. I am NOT saying I agree with those collectors (I am not a collector) and I AM saying that I agree with everyday users of rifles that want to mod it to be the best it can be. I do not necessarily agree with those who would mod a rifle to make it more like a 1890s, 1900s, 1920s, pre-1964 or any other old style levergun, UNLESS it also made the rifle demonstrably better in its function. But that's just me.
piller
Posting leader...
Posts: 15227
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: South of Dallas

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by piller »

I found the safety on my Puma switched itself to "Safe" and I had a problem with it at the range. I finally used some Loctite to make it stay in one place while leaving it where it will still work----if you want to get a brass punch and a small hammer. A safety which switches itself for no known reason worries me. What would happen if I happened to be using that rifle on something dangerous, say a Water Buffalo, and the safety came on when I was trying to shoot? Safeties are mechanical and made by humans, therefore thay can and will fail. I would rather have the half-cock position on the hammer and use a little caution.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32173
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by AJMD429 »

piller wrote:I found the safety on my Puma switched itself to "Safe" and I had a problem with it at the range. I finally used some Loctite to make it stay in one place while leaving it where it will still work----if you want to get a brass punch and a small hammer. A safety which switches itself for no known reason worries me.
I really liked the ones on all my Rossi rifles, but one day I was putting away a bottle of LocTite on the top shelf, and must have spilled a couple drops on each gun. . . darn the luck. . . :wink:
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
exdetsgt
Levergunner
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by exdetsgt »

Maybe I better do something about mine. The day I bought the rifle I switched it from safe to fire. When I did so, I noticed that it was difficult, took pressure, and there was a noticeable "click" when it finally moved to fire. I haven't touched it since, and it shows no signs of moving. It seems to me that if you were to remove it, and insert the plug that someone makes, and if you were to save the original, you could always switch them back in case you wanted to sell the carbine to a collector type.
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

I had a feller contact me recenly to order one of my plugs. He had ordered my DVD and other parts before but was going to stay with the safety. The reason he decided to go ahead and plug it was the safety got stuck in the safe postion and he missed a shot on a pig. When he took it apart he found some crud in with the detent ball and spring. He said the only thing he could remember that would have crudded it up was moving through some thick under growth with vines. He said he remembered pushing the vines out of the way so it appeared one of the vines got drug across the safety peeling off some bark into the safety causing it to stick.
It's in a bad place if you want an extra safety but it's also easy to eliminate if you want it gone.

BTW,
If you use loctite on it go sparingly or you will glue the firing pin in. About once a year someone will bring in rifle for me to get it apart for them. They end up loctiting the bolt in their bolt-action or semi-auto receiver mounting scope bases with too much locktite.
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
exdetsgt
Levergunner
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by exdetsgt »

Thank you, sir, for this information. If I decide to order the plug from you, can I install it myself, or do I have to send it to you?
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3873
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by COSteve »

Its simple to install yourself. All you have to do is open the action a bit and you'll see a small pin going through the top of the bolt below the safety. Just drive the pin out (left to right) and the safety, a small spring, and a little tiny ball detent can be removed. Then all you do is insert the button from Steve (making sure to align the cutout for the pin), insert the pin (right to left), and you're done. :D
Steve
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
exdetsgt
Levergunner
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Rossi 92 safety removal.

Post by exdetsgt »

Thank you, Steve. Sounds like I might even be able to follow the directions, mechanically challenged and all. But I'm getting better from having learned how to field-strip Glocks, a Kimber Ultra Carry II (even with a paper clip), a Ruger LCP, and a Keltec P3AT. You may wonder why this is so difficult, but I was a revolver guy in my previous life. Still have two, my beloved S&W Model 36 no dash Chiefs Special, and my venerable Combat Masterpiece.
They just don't make 'em like that no more.
Post Reply