Model 94 in .348?
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Model 94 in .348?
Did any of you sharp-eyed Levergunners notice that something was not quite right on page 81 in the September, 2008 issue of The American Rifleman? In the article on the top ten hunting rifles, the Model 94 is listed as number two, Mr Mark A. Keefe IV lists the various calibers for which the Model 94 was chambered. He includes the .348 Winchester in the list. I am not an expert on Winchesters but I understand the only rifle chambered for the .348 WCF was the Model 71. Anybody out there know any different?
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 21344
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: Model 94 in .348?

Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Re: Model 94 in .348?
It was a mistake.
The .348 WCF rim won't even fit between the frame(bolt) rails of a 94 Winchester receiver, let alone the mag tube opening in the receiver or the loading gate. If you could somehow overcome all that, the cartridge length is too great to work in a 94 action.
The .348 WCF rim won't even fit between the frame(bolt) rails of a 94 Winchester receiver, let alone the mag tube opening in the receiver or the loading gate. If you could somehow overcome all that, the cartridge length is too great to work in a 94 action.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
-
John in MS
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:56 pm
Re: Model 94 in .348?
Yep, I saw that and couldn't believe they made that silly mistake...
John
John
"Pistols do not win wars, but they save the lives of the men who do. The noble 1911 is a mechanical marvel, whose ruggedness, dependability & ferocious power have comforted four issues of GIs and which, unlike any other instrument you can name, is as much superior to its rivals today as it was in 1917."
-Col. Jeff Cooper, 1968
-Col. Jeff Cooper, 1968
Re: Model 94 in .348?
I saw that too. Those type of mistakes seem to be pretty common. They just missed it during the editing process. 1886.
Re: Model 94 in .348?
I am beginning to believe that the proofreaders know nothing on the subject and so can't catch such things.
Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
-
Leverluver
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:02 pm
- Location: WY
Re: Model 94 in .348?
Same proof readers that read scripts for TV shows. Saw a CSI rerun last night where the suspect shot a Kodiak bear (illegally of course
) with a 357 in FLORIDA
. (Ooops, not Florida, thinking of the wrong CSI. It was Nevada) Now if Sarah was the one doing the shooting, it would have been more believable 
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16949
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Model 94 in .348?
Actually - that is pretty consistent for all of CSI which is almost entirely BS.
