Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
pharmseller
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Willamette Valley, OR, USA

Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by pharmseller »

I recently chrono'd some American Eagle 158 gr. SJSP 357 mag loads from my 20" barrel Browning 92. The average velocity was 1760 fps. What should I expect with my 16" barrel Winchester 94 Trapper?

P
We are determined that before the sun sets on this terrible struggle, our flag will be recognized throughout the world as a symbol of freedom on the one hand, of overwhelming power on the other.

General George C. Marshall, 1942
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by Pete44ru »

IMO, you're going to have to handload to make a difference, as (AFAIK) most factory .357 ammo is loaded with the proper powder/charge to achieve max velocity in handgun length barrels.

.
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7778
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by Tycer »

I'm gonna take a guess at 1780.
I don't think any barrel length helps the 357. I think the small case of powder runs out of pressure after 16". I can fire a tube full of hot 357s and the barrel of the trapper is cool the last five inches.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8396
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by TedH »

I'm with Tycer. I don't think you'll see a decrease.
NRA Life Member
GANJIRO

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by GANJIRO »

I believe AK Church in one of his older articles on Gunblasts tested Buffalo Bore brand 357 ammo using a 16" and 20" barreled rifles and found that after 16" you actually lose some velocity due to powder being spent and friction from additional 4 inches of barrel left. The amount as I recall is minuscule though still there. You'd be very safe to call it even and definitely not a loss in the shorter barrel.
Buffboy
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Gann Valley, SD

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by Buffboy »

"People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence, they're begging for rule by brute force, when the biggest, strongest animals among men were always automatically 'right.' Guns ended that, and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make it work."

- L. Neil Smith
pharmseller
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Willamette Valley, OR, USA

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by pharmseller »

That's a great site!
I'm very surprised by the velocity trend and very pleased that my handy little "toy gun" can be a deer killing machine inside of 150 yards (as long as I do my part, of course). I'd love to carry it next year.

P
We are determined that before the sun sets on this terrible struggle, our flag will be recognized throughout the world as a symbol of freedom on the one hand, of overwhelming power on the other.

General George C. Marshall, 1942
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16949
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by Old Savage »

Then there are those pesky real world varitions. My 20" Cowboy shoots 50 to 89 fps faster than my 18 1/2" C with the same box of Win 158 gr 357 Mag ammo.

Anyone who has done much chronographing with different rifles knows this could be a variation between the two barrels and their chambers etc. You pretty much have to chronograph the two rifles with the ammo you want to shoot to find the difference. It is in my opinion not enough to override the rifle you like most.

Look at the fired cases from both rifles and see if one is tighter than the other with less bulge in the case - that can affect vel. - my experience has been Win has more generous chambers. That is a small sampling though.

I do think 150 yds might be strectching it.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 33922
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by AJMD429 »

With only a two inch difference, you might even find the shorter barrel faster, partly because the cartridge is a handgun one, but ALSO because the individual difference in guns sometimes is several hundred feet per second - especially if they are of different brands.

Bottom line is I doubt there'd be any significant difference one way or the other.
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16949
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Velocity difference .357 mag Browning v Win Trapper

Post by Old Savage »

True AJ, I chronographed one 30-06 22" that was significantly faster than a 24" that I bought. A 243 BLR with a tight chamber and bore would have beginning loads at almost max from the #11 Speer manual.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
Post Reply