The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post all political posts here.

Moderators: Hobie, AmBraCol

Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing

Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
Post Reply
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 26385
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by AJMD429 »

Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by Tycer »

AJMD429 wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 6:38 am
Not surprising if this is true - - - http://freerangestats.info/blog/2020/05 ... -data-firm.

More on it - https://zenodo.org/record/3871094#.XtY76zpKg2y
Yep. Absolutely fabricated. The data from Africa is not entered in any record. Australian hospitals deny having any relationship with the company.

And this is the article that several countries used to immediately ban HCQ for COVID19.

NOTHING TO SEE HERE... Move along...

$1000 pill good, $1 pill bad.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://schoolsucksproject.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
User avatar
earlmck
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2942
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:10 am
Location: pert-neer middle of Oregon

Re: The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by earlmck »

Wow! Seems there is no limit to the depravity of the left. Who would ever have guessed that a potential treatment for Covid-19 would be a political issue, with the subsequent manufacturing of fake news?

I'm badly behind the curve these days -- I still haven't wrapped my mind around toilet paper being a better item of barter in emergency situations than 22 shells would be.
The greatest patriot...
is he who heals the most gullies.
Patrick Henry
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 26385
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by AJMD429 »

earlmck wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 10:05 am
I still haven't wrapped my mind around toilet paper being a better item of barter in emergency situations than 22 shells would be.
It's like Rock Paper Scissors, only instead of a circular ranking, if you add 'Gun', it pretty much wins...

"Hey I'll trade you some TP for some ammo and/or a gun...."
"No, Thanks...."
"Well, Shucks...." :|

"Hey I'll trade you some ammo and/or a gun for some TP...."
"No, Thanks...."
"Well, Let me Rephrase that...." :|
"I will give you part of this ammo if you DON'T give me your TP..." :mrgreen:

Granted - that would only be 'last resort' for us nice guys, but in dog-eat-dog bad times, people get desperate, and the ones with guns (and skills and brains and friends) tend to win.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 28039
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by Blaine »

National VA Director sez VA is prescribing 42,000 doses a day of HCQ...... Draw your own conclusions.
I wish for you the courage to be unpopular. Popularity is history's pocket change. Courage to tell the truth is history's true currency.
#2canplaystupidgames
Image
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7537
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: The 'study' saying hydrochloroquine no good....

Post by Grizz »

here is someone who has real live data on the subject. I heard her on a radio program and believe she is telling truth. the links on this page form and back up her position

https://vivelifecenter.com/coronavirus- ... -dr-vliet/
Post Reply