Bearcat chronograph results
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Bearcat chronograph results
Jim, here are the readings each cylinder was shot in the same order per chamber so we can see if there are any fast or slow chambers.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Wow! Pretty good for that little short barrel!
CCI Maxi Mag
1179.4 average
WW Super X
1203.6 average
THANK YOU!!
The 30 grainers averaged 1368.8!
CCI Maxi Mag
1179.4 average
WW Super X
1203.6 average
THANK YOU!!
The 30 grainers averaged 1368.8!
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
That group was at 10 yards with the Super X load. Might shave that front sight just a bit after I shoot it more.
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Mine (still .22 LR) hits about POA at 25 - 30 feet but a bit to the left. Not enough to worry about. I cut the front sight to where it is.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Mine is perfect now for cutting prickly pear apples off the plant at normal ranges. But I’m reluctant to take a file to it until I shoot it a lot more.
But the gun cycles correctly now and it doesn’t look
Like I have any fast or slow chambers.
But the gun cycles correctly now and it doesn’t look
Like I have any fast or slow chambers.
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
It looks good!
I am happy with mine as a LR .... at least for now.
I am happy with mine as a LR .... at least for now.
-
Bill in Oregon
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 10728
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
- Location: The Land of Enchantment
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Now cut that out, fellas! 
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Who? Us?
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
I straightened the trigger some on mine and cut the trigger guard to a "Half Fitz" to get my finger into the guard easier.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
I recall that the stainless Bearcats originally came out as convertibles, but then Ruger issued a recall on the magnum cylinders, claiming a timing issue. They never reissued the guns with WMR cylinders after that. It doesn't pass the smell test for me. Anyone know the actual reason for discontinuing the factory magnum Bearcats?
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Too bad I am not closer, we could play................Joe
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Where did you get those stocks Joe? They are nice looking.
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
I purchased this gun from a man who sent it to Single Action Service and had the 3" barrel put on. I assume they also put the grips on too. It has a nice trigger and is a great grouse gun......Joe
- JimT
- Shootist
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: On the San Gabriel River, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
Thank you Joe.
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
"
I was tempted to build a Fitz out of a 2" Smith model 64, but in the end, I just bobbed the hammer and did that "Half Fitz" treatment to the trigger guard, like you did on this pistol. It does help.
NRA Life Member, Patron
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Bearcat chronograph results
There shouldn’t be a timing issue as the hand isn’t anywhere close to the.22 Magnum rims.samsi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:35 am I recall that the stainless Bearcats originally came out as convertibles, but then Ruger issued a recall on the magnum cylinders, claiming a timing issue. They never reissued the guns with WMR cylinders after that. It doesn't pass the smell test for me. Anyone know the actual reason for discontinuing the factory magnum Bearcats?
Perhaps they had the same issue that I did?