1. Is the ejector housing steel or aluminum?
2. Is the new version still beefier than a Model P?
3. Does the barrel still have the novel on the side?
4. Can the lock be removed from the grip? Are different parts needed?
5. Throats?
6. Are there one-piece wood grips available?
Thanks for any info.
OT Questions about the New Vaquero
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
Otto
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 8:37 am
- Location: Coshocton, Ohio N40.217, W81.834
OT Questions about the New Vaquero
"...In this present crisis, government isn't the solution to the problem; government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence
- J Miller
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 14906
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
- Location: Not in IL no more ... :)
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
Otto,
I'll answer your questions in order:
1. Is the ejector housing steel or aluminum?
Steel
2. Is the new version still beefier than a Model P?
A bit, but not significantly so. For ammunition purposes it should be considered to be in the same strength level as the Colt SAA and other copies.
3. Does the barrel still have the novel on the side?
No, they moved it to the bottom.
4. Can the lock be removed from the grip?
Yes.
Are different parts needed?
You'll have to fabricate a main spring strut support to replace the lock assembly.

Here is a pic of a custom main spring support meant to replace the lock.
5. Throats?
Hit or miss. Some are good, some aren't.
6. Are there one-piece wood grips available?
Most likely not. The grip frames are still one piece.
Thanks for any info.
Your welcome.
Joe
I'll answer your questions in order:
1. Is the ejector housing steel or aluminum?
Steel
2. Is the new version still beefier than a Model P?
A bit, but not significantly so. For ammunition purposes it should be considered to be in the same strength level as the Colt SAA and other copies.
3. Does the barrel still have the novel on the side?
No, they moved it to the bottom.
4. Can the lock be removed from the grip?
Yes.
Are different parts needed?
You'll have to fabricate a main spring strut support to replace the lock assembly.

Here is a pic of a custom main spring support meant to replace the lock.
5. Throats?
Hit or miss. Some are good, some aren't.
6. Are there one-piece wood grips available?
Most likely not. The grip frames are still one piece.
Thanks for any info.
Your welcome.
Joe
Last edited by J Miller on Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts
.***
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
I will add that the lock isn't intrusive. You have to modify the grips or remove them to use it. If you want a Colt type gun, get a USFA or a Colt...
I like my NV AND I like my USFA guns. However, USFA is going to go to another, supposedly safer, hammer as standard.
I like my NV AND I like my USFA guns. However, USFA is going to go to another, supposedly safer, hammer as standard.
with this additional comment1. All USFA Core Production will ship with USFA's New Patent Pend. Safety Hammer. This new invention still uses a rigid firing pin and maintains the classic profile of the historic SAA Type Hammer. This new feature will allow the user to store the firearm with the firing pin removed affording complete safety. No other firearms maker provides this security.
This new invention also saves manufacturing costs and ease of service/ cleaning and repair. While allowing different types of firing pins (traditional center fire, center fire magnum, and rimfire) to be used in the same hammer body.
andIn addition, USFA has begun the approval process for Mass. Drop Test Compliance.
An historic hammer can be ordered at extra cost when placing your order for core product offering. The historic hammer will still be standard on most custom shop product.
All orders accepted for delivery on the books by Jan 15, 2009 can still be delivered with the older hammer design.
The next SA I get will be a COLT.3. Beginning in Jan, 2009, serial numbers on core production will now only be placed on the frame toe. They will be eliminated from the front of the trigger guard and backstrap.
The Old Armory Original™ Series will continue to feature the traditional numbered locations.
Old Armory Original™ Series. Models Included in Series and offered with the new Old Armory Original™ features: Henry Nettleton, Custer Battlefield, Gunslinger, Sheriff Model, and US Pre-War.
Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
-
JerryB
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5492
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:23 pm
- Location: Batesville,Arkansas
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
My grandson has two NV's in .357 and is really happy with them just the way they are.
JerryB II Corinthians 3:17, Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
JOSHUA 24:15
JOSHUA 24:15
-
Otto
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 8:37 am
- Location: Coshocton, Ohio N40.217, W81.834
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
Thanks everybody. I guess all I need is a pair of grip panels and I'll be good to go. Hobie, those USFA's are nice, but I already have a pair of Cimarrons, and was looking for something with a transfer bar. As far as I know that means Beretta or Ruger.
"...In this present crisis, government isn't the solution to the problem; government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence
- J Miller
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 14906
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
- Location: Not in IL no more ... :)
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
It could be that Otto is of the same mind set I am. I hate and despise the key locks and simply will not own a gun so equipped. I'd like to have a New Vaquero too, but the very first thing I'd do would be take that stinking lock out and toss it. Intrusive, or unobtrusive, is irrelevant. The fact that it's there is bad enough.Hobie wrote:I will add that the lock isn't intrusive. You have to modify the grips or remove them to use it. If you want a Colt type gun, get a USFA or a Colt...![]()
I like my NV AND I like my USFA guns. However, USFA is going to go to another, supposedly safer, hammer as standard.with this additional comment1. All USFA Core Production will ship with USFA's New Patent Pend. Safety Hammer. This new invention still uses a rigid firing pin and maintains the classic profile of the historic SAA Type Hammer. This new feature will allow the user to store the firearm with the firing pin removed affording complete safety. No other firearms maker provides this security.
This new invention also saves manufacturing costs and ease of service/ cleaning and repair. While allowing different types of firing pins (traditional center fire, center fire magnum, and rimfire) to be used in the same hammer body.andIn addition, USFA has begun the approval process for Mass. Drop Test Compliance.
An historic hammer can be ordered at extra cost when placing your order for core product offering. The historic hammer will still be standard on most custom shop product.
All orders accepted for delivery on the books by Jan 15, 2009 can still be delivered with the older hammer design.The next SA I get will be a COLT.3. Beginning in Jan, 2009, serial numbers on core production will now only be placed on the frame toe. They will be eliminated from the front of the trigger guard and backstrap.
The Old Armory Original™ Series will continue to feature the traditional numbered locations.
Old Armory Original™ Series. Models Included in Series and offered with the new Old Armory Original™ features: Henry Nettleton, Custer Battlefield, Gunslinger, Sheriff Model, and US Pre-War.
So USFA is going to ruin their product line. They've already priced themselves out of my ability to buy one. Now they acquiesced to the blood sucking lawyers and the commie state of MA so I have zero interest in them.
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts
.***
-
Otto
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 8:37 am
- Location: Coshocton, Ohio N40.217, W81.834
Re: OT Questions about the New Vaquero
Pretty much. It's almost enough to make me not buy one at all.It could be that Otto is of the same mind set I am. I hate and despise the key locks and simply will not own a gun so equipped. I'd like to have a New Vaquero too, but the very first thing I'd do would be take that stinking lock out and toss it. Intrusive, or unobtrusive, is irrelevant. The fact that it's there is bad enough.
Almost
"...In this present crisis, government isn't the solution to the problem; government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence
"...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." Declaration of Independence