Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
JohndeFresno
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4559
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm

Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by JohndeFresno »

I had purchased the Chrony Beta F1 Chronograph approximately a year ago(!) and finally had the chance to mess with it. It was SIMPLE to use, despite the geeky documentation; and turned out to be one of the most entertaining gadgets that I have purchased in recent years. I purchased it for something under $200 ($160??) - a chronograph, wire, and portable printer/calculator with hot buttons.

The Chrony F1 is set at the factory to give you fps; there is another model that you can buy if you are into that weird European metric system, and you get centimeters per second or something equally confusing (definitely not American!).

I don't have experience with any other chronographs, and I know that there are some fancy (make that, "pricey") models out there. But I loved the fact that it was tiny, that I could set it up in a couple of minutes, and that all I had to do is five things, despite all of the confusing instructions:
1) Place tape markers on the screen guide wires at 4 and 6 inches above the electric eye to shoot in that plane
2) Move the device to the lee side of my truck due to it being an extremely bright day
3) Turn on the "print" button on the printer after connecting the wire
4) Hit the "Statistics" button on the upper left of the printer to get all of the calculated info onto the tape
5) Turn off the power to the chronograph between strings, then start over with each caliber or gun

Image
The chrony folds up into a palm sized object. The batteries (one AA lasts 48 hours of continuous use) and cable fit into the device. The printer with its roll of paper is about the same size. Both fit into the shooter's bag that was sent to me by the NRA-ILA for a donation, with room to spare for the rods and sectioned glare diffuser devices that fit on the rods. There was also plenty of room for spare AA batteries (one needed for the chronograph) and AAA batteries (four used by the printer).

I had limited resources at hand, since the person who owns the property where I tested the device was not available; so I just used a bucket to mount the actual chronograph, the hood of my truck to hold the integrated printer and control panel, and a chair over which to drape the firearms being tested. You need to be 10 feet away from the Chrony (with a rifle) so that muzzle blast of the more forceful calibers does not interfere with the readings. Instructions are included, of course, with the product - 8 ft. for 30-30, less distance for handguns, etc.
Image

Image

Here is the printout of a light target load (9.3 grains Red Dot, Lyman 311041 in a Marlin 336). The velocity spread is a bit more than I wanted to see, but that was an aid to remind me that I should have used a more careful technique in scooping up the flaky powder with my Lee dipper!
Image

For some reason, the above picture cuts off information, although it displays properly at PhotoBucket. When you press the "Statistics" button after firing the last shot in a string, you get a printout as above.
Minus symbol (-) : Lowest MV in string
Plus symbol (+) : Highest MV
Asterisk (*) : Average MV
Letter "C" : Extreme Spread (ES)
Diamond symbol : Standard Deviation (SD)
Letter "T" : Number of shots in string being calculated

With the chrony, I was pleased to see that the loads that I tested were very close to what I had thought that they would be; but also a bit surprised to find out that the difference in a certain load between a 6.5" Taurus .44 Magnum and a 10.5" Ruger Super Blackhawk was only 100 fps - that's only 25 fps per inch. It is my all-time favorite target and plinking load, one that is deadly accurate:
Magnus 240 gr. SWC Beveled Base, moly coated hard cast bullet (#701M)
9.0 gr. Unique, CCI 300 Lg Pistol primer, COAL 1.609"
6.5" Taurus: 1078 fps avg; 10.5" Super Redhawk: 1171 fps

For less than 200 frogskins, I would encourage any fence-sitters to plop down the money and dive into the world of electronics!
Last edited by JohndeFresno on Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:31 pm, edited 7 times in total.
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14906
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by J Miller »

John,

Great report. Nice Toyota too.

One question about the Chronograph unit. How far is it between the screen guide wires? Front to back?

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by O.S.O.K. »

I've had the basic chrony for many years - they are only about $70 w/o all of the printers, wires, etc.

All that I want is to get the velocity readings for each shot - and I can write them down and do the simple math myself.

Works just fine.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
Mike D.
***Rock Star***
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by Mike D. »

John, that looks an awful lot like our shooting area on the Home Ranch south of Sac'to. Yesterday, we were shooting down the new vineyard rows in order to get 200 yds to the target. I have a Beta Master and love it. The ultimate simplicity for a simple guy. :lol:
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Borregos
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by Borregos »

O.S.O.K. +1
Pete
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
JohndeFresno
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4559
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by JohndeFresno »

Joe,
Thanks twice. The distance between the screens is 12 inches, with this device. I found a good writeup on several brands of chronographs, with photos and details that might interest you:
http://www.realguns.com/Commentary/comar44.htm

Oh-Sock,
I agree with you! The basic unit is really inexpensive, and it does everything that you want.

But I'm just a bit lazy, so for something like $40 to $60 more I got the printer so that I could just take the results home without much scribbling on paper; and I can enjoy myself more. With that little printer, I shoot, it makes a little burp, and I know that the shot is captured. Then I hit the "Stats" button for it to do my figuring for me. Pretty slick!

On the tape, I merely enter my "Load Number" at the beginning of each set; like "0083." I have a database that tracks all of the vital stuff, so a load number gives me a concise way to differentiate my loads. When I head out to the range, I just print out the loads that I am testing for more info at my fingertips. I hate to write in the field - even hated having to scratch out tickets when I was in uniform!

Mike D -
Yup - my shirttail relative and friend has some grapes, and used his D9 'pillar dozer to put up a big dirt mound at the end of some rows so that we could shoot!
Ben_Rumson
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2569
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:51 pm

Re: Not Really OT - CHRONY F1 results

Post by Ben_Rumson »

Glad you like your new gizmo 8)
"IT IS MY OPINION, AND I AM CORRECT SO DON'T ARGUE, THE 99 SAVAGE IS THE FINEST RIFLE EVER MADE IN AMERICA."
WIL TERRY
Post Reply